Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wanted: 1,000 gay brothers (Barf Alert!)
In Newsweekly ^ | May 17, 2006 | Patty Caya

Posted on 05/26/2006 12:40:46 PM PDT by DBeers

Wanted: 1,000 gay brothers


Large new study that seeks to find evidence of linkages to sexual orientation requires many participants

Researchers are attempting to discover a genetic linkage to sexual orientation by studying one thousand pairs of gay brothers. This five-year study being conducted by researchers from Evanston Northwestern Healthcare Research Institute, Northwestern University and the University of Chicago will be the largest study of this kind and is sponsored by the National Institutes of Health.

This study follows a similar genetic study, conducted in the 1990s that found some genetic correlation for sexual orientation.

That original study was conducted with 40 pairs of brothers and revealed evidence that there might be a linkage. When subsequent research couldn't replicate these findings, the scientists realized that they weren't working with a large enough sample size to provide the statistical power required to advance the research.

Previous twin studies have pointed to evidence that the linkage is due to heredity rather than environmental factors, but until the researches can isolate the genes that directly affect sexual orientation, they can't be sure.

"Family studies tell you that something is familial, that things tend to cluster in families," says Dr. Alan Sanders, MD who heads the gay brothers research study. "Then we ask what else tends to cluster in families. Genes do."

There is not a lot of research in this area but, like most genetic research, it is controversial.

"Genetics is controversial, says Sanders. "And specifically sexuality research, but this is where there is a great deal of interest."

"Folks don't like this kind of research, that shows that sexual orientation is genetically based," he says. "It undermines the argument that it is a choice."

If they find a genetic link for sexual orientation, then the argument goes, you don't blame people because they have blue eyes, why would you blame them for their sexual orientation? This kind of research undermines the choice argument and that bothers some groups who are out to prove that sexual orientation is something one chooses.

The genetics that Sanders and his colleagues believe is responsible for sexual orientation is complex genetics where multiple genes and environmental factors contribute to the trait, as in the case with intelligence.

"Some folks might have enough of a genetic contribution that they are going to be very intelligent no matter what, others might have a better chance, but it will depend on key things in the environment," he says. "That's the way a lot of things are that we study,"

Researchers also say they believe that more than one gene is responsible, rather than a one-to-one correlation - as in heredity - for something like eye color.

"Genes do more than one thing," says Sanders. "They have more than one function. Maybe the gene that contributes to sexual orientation does something else as well."

He says each gene contributes a varying amount to each trait. This is especially true for behavioral traits and personality traits such as novelty seeking, aggression or violence. Not just one gene is involved.

Sanders says the biggest challenge with this kind of research is finding the one thousand pairs of gay brothers. He and his colleagues have been searching for participants for several years and have recently beefed up their recruiting efforts and expanded the search worldwide.

Participation is simple. Interested participants are first asked to fill out a brief questionnaire. Then, they submit a blood sample or DNA saliva test. "That's the hardest part, the thing that requires the most effort is having blood drawn," he says. "We're hoping to switch, to DNA samples from saliva soon. That should help out."

All information obtained from participants will be kept confidential and will not become part of any medical records Sanders says.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; Philosophy; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: aids; birthdefect; disease; homosexualagenda; junkscience; pervertperverts; perverts; pervertspervert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-99 next last
Another example of government funded homosexual activist wishful thinking.
1 posted on 05/26/2006 12:40:47 PM PDT by DBeers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DBeers

"We've done a study of 1,000 gay brothers and found that brothers who are gay tend to be gay and have gay brothers as well"


2 posted on 05/26/2006 12:42:47 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Can gay incestuous twins get married in Massachussetts?


3 posted on 05/26/2006 12:44:14 PM PDT by Vicomte13 (Aure entuluva!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
Maybe the gene that contributes to sexual orientation does something else as well."

it would take at least 6 months to post all the one-liners for this crap

4 posted on 05/26/2006 12:45:13 PM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
"Folks don't like this kind of research, that shows that sexual orientation is genetically based," he says. "It undermines the argument that it is a choice."

*****************

It doesn't undermine the fact that there is a choice, however. Homosexuals can still choose to be celibate.

