Skip to comments.ANATOMY OF TREASON (Our Senate)
Posted on 05/30/2006 5:12:23 AM PDT by FerdieMurphy
On May 24, 2006, against the will of the vast majority of American citizens, in defiance of prudence, fairness, logic, and common sense, and with total disregard of American national interest (see footnote 1), the majority of the U.S. Senate (all but four Democrats and almost half Republicans) passed the so-called "Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act (CIRA) of 2006.
The Act, also known as S. 2611 bill, would (if enacted into the law) Mark Andrew Dwyer One would hope that this despicable act of betrayal of American voters by their elected "representatives" in the Senate, in which the consenting senators promptly gave away, to the invading hordes, what was not theirs (roughly a quarter of our country, with its infrastructure, living space, and resources, that is), is a one time anomaly that can be corrected within the system of governance by political or administrative means, but that, unfortunately, is not the case. In this article, I argue that U.S. Senate's cowardly capitulation to blatant demands by millions of illegal aliens and their American collaborators who were parading, like a victorious army, on the streets of several American cities earlier this Spring (read my commentary  for an account of these events), is a result and a necessary consequence of a half-century old, well concerted effort to disable healthy mechanisms of American national self-preservation and survival.
Although one might trace the roots of current decay of the Republic back into 19th century and to its famous philanthropists (I highly recommend an eye-opening paper  to those interested in this subject), gradual destruction of national identity and means to preserve it begun shortly after WWII, partly as a reaction to atrocities committed by Hitler and his followers, as well as rising racial tensions in the South. As a result, sweeping Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other laws have been passed during the disastrous Lyndon B. Johnson presidency, and that included the infamous Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 that opened flood gates for uncontrolled and largely illegal immigration from countries whose populations were only marginally, if at all, present in ethnic mix of the U.S. at that time.
The main objective of the Civil Rights Act, follow-up laws and Supreme Court decisions was, we were told, to end anti-black racism and make the playing field level" so blacks can compete in par with whites in pursuit of their American dreams, despite being handicapped by past slavery (some 150 years ago) and discrimination (still present in parts of the country at that time).
This led to institutionalizing of affirmative action and other forms of racial preferences (that were intended to benefit blacks, and - one can argue - justly so) that is sometimes referred to, particularly in British literature, as the "reverse discrimination".
The main flaw of these legal acts was, rather than clearly state who was the intended beneficiary of these acts (the descendents of American black slaves), they introduced confusing, if not misleading, and never properly defined terms, like "underrepresented minority", "disparate impact", "equal outcome", and "diversity", instead. That turned out to be the first nail in America's coffin, which the U.S. Senate is trying to drive the last one into these days.
Making "the playing field even" for blacks (the reverse discrimination, if you will) provided golden opportunity for more assertive and highly prolific "Hispanics" and other "minorities" to use the imperfect system, full of loopholes and lacking any means to maintain American national identity, to their advantage and to advantage of various races and ethnicities covered by that loosely defined misnomer, despite the fact that they did not suffer from past slavery or discrimination in the U.S., or if they did, their misery was self-inflicted as they, unlike the slaves, voluntarily arrived at Americas shores, often in violation of American borders and the law of the land.
As it became clear that the outcomes of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were not going to be fully satisfactory, the push begun to implement harsher and harsher, if not draconian, laws that would punish presumably "racist" whites for resisting the changes it imposed on the nation, and to ostracize all those who spoke up against it or against the way it was being implemented. As a result, vast majority of decent, hard working Americans stopped expressing their disapproval of "affirmative action" and other measures that gradually eliminated or relaxed fair political process and meaningful qualification criteria in order to avoid "disparate impact" on "underrepresented minorities" and to secure "equal outcome" of their efforts, out of a sense of "white guilt" and fear of being labeled "racist". That played really well into the hands of Hispanic ethnic hustlers that quickly learned how to hijack the American black civil rights movement and make it their own cause, which slick maneuver automatically put them into privileged position, shielded from growing disapproval of average Janes and Joes by the thought police of "political correctness" and by a threat of use of the weapon-word "racist".
