Posted on 05/23/2006 10:25:54 AM PDT by Dont Mention the War
So the current buzz is stating that the Democrats are finally waking up to what we've known since 1993: Hillary is a disaster waiting to happen. And who are they increasingly looking to as their savior? Why, Al Gore of course!
This leads me to ask a simple question, just for fun: Which is the greater evil: Hillary or Al Gore? Which one would scare you more if they made it to the White House?
Hillary is a full blown Marxist, Gore's just a clown.
I think both are defeatable. Rats would be doing the country a favor by nominating either IMHO.
That is like asking which creature you might rather be killed and eaten by. . .'a shark'. . .or 'an alligator'. . .OR. . .
McCain
Gore is pitiful; Hillary is scary.
Its also like asking what country should rule the world... you can pick between Iran or North Korea.
Gore, he's such an idiot that he wouldn't really be running the show which means there'd be some nameless faces ruling the country.
Hillary is such an egomaniac you just know it'd be her running the whole thing so at least we'd know who was doing the decision making.
Evil is worse than moronic.
I sometimes wonder if we'd be better off in the long-term had Gore won in 2000. His inevitably spineless response to 9/11 would've brought a Republican into the White House in 2004 with a clear mandate to go to the Middle East and clean their clocks. There'd be no parsing of words in the media and the support of a war would be damned near unanimous.
Frankly, with the spineless response of the GOP to the border situation they deserve to be ousted from power to make way for a new team of real conservatives in 2008.
And I'm still thinking we need a Free Republican party!
I'd far rather have McCain than either Hillary! or the Bore.
But, since this is a poll, Hillary! is vastly more dangerous. Gore is a pinhead.
Gore now thinks the reason he lost in 2000 is that he didn't go with his gut and harangue the country more about the phony "global warming" scare. If he runs, it'll be as the mad prophet of the climate airwaves. It will be hilarious and appalling all at the same time. Run, Al, run.
"How would you rather be killed?"
a)By a million cuts or
b)Run over by a mack truck.
"Gregg, what is the worst fraternity on this campus?"
"Well, that would be hard to say, sir. They're each outstanding in their own way...."
Hillary stole Al Gore's iron-clad lockbox and now has the 2008 'Rat nomination safely stored inside. Thus it is she we must defeat.
albore is H'weird's darling. And we know how H'weird goes over with the rest of the populace--just look at the movie failures at the box office.
hildebeast is an amoral, ethically-challenged communist that brings a sexual predator to office AGAIN.
Definitely, hildebeast would be scarier.
Neither. Cause they will certainly unite all conservatives in opposition.
Gore is a chump,
Hitlery is the antichrist
Al Gore scares me more. Here's why:
He has much in financial resources.
He would get the sympathy vote because he received a majority of the popular vote in 2000 but did not get the office.
His new movie coming out will increase his popularity.
I truly believe that Al Gore could win this time.
Yep, Al scares me.
I think those two posts , #2 & #3, sum this up for me. I will now skim the rest of the thread.
What scares me more is McCain vs Hillary.
Hillary, cold and calculating is more dangerous then just being an outright loon.
When it's stupid vs. evil, stupid is less dangerous. The bst choice is "none of the above".
I seriously wonder if you typed this with a straight face.
RINOs scare me more
The question is: Which one is more scary as president? The outcomes are not knowable, but I am more worried about Gore as president. Hillary would be more aggressive against Islamofascism. The other minor differences between the two liberals aren't worth worrying over compared to defense of the country, in my opinion.
True, but Hillary! is a fundraising machine. AlBore may have Hollyweird behind him, but She has George Soros and his minions.
He would get the sympathy vote because he received a majority of the popular vote in 2000 but did not get the office.
Possible, but historically unlikely. IMHO, he is now perceived as a loser, which pretty much dooms his chances.
His new movie coming out will increase his popularity.
I believe it will show him for the complete and utter barking moonbat we know him to be. Railing about global warming has about as much traction as promising to raise taxes; Remember how well that worked for Fritz Mondale?
I truly believe that Al Gore could win this time.
It is far too early to rule anything out, but I do not believe he could.
"Hillary is a full blown Marxist, Gore's just a clown."
Well said.
I'm not scared of either of them. I'm scared of the 50% of America who would vote them into office given the chance.
Oh where to begin? Your post has to be nominated for the dumbest post of the day.
Gore. At least she's sane.
MANBEARPIG
McCain vs. Algore would not be automatic for me...
Al Gore would scare me more...He is a doofus. Hillary pretty bad, but Gore is Jimmy Carter II.
Hillary, hands down.
Is it too late to change my vote?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1636949/posts
Stir in John Kerry and you would have a real threesome.
Then there's Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, Jay Rockefeller . . . .
It's extremely sobering to think that these politicians have all been repeatedly elected to office.
Thats a tought question, but Hillary is far more terrifying. She is pure evil. An America hating Marxist that wants to destroy the foundations of our nation. Gore is part buffoon, part opportunistic charlatan, and is a grave danger to our way of life in his own right, but he doesn't have the air of pure evil that Hitlery has.
I think you nailed it. It is like who would be worse, Lyndon Johnson or James Earle Carter? I think LBJ was worse, but only by a nose.
Hillary might triangulate (f we are very lucky), like her husband. Gore would do a Green Earth flameout, and take our civilization down with it.
Gore is Hillary w/o the penis.
Did anyone ever consider what would happen if they are both on the ticket as P/VP?
Either one would send me to the closest bunker ....
If these are the best candidates they have, the 'Pubbies, no matter how badly scarred by immgration, war, and spending, have a chance...
OF the two, Hillary! is scarier - she's infinitely ruthless in her pursuit of power and the MSM loves her...
Kinda like Kong vs Godzilla and the USA is Tokyo... yikes!
Hillary is evil personified.
Gore is more harmful to himself.
Al Gore is clinically insane, Hillay is evil. Between a nut and willful malevolence, I'll choose the nut!
I concur!
With Gore, he'd do nothing for 4 years and we'd just have to watch things deteriorate, but with Hillary, well, "we'd have to take things away from you for the common good!"
That is scary!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.