5 posted on 05/26/2006 12:46:11 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
Researchers are attempting to discover a genetic linkage to sexual orientation by studying one thousand pairs of gay brothers. This five-year study being conducted by researchers from Evanston Northwestern Healthcare Research Institute, Northwestern University and the University of Chicago will be the largest study of this kind and is sponsored by the National Institutes of Health.

It doesn't matter if it is one pair or a thousand. The researchers will conclude only what they want to conclude.

6 posted on 05/26/2006 12:47:27 PM PDT by SaveTheChief ("This one goes to eleven.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
Maybe the gene that contributes to sexual orientation does something else as well."

It's also responsible for lisps, zig zag finger snaps and head bobs.

7 posted on 05/26/2006 12:47:43 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Well, I've done a 'lifetime' of study and find that hetero folks usually rear hetero kids! LOL.....


8 posted on 05/26/2006 12:48:16 PM PDT by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AFA-Michigan; AggieCPA; Agitate; AliVeritas; AllTheRage; An American In Dairyland; Annie03; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping!

If you oppose the homosexualization of society
-add yourself to the ping list!

To be included in or removed from the
HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA PING LIST,
please FReepMail either DBeers or DirtyHarryY2k.

Free Republic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword = homosexualagenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

If they find a genetic link for sexual orientation, then the argument goes, you don't blame people because they have blue eyes, why would you blame them for their sexual orientation? This kind of research undermines the choice argument and that bothers some groups who are out to prove that sexual orientation is something one chooses.

Just recovering from lesbian brain theory -and now this on the horizon?

It is but more severely flawed research with only ambiguous results possible coming our way eventually to be AP headlined as definitive.

Only those subjectively driving an agenda and not objective scientists rush in like this putting the cart before the horse. Before one can objectively link anything to "orientation" one must first objectively be able to identify orientation...

9 posted on 05/26/2006 12:50:04 PM PDT by DBeers ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litehaus

*****Well, I've done a 'lifetime' of study and find that hetero folks usually rear hetero kids! LOL.....*****

And homosexual folks usually rear...ummm...no, too easy...


10 posted on 05/26/2006 12:52:05 PM PDT by Zeppelin (Texas Longhorns === National Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Zeppelin

..ummm...no, too easy...----Not easy for them to "make'em"


11 posted on 05/26/2006 12:54:38 PM PDT by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

I know 2 gay brothers--but they're twins--for what it's worth


12 posted on 05/26/2006 12:56:23 PM PDT by brooklyn dave (Imagine them singing "What a friend we have in Jesus" in Mecca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

My question is how do they separate the nature from the nurture in this scenario. Two brothers may have the same genetice code, but they also share the same environmental forces that might steer them towards homosexuality.


13 posted on 05/26/2006 12:56:43 PM PDT by Juana la Loca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
P.S. From the Molecular Genetic Study of Sexual Orientation - FAQ
D. Who is NOT eligible to volunteer for the study?

Identical (monozygotic) twins are not eligible since it is already known that their DNA (genetic material) is the same. However, we know of other researchers studying identical twins; if such a family is interested in potentially participating in a twin study, we can provide researcher contact information. Individuals below the age of 18 are not eligible due to more uncertainty as to their actual sexual orientation as adults.

It would appear this study is ALL about subjective behavioral psychology and has NOTHING to do with objective physical science...

14 posted on 05/26/2006 12:59:17 PM PDT by DBeers ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

IOW they are already assuming the end result and thus have tained the study.

This is bogus even before it starts. It must be in anticipation of another round of homosexual based marriage votes.

Next we have the FR gene.


15 posted on 05/26/2006 1:00:25 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litehaus

well no, i was just gonna say, the only people they rear is each other.


16 posted on 05/26/2006 1:00:49 PM PDT by Zeppelin (Texas Longhorns === National Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Entire Department of Health and Human Services could be scrapped as far as I am concerned.


17 posted on 05/26/2006 1:00:59 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior

Did you say brothas?

18 posted on 05/26/2006 1:01:54 PM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Juana la Loca

Yeah, a better test (to the extent there is ANY validity here, which is a big question) might be to test gay and straight brothers.