As of today, tens of millions of self-imported "minorities" (most of them from Mexico) and their offspring (who, incidentally, benefit from a loophole in another act of the U.S. Congress, the "birth citizenship" clause of 14th Amendment that aimed at granting U.S. citizenship to freed black slaves and their children -- not to illegal migrants' kids) took advantage of unfairly skewed political process (gerrymandered voting districts are an exhibition of such) and a lack of meaningful qualification criteria.
Affirmative action together with engineered "diversity" injected hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of "minority" students and workers, who would otherwise not qualify, to American academia, mass media, and corporations' management. Many of those "minority" individuals that undeservedly benefited from affirmative action. Rather than being grateful and appreciative of this rather unusual chance for upward mobility in the American society, assumed roles of little spies on behalf of their nations of origin and/or racial and ethnic groups, which fact brought this country to a point where the white majority could not express freely their opinions anymore; nor did it feel at liberty to resist a well concerted assault on their majority role in the U.S., out of fear of being denounced as "racist" by these little spies and their influential ethnic mentors.
But the most devastating effects of the loopholes in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, follow-up laws and Supreme Court decisions took place exactly where it all began: in the U.S. legislature.
Like hungry sharks in a tank with fat fish, "Hispanic" politicians skillfully playing the minority card pre-empted, one by one, several seats in the U.S. House of Representatives that were meant for blacks, and emerged, eventually, as a deciding (pivotal, if you will) faction in the U.S. Congress, for votes of which other politicians and lobbyists to compete. Obviously, the rapidly growing population of Hispanics, which growth almost totally may be attributed to post-1965 immigration (legal and otherwise) and Hispanic immigrants exorbitant fertility rates, further facilitated this gradual takeover of power by what later became the largest minority in the U.S., but there was a strong feedback between these two processes as well: any increase of Hispanics in the U.S. Congress contributed directly to growing dysfunction of the I.N.S. (whose enforcement functions are currently carried out by the I.C.E.) that was already ill prepared to stop, or even slow down significantly, the flow of surplus of people from economically insolvent, but overpopulated, Mexico into the U.S.
This, in turn, accelerated growth of Hispanic population in the U.S., and vice versa, the rapid growth of Hispanic population in this country that was fueled by rising tide of migration from Mexico and other Latin American countries mounted a strong pressure towards electing more and more Hispanic congressmen a task relatively easy to accomplish under the circumstances of recently created system of preferences for blacks, with virtually no meaningful means of voter eligibility verification, that Hispanic candidates, claiming the privileged status of underrepresented minority and the mandate to represent the so-called immigrant communities (many of which are suspected of wide-spread voter fraud), quickly learned to use to their own advantage.
The state of California is well ahead of the U.S. Congress in this respect. As of today, state Senators and Assemblymen of Mexican descent are in firm control of most legislative trends, and many of them don't even hide which side of the American-Mexican border their loyalties lie - note the royal reception that they extended to El Presidente Vicente "Fox" Quesada during his present visit to the U.S.
It is worth remembering that some 30 years ago, California was 86% white, and "Hispanics" in state legislature were about as rare as Moon eclipses. Today, white population is less than 50% and over 50% of newborn in the state are Hispanics, which if the current trends continue and CIRA bill is enacted into the law - will inevitably turn California into Hispanic majority state with stronger ties to Mexico than to the U.S.
As one can expect, California legislature torpedoes any attempts to stem the mass inflow of Mexican migrants into the Golden State and, despite the multi-billion dollar budget annual deficit and federal law that prohibits aiding or abetting of illegal aliens, generously subsidizes the migrants and their children, compliments of the Americans who pay their share of taxes, so that the migrants can root themselves and survive in this most desired part of the U.S. that is characterized by relatively high cost of living and skyrocketing home prices.
Today, the "Hispanic" lawmakers in federal and state legislatures are in vanguard (or the fifth column) of the "Hispanic" invasion of the U.S., making sure that the invaders (mostly, Mexican "migrants") are not inconvenienced by no sticking borders or the immigration laws. It is enough to say that the driving force behind the "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" Act of 2006 (an amended compromise proposal, originally co-authored by the notorious Kennedy McCain duo) was Sen. Mel Martinez, R-FL, of Cuban ancestry (see  for details) who would never get elected to the U.S. Senate if it weren't for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the follow-up legislation that it spurred. And you can bet a horse and carriage on it some of the senators, who weren't quite comfortable with the CIRA bill, did not speak up or vote against it out of fear of being called "racists" by their "Hispanic" (or Liberal) colleagues. Remember Senate Majority Leader Sen. Reids remark that designating English as the official language of the U.S. was "racist"? Well, that's the way they still muzzle each other over there.
