Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Haditha Child: I Knew of Bomb Plot to Kill Marines
NewsMax.com ^ | June 3, 2006 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 06/03/2006 8:26:22 AM PDT by Carl/NewsMax

A 12-year old survivor of the alleged massacre of innocent civilians by U.S. Marines patrolling Haditha has admitted she had prior knowledge of the plot to detonate an IED as their convoy was passing by her house on the morning of Nov. 19, 2005.

In a CNN interview broadcast Wednesday, Safa Younis - who says eight members of her family were killed by U.S. troops - recalled that she was getting ready for school as the Marine Humvee approached.

"I was planning to go to school. I was about to go out of bed. I knew the bomb would explode so I covered my ears," the youngster said, according to a CNN translator.

"The bomb [then] exploded," she explained. "The bomb struck an armored vehicle. I don't know if it was a Humvee or an armored vehicle. When the bomb exploded, they came straight to my house."

Younis complained that after the bombing killed Lance Cpl. Miguel Terrazas, his fellow Marines broke down the front door of her house.

"The American forces entered the house and started shooting with their guns. They killed my mother and my sister Nour. They killed her when she shot her in the head. She was only 15 years old. My other sister was shot with seven bullets in the head and she was only 10 years old."

The Haditha co-conspirator continued:

"And my brother Muhammad was hiding under the bed when the U.S. military hit him with the butt of the gun and the started shooting him under the bed. The U.S. military then shot me and I was showered in blood. We couldn't leave the house because the U.S. military surrounded the area with a large number of soldiers."

Younis said she survived by pretending to be dead.

But the "innocent" Haditha 12-year-old failed to give any further details about which other family members knew about the bomb plot. Or whether one of her relatives had detonated the blast.


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: haditha; ied; innocentchild; iraq; iraqichildren; murthaisapileofslime; murthastinks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-187 next last
To: cardinal4
His lips are moving..

True that cardinal4!

101 posted on 06/03/2006 10:14:07 AM PDT by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly
Good movie for you to review.. RULES OF ENGAGEMENT....

You're going to cite a movie to me as an authority?

102 posted on 06/03/2006 10:16:53 AM PDT by jude24 ("I said the law was powerless to help you, not punish you." - Chief Wiggam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
Exhume is exhume.

Were not the Iraqi bodies (results of the evil of Saddam and his henchmen) in mass graves in Iraq exhumed?

103 posted on 06/03/2006 10:19:01 AM PDT by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
In one of the homes, Marines ordered four brothers inside a closet and shot them dead, said the Haditha lawyer, Khaled Salem Rsayef.

Intresting how these people keep turning up with ties to terrorist groups or far left Hate America Always groups INDEPENDENCE: April 2006Thousands more gathered in Salem, Ore., and other cities in peaceful, ... An eyewitness Khaled Ahmed Rsayef whose brother was among the dead told the Time: ... redindependence.blogspot.com/ 2006_04_01_redindependence_archive.html - 836k - Cached - Similar pages

104 posted on 06/03/2006 10:25:35 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (I would rather be an Iraqi in a Hidatha guarded by Marines, then a subject of Al-Qeda anywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

Comment #105 Removed by Moderator

To: romanesq; cardinal4

Watch the video here.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/05/31/haditha/index.html

Video on lower right hand side of the screen. Called "Haditha Uncovered.

Perhaps someone can explain to me the logical and factual flaws in the "Iraqi Civilian Right Groups" "story. How can these facts be logically reconciled with what the Iraqis, and some supposed Freepers, are accusing the Marines of doing?

To Quote Time:

"According to published reports, a number of Marines from the storied 3rd Battalion, 1st Marines, 1st Marine Division are accused killing more than 20 Iraqi civilians in retaliation for the death of one of their comrades by a roadside bomb in November, 2005."

Okie, 20 Dead Civilians. Which we are told were all shot thus supposedly proving "the Marines falsified the original report". So what could just be an honest mistake between a Marine's assumption on the spot of cause of death in his After Action Report (We didn't fire up the building, they were dead, must of been the bomb shrapnel) with a medical examiners report filed after a autopsies is NOW claimed by the accusers as"proof" that the "Marines Lied".

