Posted on 05/27/2006 4:31:32 AM PDT by FerdieMurphy
First thing is in 06 support donate work for all R's and D's that stood with us in the House and in the Senate. That is an absolute must. Do not punish good Conservatives for the sins of RINO's. We can not afford to lose any good conservatives in 06, we need more not less. RINO's get NO support, vote Rats if you must but send the RINO packing. Then in 08 we nominate a Conservative in fact not just in name for the office of President.
Where's the barf warning?
Right. Just like the tantrum that is thrown by those who view everything through political glasses minus the commo sense and ability to see clear trends, patterns, and their logical outcomes!
Perhaps a better definition of insanity is an inability to recognize the logical consequences of a chosen, or advocated, course of action.
WO! Looky here. Looks like you said the same thing, but it would appear that your horizon for the "inability to recognize the logical consequences of a chosen, or advocated, course of action" appears to be a mere moment in time vice the years of our nation beyond the next two!
Funny how perspectives can put some things right back in their can, eh!
Pardon us while we don't overly focus on the next 24 months while throwing the entire history of the United States of America in front of the oncoming Subway!
P.S. I'd find some things quite amusing as well if they weren't so dire.
BTW, are you even remotely familiar with the Senate immigration bill that just passed?
You speak as if you haven't a clue. Really.
Yup. Well reasoned and said.
I'm in California. No one I vote for will win, the best I can do is a protest vote.
I support all conservatives, but it's like bailing the Edmund Fitzgerald with a teaspoon here.
Right, and the crazies are driving the moderate GOP. What WTH's the difference in outcomes?!?!
What is the last piece of conservative "stuff" to emerge from the GOP "led" Senate??? What's the sum total of it Over the past few years?
And don't tell me USSC nominations. There are plenty of ways to skin a cat.
Losing the Senate for a cycle (two years), if it even came to that, won't nearly be as bad as a continuation of what's presently going on assuming that it's taken back in '08. IMO we may very well lose it in '08 anyway and there appear to be more true conservatives up then than now. All we need is to lose a couple of those and we're really screwed.
Think ahead a little.
"No, but this talk plus stupid talk from the liberal-tarians about a third party might make things just right for a rat take over."
Seems to me we just had a Rat takeover of the Senate while we are supposedly in the majority. If you can't tell the difference in the voting record of your supposedly conservative senators and the rats then whats the difference?
I find them quite amusing anyway...
BTW, you can't replace most judges. They leave when they die or are impeached. They're appointed by the President, not the Congress.
But here's something, what has the Senate Judiciary Committee done to try to reestablish the separtion of powers that you refer to? Anything at all? If not, then why not?
Then take a look at which GOPs are on that committee and maybe it'll come to you.
LOL...
Yeah, I guess ya have to. ; )
Certainly he is without any governing philosophy that I know of.
I feel for you. I am in Texas and things were going down hill here too. Fortunately this immigration thing has woken up a lot of voters.
That's it for RINOS to take it out on in 2006 in the Senate. Basically, DeWine is it.
Yeah, it's a real crappy election to do much other than for possible 3PC (CP) candidates. IMO they'd get Dim votes too in the right states, of which there are many however.
I wonder how many senators that voted against the immigration bill voted against it merely b/c they were up though.
Almost too late for America, barely too soon for the shooting to start...
The drugs help...
Economic isolationism and political isolationism are two different things.
For example a country "A" can trade freely with another country "B" or country "A" can remove the two-bit dictator of country "B" and then trade with that country.
My opinion: Both types of isolationism are off the mark.
The simplest solution to getting the point across to both parties (Dems and Reps) is to provide another option when voting; "None of the above".
"70 years of Liberal Judicial activism not over turned in 5 mins...."
Since 1968 the Republicans have held the Presidency for 24 years, the Democrats for 12 years.
The President appoints all federal judges. The Senate confirms them. The Republicans have controlled the Senate most of the time since the 1980's.
So where are the conservative judges? Where are the conservative rulings? I certainly expect a large amount of moonbat liberal raving from the bench, but WHERE ARE OUR GUYS? Are they on a permanent vacation? Did they all turn into Rats?
I'm not asking for the moon here. I don't expect anything overnight, but its been DECADES and we've got NOTHING so far.
We win the House, Senate, and the Presidency, and we get gay marriage, a lunatic educational system, ten zillion illegal aliens, and not one single, solitary rollback of one single solitary liberal social program. They can't even kill the 'Endowment for the Humanities'. Pathetic results.
How long must we wait? How long until even you say, "Enough already, these guys are useless."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.