To make things worse, the above does not exhaust the maladies the American political system and its fruit, the U.S. Senate (not that other elected officials and bodies are much better) suffer from. Not surprisingly, many of these maladies have their origins in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.
The Democrat Party, after successfully hijacking the civil rights cause as its exclusive property, has gained popularity among the voters since -- and draws profits from that hijacking until this day.
It would be naive to assume that the treasonous "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" Act of 2006 was purely Democratic idea. After all, 23 out of 55 Republicans voted for it, but one needs to realize that mass importation of disgruntled masses from impoverished countries is championed chiefly by the Liberals and not by honest (those who don't live in corporate donors' pockets, that is) Conservatives.
The political process has been trivialized to a point where the voters have to choose between the bad and the hopeless (and sometimes there is not even that much difference between the candidates), or there is no choice at all because the voting districts have been meticulously gerrymandered in order to secure the "correct" outcome of free election. (This can only be compared to pre-arranging a deck of cards before playing a blackjack or any other game of "fair chance".)
The weak government doctrine (equally strong Democrats fighting Republicans, and vice versa, and voters who seem to do their best to maintain that equilibrium) as a necessary condition for freedom and liberty made the government weak to the point where it can no longer resist invasion, and is easily manipulated by "Hispanic swing voters and such banana republic as Mexico and its corrupt government.
The voters get dumber and dumber as the "education" establishment replaces education with indoctrination and outright propaganda. Many of them don't know history of the U.S.; nor can they see the inconsistencies and hypocrisy in promises and programs of those they vote for -- never mind disastrous consequences of mass "migration" of Mexicans and the explosive population growth that it spurs.
Such secondary issues as gay marriages, women's right to choose, and endangered species legislations, just to name a few, became -- for way too many voters -- decisive factors of whom to vote for.
As a result, the majority of U.S. senators and other elected officials are clearly committed to one or other side of these secondary issues, and are viciously fighting for them when it comes to passing feel good legislation of one sort or another, but have rather haphazard, if not casual, stances on such issues of utmost importance for the entire country as the sovereignty of the U.S., border enforcement, national identity, and protection of America's wealth (both material and intellectual). Their patriotism and courage is quite random (since it wasn't even a factor during the elections), never mind their notorious inability to foresee the devastating consequences of the half-baked measures they keep pushing down our throats (see  for a typical example). So, it must surprise no one many of them have had no problems with betraying We the People on behalf of the illegal but numerous "migrants". As a result, they (the senators) are cowardly yielding to sheer power of the invaders and agree with the logic of mob, while the President Jorge "Bush" Arbusto is dancing to El Presidente Vicente "Fox" Quesada's mariachi music.
False "truths", like one should always help the weak and never fight back against them, no matter how aggressive and venomous these "weak" might be, that international "minorities" are all equally entitled as we are to the fruits of our work because of past slavery in America, and the U.S. is a "proposition nation" that will function the same no matter what is the prevailing ethnicity, national identity, and cultural background of its population -- even though these are mostly Americans of European ancestry that adhere to all the principles the U.S. has been built upon -- further paralyze any attempts to resist blatant invasion of our country by "migrating" hordes of hostile and unassimilable, mostly Mexican, aliens.
Those senators, who willingly sold us out to the invaders, their leaders, and collaborators, used the above and alike as handy excuses for not acting for America's benefit and in her defense.
The so-called "mainstream" media, controlled by a coherent group of individuals (the Hollywood propaganda machine belongs to this category, too) and saturated with "minority" spies and open-border utopists to the point that they (the media), by and large, cannot afford to declare themselves on the side of the majority of Americans anymore, seek the so-called middle ground between the lawful residents of this country and the lawbreaking invaders. This confuses many voters who often perceive staunch defenders of this nation against the invasion and uncompromising opponents to America's sellout as extremists and, as a result, vote for the treacherous "moderates". (An example illustrating absurdity of the middle-ground compromise is very much in order here. Suppose, one group says "2 + 2 = 4", a true statement, and another group says that "2 + 2 = 3", a false statement. Now, the "middle-ground" statement would be "2 + 2 = 3.5", which is as false as 2 + 2 = 3 was.