I actually know of a family of 9 brothers, 2 of whom ended up gay. One of the two is dead of HIV, though.

Messed up home life, though. Mother was a real domineering witch. Father very weak.


19 posted on 05/26/2006 1:02:00 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Good God! Taxpayers money at work?


20 posted on 05/26/2006 1:03:29 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Scientists want to get into gay brothers genes?........


21 posted on 05/26/2006 1:03:34 PM PDT by Red Badger (Liberals ignore criminal behavior, reward sloth and revere incompetence...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

I would submit the fact they are EXCLUDING identical twins establishes this study is 100% a waste of time.

If identical twins with identical DNA exhibit different sexual behavior then the homosexual gene premise is gone.

IOW the sample has been rigged. (and a waste of tax dollars. Seriously who put in the funding bill for this monstrous fake?)


22 posted on 05/26/2006 1:04:17 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Juana la Loca
My question is how do they separate the nature from the nurture in this scenario. Two brothers may have the same genetice code, but they also share the same environmental forces that might steer them towards homosexuality

See my post #14. The "researchers" separate nature from nurture at the outset. They will study physical characteristics that are most likely the results of a behavior (they skew the study in this direction by only sampling self declared adult homosexuals) and then they will attempt to claim physical results (a linkage) to an as yet unidentified innate "orientation"...

23 posted on 05/26/2006 1:05:16 PM PDT by DBeers ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

While they're at it, they need to do a new study of Gay Siamese twins. The Ben Dover Institute conducted one many years ago. It was funded by Doublemint Gum.


24 posted on 05/26/2006 1:05:21 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY ((((Truth to a Liberal, is like a crucifix to a vampire))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

EXACTLY!!!!


25 posted on 05/26/2006 1:05:37 PM PDT by DBeers ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
Hmm, then is this is based on genetic makeup why not include the father? Or the mother for that matter and see if she has the hots for the same sex?

Or, better yet, just study the entire family and calculate if more than one family member enjoys ingesting feces.

26 posted on 05/26/2006 1:07:17 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (What is is about "illegal" you don't understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
Researchers are attempting to discover a genetic linkage to sexual orientation by studying one thousand pairs of gay brothers.

I notice they aren't talking about the sets of twins where one is a homosexual and the other isn't. Can you say 'agenda driven study'?

27 posted on 05/26/2006 1:07:50 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
"Folks don't like this kind of research, that shows that sexual orientation is genetically based," he says. "It undermines the argument that it is a choice."

What's next, the great search for the "adultery gene"?

"See, Honey? I couldn't help myself! It's hereditary!"
28 posted on 05/26/2006 1:09:54 PM PDT by Antoninus (Ginty for US Senate -- NJ's primary day is June 6 -- www.gintyforsenate.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaveTheChief
It doesn't matter if it is one pair or a thousand. The researchers will conclude only what they want to conclude.

That's precisely the impression I got from this article. Activist science ain't science at all.
29 posted on 05/26/2006 1:10:58 PM PDT by Antoninus (Ginty for US Senate -- NJ's primary day is June 6 -- www.gintyforsenate.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

We couldn't prove the results we wanted so we need more people to get the results we still won't get?


30 posted on 05/26/2006 1:11:07 PM PDT by Jaded (does it really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
Identical (monozygotic) twins are not eligible since it is already known that their DNA (genetic material) is the same.

If it were all nature and no nurture, studies of identical twins would reveal that in ALL cases, if one was "gay", both were. Ever seen such studies done? I know they have been--it's strange that the homo-promo cheerleaders don't trot them out more often...
31 posted on 05/26/2006 1:13:38 PM PDT by Antoninus (Ginty for US Senate -- NJ's primary day is June 6 -- www.gintyforsenate.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Next we have the FR gene.

LOL -I always like to use the analogy of seeking the "Religion Gene" with the punch line being that there are those that faithfully claim believe in a genetic basis for either the practice of Religion and or the practice of homosexual activity; HOWEVER, it is only Religious activity that is Constituionally guaranteed... Faith in homosexual activity is a non-starter...

32 posted on 05/26/2006 1:14:35 PM PDT by DBeers ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

LOL at that.

