Posted on 05/31/2006 2:05:49 AM PDT by E-Mat
Please use this thread to post information, discussions, or links that will help readers decide on the California Statewide Partisan Republican Ballot Offices below. Please refrain from rants, petty arguments, name calling, and other unhelpful replies.
Governor; Republican Party
Lieutenant Governor; Republican Party
Secretary of State; Republican Party
Controller; Republican Party
Attorney General; Republican Party
Insurance Commissioner; Republican Party
United States Senator; Republican Party
***State***
***County***
***City***
Governor: Considering that Arnold's going to win the primary anyway, I'm definitely considering voting for a candidate that at least tries to represent me. I'm considering Robert C. Newman, II on life issues. (Though Bill Chambers is better on immigration control)
Lieutenant Governor: Tom McClintock, of course! http://tommcclintock.net
Secretary of State: Bruce McPherson. Only one on my ballot and endorsed by Tom McClintock (my other litmus test).
Controller: Tony Strickland. Endorsed by Tom. Life issues.
Treasurer: Claude Parrish. Life issues.
Attorney General; Chuck Poochigian. Endorsed by Tom. Only one on my ballot. Life issues.
Insurance Commissioner: Steve Poizner. Endorsed by Tom. Only one on my ballot. Life issues.
United States Senator: Richard "Dick" Mountjoy. Endorsed by Tom. Only one on my ballot. Life issues.
Guides: http://www.californiaprolife.org/legislation/2006election.html
I know, it's an over-simplified approach. But that's why I posted here--to get confirmaton or convincing refutation.
ping
ping
ping
California is drowning in liberals....from both parties.
DO NOT VOTE FOR SCHWARZENEGGER!
I received a Club for Growth mailer yesterday saying to vote "no" on Steve Poizner for Insurance Commissioner. I thought that to be odd since they did not give an alternative except to just let a democrat have the job.
I'm also going with Newman for Governor.
Richman is a RINO with a capital R who sided with the dems on Caifornia budgets so he is definitely to be avoided as Treasurer.
E-Mat, thanks for your efforts!
This one also has some merit.
Robyn Nordell's Conservative California Election Website
For the June 6, 2006 Primary Election
http://www.robynnordell.com
I'm doing a write in on everything. The write in will say -- [x] NO


I will vote for an alternative to Schwarzenneger. I will leave IC blank. I'll hold my nose and vote for the RINO-ish McPherson. Claude Parrish easily gets my vote over Keith Richman.
Bill Chambers is pro-labor union (he was even against prop 75) and he's pro-abortion, so that's two major strikes. But he does seem to be the best on immigration control from what I've read.
Newman has a biblical squishiness to him, a bit all over the board politically.
I can't really get a pulse on Burns thusfar.

Initiatives - Links to Ballot Summary and other general info from SmartVoter.org (League of Women Voters):
Proposition 81: California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2006Pro/Con sites:Proposition 82: Preschool Education. Tax on Incomes Over $400,000 for Individuals; $800,000 for Couples
www.yesforlibraries.com
www.protecttaxpayers.comPro/Con sites:
www.noprop82.org
www.yeson82.com
Click for info on Strickland:

For the primary only, I'll be leaving that box blank. Poizner is very liberal. He is also aligned with the venture capitalists (John Doerr, Brooks Byer, Vinod Khosla, Reed Hastings, etc) that have been pushing all of the big-spending bonds on the ballot for such things as stem-cell research, solar roofs, etc. He supported John Kerry and touted an endorsement from his ex-boss, Richard Clarke (White House troublemaker/whistleblower). If I do vote for him in November, I'll need a very large clothespin.
Ditto.
If I lived there, I would vote NO on 82 for sure. I'd be on the fence on 81 - I support it in principle, but the money should be reallocated (i.e. by stopping welfare for illegals), not brought out in extra bonds.
Thanks. Sorry if I put it in the wrong place, lol.
And thanks for all your work. I had lots of boxes I still needed to fill in. Your threads are helping.
For those in Los Angeles County, I also just found this resource for evaluating Judicial candidates. It includes profiles, endorsements, and links to various news articles:
http://www.metnews.com/articles/2006/judicial_races.htm
Voting on 6/6/06.......scary
Poizner is a pro-business moderate in a highly liberal state. Even McClintock would agree that leadership requires a spectrum of leaders who can appeal to the complex political make up of California. Note that he is not going to be working on solar panels, but on insurance.
He is also the only one who will advance work-comp reform and move to modernize the DOI. A Dem in that spot could easily destroy this state by unraveling work-comp reform, or pushing for single payor health.
www.newsmeat.com/fec/bystate_detail.php?st=CA&last=poizner
Poizner, Stephen Gore, Al (D) Gore 2000 Inc $1,000.00 02/22/00 Poizner, Stephen L Democratic National Committee (D) $10,000.00 10/02/00 Poizner, Steve Kerry, John F (D) Kerry Committee $1,000.00 02/15/01 Poizner, Steve Kerry, John F (D) Kerry Committee $1,000.00 02/15/01 Poizner, Steve Mr. Bush, George W (R) Bush-Cheney '04 (Primary) Inc $2,000.00 06/30/03 Poizner, Steve Kobach, Kris (R) Kobach For Congress $2,000.00 07/31/03 Poizner, Steve Mr. The Wish List $1,000.00 04/08/04 Poizner, Steve California Republican Party/Victory 2006 (R) $9,952.00 06/07/05 Poizner, Steve Santa Clara County Republican Party(Fed) (R) $1,000.00 02/03/06
Y'know, what your post tells me is that Mr. Poizner had some kind of personal revelation along about 2002. Up to then he'd given $13K to the Dems, but subsequently all of his political contributions -- $15K if you exclude The Wish List -- have landed on the right side of the aisle. He's either cozying up to the GOP for personal political advantage or he's truly a political convert to a more conservative philosophy of governance.
I have seen no evidence of the latter. Like I said, I don't trust him.
If I "follow the money" it testifies that he has; what's he doing and/or what's coming out of his mouth to convince you otherwise? Not that I'm doubting you, but please substantiate your mistrust of the man.
During his 2004 candidacy for the Assembly, he refused to say whether he was supporting Kerry or Bush. At the same time, he touted his endorsement by Richard Clarke (who was busy attacking Sec. Rice and President Bush).The worst part for me, and the reason for the distrust, is his affiliation with Doerr, Khosla, et al. These people have used the initiative process to weaken constitutional protections over spending and to pass legislation from which they clearly benefit. Whether Insurance Commissioner, or Governor, I prefer elected politicians who will represent the people and do the right thing. I have a hard time believing Poizner is that guy.The Wish List traditionally supports liberal causes. He was making contributions to this fund 2 years ago.
That being said, I am not saying that I will vote against him in the General Election. My original comments were offered as an explanation to a post wondering why the Club For Growth had recommended voting "NO" for him.
Excellent. Thank you for the additional information. Now we are ALL more fully informed.
GOVERNOR: Robert Newman II - Psychologist, Farmer & 2003 Governor Candidate
LT. GOVERNOR: Tom McClintock - State Sen., Ex-State Assemblyman, 2003 Governor Candidate
SECRETARY OF STATE: Bruce McPherson - Incumbent
ATTORNEY GENERAL: Chuck Poochigian - State Sen., Ex-State Assemblyman & Attorney
TREASURER: Claude Parrish - State Board of Equalization Member & Ex-L.A. County Insurance Commissioner
COMPTROLLER: Tony Strickland - Ex-State Assembly Minority Whip & Anti-Tax Activist
INSURANCE COMMISSIONER: Jay Burden (write-in)
SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION Diane Lenning - Educator, Businesswoman & 2004 Community College Trustee
U.S. SENATOR: Dick Mountjoy - Ex-State Sen., Ex-State Assemblyman & 1998 Lt. Governor Candidate
PROP 81 - NO!
PROP 82- NO!
(Gee, they managed to get propositions on the REGULAR ELECTION ballot WITHOUT WASTING zillions of dollars on a "special election", are you listening Mr. "Fiscal Conservative" RINOLD SCHWARTZEKENNEDY?)
Hey, you get an "A+"!
Tell us about Jay Burden.
I'm leaning against 81 - I too don't want any extra bonds and can't see this dem-controlled legislature doing any reallocation. Libraries, IMHO, are on the way out anyway thanks to the internet.
bump for later
I wasn't trying to find reasons NOT to vote for Poizner, but I DO want to go in with my eyes open as to what kind of candidate he really is.
Look, the viable alternatives are pretty thin. Neither the Libertarian candidate, Dale Ogden, nor the American Independent candidate, Jay Burden, even bothered to submit a candidate statement. That, to me, speaks VOLUMES, as to the sincerity with which they are approaching this, and it says NOTHING good.
So, functionally speaking, Bustanut and Krafty the Dems are out, the Green candidate is out, the Independent, Libertarian and American Independent candidates are out; there's nobobdy left but Poizner. Love, like or loathe him he's gotta get the backing of Conservatives, if not in this Primary, certainly in November, because he has to have the horsepower to overcome all other-party challengers down the stretch.
Hold your nose, if you must, but vote for him if for no other reason than that a vote for him as a vote against everyone else vying for the office.
There is much to be desired with Arnie, but he is all we have, the two fighting it out for the democrats are both basically on the same page, I find them appalling.
The other republican candidates do not have name recognition, if we vote for those people we will have one of the democrats as governor.
McClintock is our "Star" (in my opinion) I will cast my vote for him and anyone he endorses.
I've known Mountjoy personally for over 40 years and until someone brought up the bastardazation of his name on FR i've never heard anyone suggest it or for that matter it had never crossed my mind.
That comment is over the top, His name is Richard, he chooses to be called Dick which is a nickname for Richard.
Gays, queers, lessies weren't an issue 60+ years ago in school and wouldn't have ever crossed anyones mind if they had even heard of such a thing.
I have an even simpler one. I get the LA Weekly and then vote against all of their endorsements.
I think that's a good plan. If the vote for McClintock comes in 10-20 points ahead of Arnold, that would be a great message to send.
The LA County Bar Association recommendations are at www.lacba.org
I can't remember why, but I remember voting for Henry in 2004.
It had something to do with some shenanigans by his opponents and he seemed like a stand up guy.
I posted some stuff on your other thread, so more discussion would probably be more appropriate over there.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1643733/posts
Judicial Recommendations for Los Angeles County
I just had to vote for a guy named Dick Mountjoy. What a name. I bet it was pur H*LL growing up with that name. I knew a guy named Finefrock in college and he said it was a horrible name to grow up with.
82 lost. Poor Meat Head. LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.