Meanwhile, the vast majority of ethnic and racial groups, both in America and elsewhere, are exercising their racial/ethnic solidarity, many of them with obvious hostility and militancy, the main objective of which is to expel the whites from their own countries (in the U.S. and Europe) or, at least, to submit them to minorities control, while the whites remain the only racial group that, by and large, practice suicidal altruism and do not allow themselves to face or to not welcome their slow but steady extinction and open threats thereof by rapidly growing echelons of ethnic revisionists, never mind readying to defend themselves against the final attack that must inevitably follow these threats. Demands of "Whites go back to Europe" and "This is our continent that "Hispanic" demonstrators unashamedly threw around for quite some time, became a commonplace during the recent "immigration" protests but were largely ignored by Washington establishment and the "American" press.
A while ago, I was contemplating photographs of the ruins of Forum Romanum - the remains of a magnificent civilization that was conquered and destroyed by hordes of primitive but fierce barbarian warriors that Rome's ruling elites were unwilling to fight.
Will our children look at the ruins of the U.S. Senate on Capitol Hill and think of "migrating" hordes that came from civilizations thousands of years behind that of the Roman Empire and destroyed the U.S. despite all the feel good legislation that the Senate had passed, I asked myself? It appears that the answer to my question is being decided now.
As to the treasonous senators, whom H. Millard referred to as "political prostitutes" (see ), I can't help quoting The Declaration of Independence here: "Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government... ."
Time to make it very hot for these turncoat traitors.
So excited that the "T" word is finally being used!
Now if we can just get to the punishment for it, we might see a change in this country.
A couple of memorable lines:
"the voters have to choose between the bad and the hopeless"
"This confuses many voters who often perceive staunch defenders of this nation against the invasion and uncompromising opponents to America's sellout as extremists and, as a result, vote for the treacherous "moderates".
I think he's got it. Well done.
Yeah right, I'll be happy to simply wrest control of our government back from them. They've turned into a ruling class and have become an aristocracy of sorts. They behave like celebrities which is one of the first clues.
We'd better hope that the electoral process comes through for us or it's simply going to be more of the same. This whole thing with Jefferson really hammers home the notion that these guys really think that they are the government and not us!
Meanwhile, what other BS have they burried in bills that we don't know about that will only help them hold office longer entrenching themselves even further.
Where is Geronimo when you need him?
"It is worth remembering that some 30 years ago, California was 86% white, and "Hispanics" in state legislature were about as rare as Moon eclipses. Today, white population is less than 50% and over 50% of newborn in the state are Hispanics, which if the current trends continue and CIRA bill is enacted into the law - will inevitably turn California into Hispanic majority state with stronger ties to Mexico than to the U.S."
This the way Mexico lost Texas. They invited large numbers of settlers (primarily from the US) who had no alliegence to Mexico. When the mexican govt started making demands that the "texicans" didn't like they revolted and threw the Mexicans out. we are looking at the reverse situation in the Southwest but our Senate (and President) are too stupid to realize it.
Perhaps it's come to the unfortunate time when there is a real march on Washington, peopled by real Americans who want these scoundrels out of politics.
It's also time for us to become aware of a "true" American leader who will make so many drastic maneuvers against our enemies and against ALL illegal criminals in our country that it will cause a very large intake of breath on the part of the world.
Our enemies need to have their very breath knocked from them. We can begin with our own hemisphere by voiding the criminal agreement between the US and the old USSR about invading Cuber. Venezuela and all socialist-communist regimes are next.
I have studied hard and can find nothing that truly enriches or helps America in the WTO and can see that the NAFTA hasn't helped any nation excepting China (another chapter).
The pact that surrendered the strategic Panama Canal defacto to China, negotiated by that prime prune-faced traitor should be negated!
We need to regain control of our own hemisphere or we're doomed.
Enemies outside our province that appear to be a serious danger should be strategically removed, which wouldn't necessitate our occupying these enemy countries in order to build the impoverished people a new nation.