Ok so the accusation is they were all shot to death at short range in a building that had not been penetrated by any rounds from outside. No bullet holes in the building, must mean it was not Collateral Damage but a deliberate act is the accusers claims. In other words the accusers claim the Marines shot to death the Iraqis inside the building as a deliberate act not an accident of war. In fact, Some are running around claiming a shrapnel wound is so obviously different that a Combat Infantry Marine would know the difference between the two. Leave aside the obviously question why would Infantry Marine would be examining the wounds of dead Civilians, lets assume, that is correct.

Ok, then how come the "survivors" as interviewed for CNN by the "Iraqi Civil Rights group" are making such obviously absurd claims on the video?

"They burned the room with my father in it then threw a bomb"? Neat trick that. How they "Burn the room"? We don't use flame throwers. "Threw a bomb" but the accusers are telling us it all gun shot wounds. "a Bomb" inflict shrapnel wounds.

Notice also the mannerism of the "children survivors". Having come thru what would of been the most terrifying event of their lives and being forced to talk about it again, yet the kids show no hesitation or emotion. Just a dull recital of supposed "Facts" as if they were reciting a story as an memorization assignment in School. Very strange that. Absolutely no real emotion, just a breathless recital of "Facts" Then when done speaking look over to the person standing to the right of the camera (You can see his shadow behind the kids). Sure looks like kids looking at a teacher to see how they did in reciting their "lesson"

Then there is the part where the "Iraqi Civil Rights Group" filming the kids told the Iraqi boy to "show his wounds". It must not of occurred to the "Iraqi Civil Rights Group" making the video to consider the Iraqi boy's supposed "wound". Apparently no one bothered to think about where he was "shot". The supposed "wound" supposedly inflicted by US Marines at point blank range, (as claimed by the "Iraqi Civil Rights Group)" is directly over his spine. Yet when told he got up and turned around for the camera to "Show his wounds"?

If he HAD been shot there, he would be crippled for life, his spine severed just below the neck. So all this is being based on the claims of an "Iraqi Civil Rights Group" which are demonstrated to be lying. Since they lied about this, what ELSE might they have lied about? So maybe some one can explain these inconsistencies in the "witnesses" testimony? Some "Americans", especially in the Junk Media, maybe want to rethink their rush to judgment on these Marines


106 posted on 06/03/2006 10:34:53 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (I would rather be an Iraqi in a Hidatha guarded by Marines, then a subject of Al-Qeda anywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
"The bomb [then] exploded," she explained. "The bomb struck an armored vehicle. I don't know if it was a Humvee or an armored vehicle. When the bomb exploded, they came straight to my house."

Why did they go straight to HER house? Was it the only house in the area?

107 posted on 06/03/2006 10:37:46 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Watch the video by the "Iraqi Civil Rights Group" here.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/05/31/haditha/index.html

Video on lower right hand side of the screen. Called "Haditha Uncovered.

Even by the admitted ultra low standards of the American Big "News" media this is pretty obvious propaganda.

You tell me how the Iraqi boy in the video got shot by US Marines right over his spine and isn't at a minimum crippled for life, and maybe I will doubt. Until someone can explain this miraculous recovery, I say PURE BS. Terrorist Propaganda swallowed hook, line and sinker by the Hate America Leftist and their Junk Journalist Toady's.
108 posted on 06/03/2006 10:38:51 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (I would rather be an Iraqi in a Hidatha guarded by Marines, then a subject of Al-Qeda anywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

Godspeed.


109 posted on 06/03/2006 10:47:49 AM PDT by SE Mom (God Bless those who serve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
Sorry I didn't Ping you. My apologies.

I'm praying that the Marines in question won't be thrown under the bus by the politicos who are trying to score points for their efforts.

110 posted on 06/03/2006 10:49:52 AM PDT by Maigrey (FRiends don't let FRiends stay stuck on Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: MilspecRob
Why so, after all she's seen them for years?

It just strikes me as odd how she referred to them as an 'armored vehicle' and a 'humvee'. If she had said a 'tank' or a 'truck', fine...but the terms she used are very precise for a 12 year old Iraqi girl.

