[cogitator]

Anyone who expects a static climate after a 6-billion year history of constant changes, is too stupid to take seriously.

Anybody who doesn't understand that the last 10,000 years have been an unusually stable global climate (as underscored by Fagan's book) isn't really taking the issue seriously.

[Old Professer]

And anyone who expects that man can maintain a fortuitous circumstance by dint of will and fumbling is a fool.

[Publius6961]

Anybody who doesn't understand that the last 10,000 years have been an unusually stable global climate (as underscored by Fagan's book) isn't really taking the issue seriously.

Only if you believe that the earth is 6000 years old.

Do you have a grasp of what 6 billion years is?

What percentage is 10,000 of 6 billion?
On what basis can the last 10,000 years be deemed more critically important to the debate than the previous 5,999,990,000?
Because you happen to be here?
What?