If you believe in the power of prayer, you might want to join us on this thread:
where we are starting a prayer vigil for the immigration issue in congress.
Senate amnesty lets guest workers remain in the US up to five years and to bring family with them. "Family?" It should mean only immediate family (husband, wife, children). The new does not exclude immigrants' extended family----uncles, aunts, grandparents, brothers, and so on and so forth, ad infinitum, as nauseaum.
Most egregiously, under prevailing wrong-headed interpretations of US federal law, any child born in the U.S. is a citizen, even if the parents are illegal aliens---so-called anchor babies. They are one of the major reasons the vast numbers of illegal immigrants have been allowed to remain in the country. The law was written to ensure citizenship to former slaves; it was never intended to give instant citizenship to the child of an illegal immigrant. Anchor babies are nothing short of back-door amnesty. The Supreme Court must reinterpret the law before the guests workers start arriving.
Finally, no guest worker, family member or illegal immigrant should be allowed to qualify for any form of public assistance or social welfare---including, but not limited to, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, the Women, Infants and Children program, state/county/local welfare in the form of direct cash payments (living allowances) or housing.
Guests workers must be able to support themselves and their families, and not become wards of the state, mooching off taxpayers. Guests of our country should be comport themselves as good guests, and should pull their own weight.
Bush: Read My Lips No New Amnesty
By Nicholas Stix
May 29, 2006
When George Herbert Walker Bush was the Republican presidential nominee for the first time, in 1988, he told the Republican National Convention, Read my lips: No new taxes. It became his most effective campaign slogan, and one of the keys to his electoral victory.
But Bush the Elder ultimately raised taxes. In 1992, his base responded variously by staying at home or by voting for third-party candidate Ross Perot, thus bringing brought about the election of Bill Clinton.
Immigrants are Our Future
Bush the Younger fancies himself much smarter than his father. Thus, he did not announce, during either of his presidential campaigns, his plan to grant an amnesty to what now amounts to according to pro-illegal immigration Bear Stearns economists Robert Justich and Betty Ng over 20 million illegal immigrants plus their parents plus their children plus their siblings plus anyone who will pay them to say they are blood relatives, much less his plan to bring in, according to an analysis by Sen. Jeff Sessions (R, AL) staff, another 200 million legal immigrants over the next 20 years, or to mention the tidal wave of new illegal immigration (another 100 million?) this amnesty would bring about. He knew it would cost him the election, if he did. And so, he bided his time.
Well, George W. Bush still isnt taking any chances, and so when he finally announced his amnesty plan, he did the equivalent of saying, Read my lips: No new amnesty. (What I have just described is not amnesty.) He figures that if he lies enough about his planned amnesty, people wont figure it out until its too late. Too late means after the coming fall elections. And to sweeten the pot for his social and religious conservative base (or as Karl Rove would call it, "the suckers"), he will propose a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage.
This is all a word game. Bush is simply calling amnesty by other names: temporary worker program, rational middle ground, etc. He insists that he seeks amnesty, er, rational middle ground only for veteran criminals, but not for rookies.
That middle ground recognizes that there are differences between an illegal immigrant who crossed the border recently and someone who has worked here for many years, and has a home, a family, and an otherwise clean record.
And yet, as Bush well knows, under the Treason Plan (known variously as the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act and as S. 2611) he champions and the Senate passed, 62-36, on Thursday, we will end up with amnestied, naturalized, temporary workers; amnestied, naturalized, recently arrived illegals; and amnestied, naturalized, long-term illegals. But for treason and democide to prevail, the House must pass its own version. Thus, there is still hope for America.
That Burning Sensation
The man who for years portrayed himself as a straight talker, is peeing on our leg, and telling us that its raining.
I voted for George W. Bush in 2000, and again in 2004. As the saying goes, Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.
I suppose President Bush can tell himself that his proposal isnt really an illegal immigration amnesty, because along with immigration law and Americas borders, he is eliminating the very concept of American citizenship. No legal citizens, no illegal immigrants.
The President says he is sending 6,000 National Guardsmen to the Mexican border, but is sending them unarmed, and in fact, not stationing them on the border at all, but in offices, where they will do paper work.
But thats just a stopgap. Mr. Bushs plan is, by the end of 2008, for the 6,000 do-nothing National Guardsmen to be replaced by 6,000 new, do-nothing Border Patrol agents. Thats over $400 million of nothing per year, courtesy of the American taxpayer.
If Citizens Didnt Exist, Wed Have to Invent Them
And yet, the ruling elites will still need something to distinguish themselves from the rest of those whose pockets theyre busy picking. And so, there will still be illegal immigration in-between serial amnesties that will occur every few years, because the elites will demand ever cheaper baby sitters, gardeners, cooks, cleaning ladies, dog walkers, car washers, etc. The elitesll show how morally superior they are to us paupers who cant afford illegal servants, by periodically demanding amnesty for their servants. This will also endear them to the servants. Then, as soon as the newest mass amnesty goes through, theyll fire their newly legalized servants, and replace them for even less with new illegals. (Im sorry, Maria, but I just cant afford you anymore.)
Soy Un Yahoo
Neocon godfatherette William Kristol has his own word for commoners: Yahoos.
Echoing the Liar-in-Chief, and apparently cognizant that consistency is one of the three laws of lying; Kristol denies that the Bush amnesty plan is, in fact, an amnesty plan. Unfortunately, however, like President Bush, Bill Kristol seems unaware of the first law of lying: Plausibility.
At this rate, George W. Bushs greatest political achievement will obtain in having rescued Bill Clinton from historical infamy. The Clintons reign of crime looks better with each passing day.
On Memorial Day, in honoring our war dead from the Revolutionary War unto the War on Terror, we say Lest we forget. At Gettysburg, Abraham Lincoln exhorted, that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain.
In the new dispensation according to George W. Bush, however, those men did die in vain. Bush fully intends to surrender our patrimony.
If the House goes along with the Senate and the People permit it, this Memorial Day will prove to have been a time to grieve for America itself.
The new Bush plan is the ultimate in taxation without representation. It is revolutionary in its provocation and in its consequences. Perhaps we should stop calling the plans patron President Bush, and instead start calling him King George.
We the People survived a civil war, but can we survive George W. Bush?
Thanks for posting this.
The central government in Washington is become rather like the socialist/communist (backed by the USSR) government that existed in Madrid thereby causing the Spanish Civil War.
If we look at the so-called freedoms we have today, the government's claim on us and ours has grown phenomenally.
"Look, our own little UN http://www.oas.org/main/english/ Here is a little historyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organization_of_American_States How much of this immigration crap was pre planned and how much of it is allowed by clandestine agreements made by the UN lite that none of us really knows about."
And this is what they have planned for America with Bill and Hillary Clinton as the heads or someone just like them.
This is the dream of Hillary and Bill.
Let's puncture that dream and make sure it never happens.
Billy Kristol never ceases to offend.
Thanks for posting ALL this, FM and KL!
We have already reached that point. I estimate that about 25% of my local and state taxes goes to illegal alien support and I live in conservative relatively affluent Orange County.
The meaning of the word "conservative" is same old, same old.. i.e. more of the same..
Without some RADICAL changes more of same the WILL CONTINUE TO HAPPEN..
Thats why the MAJOR effort to discredit the word "extremeist".. when extreme change is what is needed.. WHO is it, that have curried the apolexy on the word "EXTREMIST"?..
Democrats!!.. Should SHOW ANY with an honest interest IN U.S. POLITICS something that democrats HATE the word extremist.. unless its an extreme change toward a version of Marxism..
.. Are you a radical(extremist) or a conservative?..
Not all conservatives are conservatives.. America you see is ALREADY socialist country.. NOT WILL BE a socialist country.. ONLY an extreme change can change that FACT..
We have well passed the point of no return, and nothing is going to happen about it. Best adjust and adapt, the USofA as your grand parents knew it is long gone, never to be seen again.
We have well passed the point of no return, and nothing is going to happen about it. Best adjust and adapt, the USofA as your grand parents knew it is long gone, never to be seen again.
I agree that radical change is needed. But it ain't gonna come at once and it's also not gonna come at the hands of a nation whereby a majority of people are largely ignorant of the pertinent issues.
I agree which means recovery may and very probably will NEVER HAPPEN..
That's my ultimate conclusion.
Perhaps we should grab our pitchforks and our sporting arms and have a real march on Washington.