Skip to comments.Was the 2004 election stolen? No. (Salon Thoroughly Debunks RFK Jr?)
Posted on 06/02/2006 8:45:23 PM PDT by RWR8189
click here to read article
What is amazing to me is that NO ONE is questioning the REAL battleground state...Wisconsin! Bush lost to Kerry by a smaller margin that Kerry lost Ohio to Bush...there is ample evidence that Wisconsin should have gone to Bush because of the irregularities in Milwaukee...yet Ohio was "picked" as the pivotal state. Why? Because the media called Wisconsin for Kerry early on, even though it was closer than Ohio...making Ohio the "last" electoral state to be needed. Of course Salon and others will never look to Wisconsin in the same way as they've looked at the Ohio results.
I know the 1960 WVa primary was pivotal in the Dim nomination that year. Was it stolen too?
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. - The next time a kennedy tells the truth will be the first.
And nobody in the MSM will point this out...the love affair with the media and the Kennedy's continues...
A patently idiotic statement. If down-ticket candidates didn't outperform presidential candidates you'd never have down-ticket candidates win election in states that their party's presidential nominee loses, but in actuality cross-party voting is totally routine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.