111 posted on 06/03/2006 10:53:58 AM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey

No apologies required. I just respond when I see my name. 8)


112 posted on 06/03/2006 10:54:12 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: romanesq
...the king whopper is the Arab Sunni Baathist liar...

No Shiite...

113 posted on 06/03/2006 11:06:36 AM PDT by TXnMA (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Repeat San Jacinto!!! AND START IN AUSTIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax

If this is true, it is no reason to kill children. Still, being in the situation is different from discussing it from our safe comfortable homes. I can see the other side. How some marines could have "lost it" in the heat of the passion. Sad all around.

If they did do this, it was wrong. But it was more wrong for the adults of this household to put their children and other family members at such risk. At the very least, they should have moved family out of harm's way if they are going to be war participants. You don't go to war hiding behind your children.


114 posted on 06/03/2006 11:27:20 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Re: I'm trying to piece together the actual facts about the event.
I'm happy you posted this:


1. Everyone agrees this started with an IED explosion crippling a US vehicle.
2. There is no doubt that the IED attack killed one of our troops and wounded at least one other.

3. There are reports of a firefight.

4. There are reports of dead civilians.



We all agree on the facts.

The key part about the IED killing one American, and rendering the other American soldier on conscious is that this is the moment of enemy contact. When contact with the enemy is made, the rest of the team have an obligation to fight through the ambush and secure the bodies of the wounded and dead. This is no small thing. One of our guys, in an interview by a NBC affiliate recalls the IED going off, his driver being killed, and he woke up in the hospital 24 hours later, thanks to the rest of his team.

When 2 members of your team have been rendered combat ineffective by enemy contact, 1 wounded, the other dead, the rest of the team are obligated to go lethal.

In the weeks and months ahead, many people will attempt to over look these facts, and we should not let them.

The IED was the Atrocity, and that's the reality.

115 posted on 06/03/2006 11:31:32 AM PDT by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax

The plot thickens...


116 posted on 06/03/2006 11:48:12 AM PDT by veronica ("A person needs a sense of mission like the air he breathes...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
The way that this "story" is starting to unravel leads me the conclusion that one (or more) of the Marines involved in the alleged incident must have said something that at least appeared to incriminate him/them. If not, then I can only assume that the previous "investigations" were extremely cursory, and don't match the "evidentiary" standards that would get someone convicted in a US court (civilian or military). In other words, the only reason this "investigation" hasn't already been dropped is Iraqi "political" sensibilities. What amazes me is how the Iraqi Police are always "johnny on the spot" for these "massacres" in areas that they're otherwise afraid to be seen.
117 posted on 06/03/2006 11:48:23 AM PDT by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax

This statement by the "witness" raises all sorts of doubts about the credibility of the Murtha-jihadist propaganda version of the story, as you well know. If a 12 year old knew about the IED then others in the house surely did, too. Were some of her family members involved, or did they 'merely' see the jihadists setting up the IED? They knew a 500 lb. bomb was going to go off in front of their house and they did not flee the area?????? Anyone would know that all hell would break loose after the explosion, with a likely firefight and home searches, etc. Either the family was being kept their against their will in order to become victims, or else they were part of the plot. This all smells like a jihadist agit-prop set-up.


118 posted on 06/03/2006 12:24:08 PM PDT by Enchante (General Hayden: I've Never Taken a Domestic Flight That Landed in Waziristan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jude24
You don't believe in innocent until proven guilty? Have you not read ANY of these threads? This girl's (12 or 13 yrs. old) story has changed several times at this point: she was saved by a) her brother falling on her, b) her sister falling on her (with blood spurting), c) her mother falling on her (who's blood spurted on her so the Marines thought she was dead) d)she hid in the bathtub, e) her sister was shot in the head 7 times (which means her sister wouldn't HAVE a head left), f) her brother (was this the one who fell on her in other versions?) was drug from underneath the bed and shot, g)she was in her room getting ready for school (even though she wasn't going to school because she knew about the bomb).

Now if this were a 5 or 6 year old I could understand the confusion but a child of this age would KNOW which family member fell on her, would KNOW whether she was in the bathroom, kitchen or living room, would KNOW and thus have stated from the beginning that her sister was shot in the head 7 times (rather interesting she only now remembers this event in enough detail to count the number of shots but can't seem to remember WHO, if anyone, fell on her and saved her life).

I don't expect anyone to remember these kinds of traumatic events perfectly, but PLEASE, there's just NO WAY her story would change this much. That ANYONE would believe the (CHANGING) story of a girl, a "doctor" & "photographer" (both held by US as terrorist sympathizers or worse, thus having a grudge) and the MSM over a Marine is just astounding. So tell me, just what is it that makes you inclined to believe these Marines are coldblooded killers of innocent Iraqi's? I seen a ton of information posted that certainly casts doubt on the veracity of the Hadithan's version of events, but little that supports it. So just what "facts" make you believe the stories in the press? Where's your "proof" of a slaughter? Time for you to put up.

Cindie

119 posted on 06/03/2006 12:27:13 PM PDT by gardencatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

Q: What's worse than a lying lawyer?

A: A lying Baath-jihadist scumbag of a lawyer.


120 posted on 06/03/2006 12:29:56 PM PDT by Enchante (General Hayden: I've Never Taken a Domestic Flight That Landed in Waziristan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: geezerwheezer

If the civilians become willing part of the cover and concealment of the enemy, they thereby become active combatants. In Viet Nam we had children ride bicycles with backpacks full of explosives (satchel bombs) so the could get close enough to the GI's to throw in a tent or something like that. What the left dosen't understand is that you can't fight a gorilla force with conventional methods and rules of engagement.


121 posted on 06/03/2006 12:31:33 PM PDT by scannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

"You don't go to war hiding behind your children."
They do! They'll just get another "wife/slave" and make some more. No big deal!


122 posted on 06/03/2006 12:36:11 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: jude24
nothing justifies slaughtering them

There is no evidence yet released that anyone was slaughtered.

In fact, they will not even have bodies, if you believe this morning's news. The family will not permit them to be exhumed.

Let's determine: (1) That these GI's actually killed someone, and (2) That there was no battlefield explanation that mitigates the killing.

123 posted on 06/03/2006 12:55:40 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4; Carl/NewsMax
Strange wording.

The child was probably speaking Arabic, don't you think? This is a translation.

Since NewsMax probably doesn't have too many reporters on the scene, I wonder where they got this account.
124 posted on 06/03/2006 12:58:39 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

I disagree. Translation or not, I dont buy the reptitve use of the the term "US Military". Nor do I buy the childs knowledge of US Military vehicles. It was coached. This whole story is starting to stink..


125 posted on 06/03/2006 1:02:49 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Kerry-Mcarthy-Gore-Clinton-Feingold-Murtha- Pelosi-the true Axis of Evil...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8
If she knew the IED was going to explode, and the Marines came straight to her house- I wonder if the Marines have a way to electronically trace a detonator? Sounds to me like they went right to the source.

A simpler explanation is that after the IED blast, the Marines took fire from the house, and/or those nearby. IIRC, that's more or less what they reported.

126 posted on 06/03/2006 3:02:23 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
Strange wording. Sounds coached to me, a 12 year old would have just called them soldiers, IMHO..

I wouldn't put much store in the "quotations" since it's unlikely she spoke in English. The translator may not have been of the highest quality. There are only so many English speakers to go around, and this reporter may have gotten stuck with a real dufus. Plus the possibility that the translator, like the original reporter, and the doctor who signed the death certificates, is in thrall to the terrorists, or is one of them.

127 posted on 06/03/2006 3:09:35 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup

I found this article from October 7, 2005 via CNN. It was written by Arwa Damon, the CNN reporter who spoke out on behalf of the soldiers in Haditha. Read this and tell me if the civilians in the city of Haditha are just innocent bystanders...

http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/10/07/iraq.haditha

The REAL Haditha -
http://www.chickenhawkexpress.blogspot.com


128 posted on 06/03/2006 3:11:59 PM PDT by Chickenhawk Warmonger (All aboard the Chickenhawk Express... www.chickenhawkexpress.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
How are these things detonated? By some kind of radio transmitter...or even a cell phone? Does the one pressing the button need to be near the device that's to explode?

