Skip to comments.Was the 2004 election stolen? No. (Salon Thoroughly Debunks RFK Jr?)
Posted on 06/02/2006 8:45:23 PM PDT by RWR8189
click here to read article
This clown also publicly asserts that his child murdering convict Camelot cousin, Michael Skakel, was innocent when the evidence was compelling that Skakel beat 15-year old Martha Moxley to death with a golf club and in a crazed rage, stabbed her through the neck with the broken shaft after he broke the metal club over her head.
The Kennedys are also now trying to weasel Skakel out of his well-deserved spot in prison, on yet another appeal by blaming who else, two young black men for having invaded lily-white Greenwich on the night of the Moxley murder "lookin' to kill a white blonde". Jesse Jackson, is of couse, silent when it comes to this virulent strain of Hyannis Port racism.
I was going to mention this as well. Weren't the West Virginia primaries also included in that year's election?
Guess this is all he can talk about these days what with Teddy being UBER un-environmental about the MA WINDMILL FARM when our alternative enegy needs are significant.
The Kennedys reeek with hypocrasy. Even they can drop their "lifelong mission" if personal convenience dictates.
Great! I was just looking for an article to use for my Critical Thinking class, and this will serve the purpose nicely. :-)
If you have ever watched RFK on TV, or listened to him on the radio, you can come to only one conclusion: the guy is dumber than a rock. He has only one thing going for him: his name. As Churchill and others have said, If you're young and not liberal, you have no heart; if you're old and not conservative, you have no brain. Kennedy is growing old.
And therein lies the subject of my initial post.....
Some Kennedys far outlived their worth to society.....
Some Kennedys are a pimple on the ass of society.....
And probably more corrupt
What is amazing to me is that NO ONE is questioning the REAL battleground state...Wisconsin! Bush lost to Kerry by a smaller margin that Kerry lost Ohio to Bush...there is ample evidence that Wisconsin should have gone to Bush because of the irregularities in Milwaukee...yet Ohio was "picked" as the pivotal state. Why? Because the media called Wisconsin for Kerry early on, even though it was closer than Ohio...making Ohio the "last" electoral state to be needed. Of course Salon and others will never look to Wisconsin in the same way as they've looked at the Ohio results.
I know the 1960 WVa primary was pivotal in the Dim nomination that year. Was it stolen too?
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. - The next time a kennedy tells the truth will be the first.
And nobody in the MSM will point this out...the love affair with the media and the Kennedy's continues...
A patently idiotic statement. If down-ticket candidates didn't outperform presidential candidates you'd never have down-ticket candidates win election in states that their party's presidential nominee loses, but in actuality cross-party voting is totally routine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.