By the way, "1000 Gay Brothers" will be opening for Depeche Mode on the 15th at Jones Beach Amphitheater. Get your tickets now. /kidding.^_^


33 posted on 05/26/2006 1:16:03 PM PDT by zaxxon ("A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes ." -Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Wouldn't they be better served to find brothers where one is happy and the other is not ?


34 posted on 05/26/2006 1:16:33 PM PDT by stylin19a (There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brooklyn dave

My brother is gay.


35 posted on 05/26/2006 1:16:50 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

You know, I would love for someone to actually do such a study --- twins, no twins, gay and not gay and delve into the issue for real.

Why?

1. To answer the question for real.

2. And hypothetically, if there was a gene that made people succeptiable to being gay, it would be likely that a vaccine could be eventually created to turn it off.

All that said, I think it is largely, if not exclusively, environment and choice.


36 posted on 05/26/2006 1:17:09 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

"Genes do more than one thing," says Sanders. "They have more than one function. Maybe the gene that contributes to sexual orientation does something else as well."

He says each gene contributes a varying amount to each trait. This is especially true for behavioral traits and personality traits such as novelty seeking, aggression or violence. Not just one gene is involved.



So this guy is basically saying that homosexualuality is still a personal choice, but it's the genes that make them "snappy dressers and put the skip in thier step?


37 posted on 05/26/2006 1:17:44 PM PDT by reillygirl246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

"Next we have the FR gene."

Well, the libs all say we are insane and try to prove it.


38 posted on 05/26/2006 1:18:07 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Unless they're trying to find a way to 'repair' this gene, I don't see the point.


39 posted on 05/26/2006 1:19:35 PM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

""Family studies tell you that something is familial, that things tend to cluster in families," says Dr. Alan Sanders, MD who heads the gay brothers research study. "Then we ask what else tends to cluster in families. Genes do." "

Same as alcoholism. Still doesn't mean you cannot overcome the abnormal attraction to the same sex just as you can overcome the abnormal attraction to alcohol!


40 posted on 05/26/2006 1:19:35 PM PDT by dcnd9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

They will come up with the result they want. It is obvious from the subjects of the study they are trying to create evidence to justify a finding rather than gather evidence and base a finding on what the evidence shows.


41 posted on 05/26/2006 1:19:47 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

The "gay" gene that is the alleged culprit for this disease was found not be a sex-linked gene at all, but affected the ligaments and tendons that are found in and around the wrist area of the arm, causing the wrists of these victims to go "limp". </sarcasm)


42 posted on 05/26/2006 1:20:51 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

If there is a flaw in a gene producing the abnormality of being "gay" then that means it could be subject to gene therapy!

I don't think gay activist are going to like that outcome.


43 posted on 05/26/2006 1:24:20 PM PDT by dcnd9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Rosie O'Donnell is homosexual. She has a brother who is homosexual. So is it genetic? Maybe...........


44 posted on 05/26/2006 1:24:21 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: trisham
It doesn't undermine the fact that there is a choice, however.

Indeed. If they come to the conclusion that homosexuality is genetic, who is to say there isn't a genetic component to pedophilia? Doesn't mean they don't make choices about their behavior.

It's interesting that scientists say there is a genetic link for obesity, but we still expect people to control what they eat. Why do they not think it appropriate to expect people to control their sexual behavior?

45 posted on 05/26/2006 1:24:35 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Exactly! They just HAVE to find some kind of link to genetic queerness to validate the queer cause, no matter how much money it takes! Disgusting!


46 posted on 05/26/2006 1:25:48 PM PDT by derllak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dcnd9
If there is a flaw in a gene producing the abnormality of being "gay" then that means it could be subject to gene therapy!

I would also be willing to bet that people who can afford it will have their unborn children tested. If the 'gene' for homosexuality is present, they will abort the child.

The law of unintended consequences.

47 posted on 05/26/2006 1:25:54 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
"My brother is gay."

Then you should pray for his recovery.

48 posted on 05/26/2006 1:27:35 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

sounds like a casting call for gay porn.


49 posted on 05/26/2006 1:29:15 PM PDT by Waverunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

50 posted on 05/26/2006 1:29:19 PM PDT by TommyUdo (The De-Looks Shore Dinner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson