I’ve under the assumption that Mubarak was like Gadaffi in Lybia — that he brought stability to the Middle East.
Christians could survive under Mubarak’s leadership. And I bet that women were also better off.
Large Islamic populations are always unstable, always prone to wanton violence and tyranny, especially against women, Christians, Jews, Hindus, and anyone outside each narrow Islamic murder-sect.
Ghaddafy was a creepy bastard who ruled by force, associated with jihadists, and got along with nobody. Mubarak followed the rule of law, but it so happens that Egyptian law wasn’t like, say, that of the EU or the US. Or should I say, as US law used to be, pre-Obama...