Not because of the technology of the device used to set it off, except that it's not one used in a regular military mine. Rather because in absence of some sort of vehicle detection device (like a pressure detonator or magnetic influence detonator) the person pushing the button, or throwing the switch (It could be a wired system) must have a line of sight to the device, so that he or she can know when to set it off.

129 posted on 06/03/2006 3:13:14 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
"Why did they go straight to HER house? Was it the only house in the area?"

This is the first house. The one the shots on the Marines came from when after the bomb went off. The terrorists retreated before the Marines got there.

130 posted on 06/03/2006 3:14:00 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Unearth, hell! Who would be suprised to discover that CNN knew about the bomb ahead of time too?
131 posted on 06/03/2006 3:20:50 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (Dear US Senators, Reps. and Mr. President: Why are y'all abetting the destruction of our culture?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sanjacjake
Have the bullets been taken from these bodies and checked out?

No, but about one could tell would be the caliber of weapon used. You could probably tell the difference between 5.56 and 5.54 mm rounds, but maybe not. But most Iraqi AKs are chambered for the older 7.62x39 round, and that could be distinguished. Of course nothing says the Jihadies don't have a few M-16s or AR-15s, captured, bought on the open market, or gotten as a gift from the Palistinians, who use them routinely, thanks to the Impeached One.

You can't match centerfire rifle bullets to the individual weapon nearly as easily as with pistol bullets.

132 posted on 06/03/2006 3:27:03 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4

Maybe not even soldiers...I could hear her just saying "Americans"...

This is a VERY coached child...

I would also hear her describing the vehicle that was blown up by the IED, a "truck"..which is probably what I would call it...if called upon to just tell what I saw or knew about.


133 posted on 06/03/2006 3:28:00 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
ya know if any of these clowns in journalism had ever served a day in uniform much less combat; they wouldn't dream of writing such trash!

Amen brother. Most of them don't seem to have the proper equipment tween thier legs.

134 posted on 06/03/2006 3:29:40 PM PDT by navyblue (at one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SWEET OLD BILL
The Marines have been unable to exhume the bodies, which would prove or disprove guilt and they have the weapons in question

Maybe not, nothing says the Jihadies might not have a few M-16s or AR-15s (or anything else that fires the 5.56 NATO round), and it's very difficult to match high speed rifle bullets to the weapon which fired them, as can usually be done with pistol bullets.

135 posted on 06/03/2006 3:30:28 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

The more I read about this the more I don't believe it.....I just can't believe that these Marines would shoot women and children in the head several times....no one can convince me of this...


136 posted on 06/03/2006 3:33:18 PM PDT by mystery-ak (Army Wife and Army Mother.....toughest job in the military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly

She is only 12 years old and should not be called a co-conspirator. She is a victim of the whims of the male adult relatives that conspired to kill our boys. The fault should be laid at her relative's feet.


137 posted on 06/03/2006 3:34:26 PM PDT by brwnsuga (Black, Proud, Conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: romanesq
Agreed brother, thus my illustration. If there's one thing you can on with an Arab it's lying and if it's another it's Arab Sunni lying but the king whopper is the Arab Sunni Baathist liar.

Q. How do you know when an Arab is lying?

A. His lips are moving!

138 posted on 06/03/2006 3:34:38 PM PDT by navyblue (at one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger

Thanks for posting. I think the civilians may have been duped into acting on behalf of the terrorists. This story has gotten more legs than any car bomb set off. Maybe AQ has discovered a new tactic?


139 posted on 06/03/2006 3:39:38 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax

I hope there is some reason for the killing. Did the Marines have reason to suspect that someone in the house was about to set off another explosion inside the house?


140 posted on 06/03/2006 3:40:08 PM PDT by 1955Ford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak

I think I said that the first time I posted on a thread about this...and I have read more to convince me I am RIGHT...than to convince me these Marines are guilty.

Ironically, I was just watching a discussion of this on Newswatch on Fox News...and Eric Burns, the moderator made this "final comment" ..

He said that these "type" of situations are more likely to be "shown" to have happened because of the this NEW one...and he mentioned the one that came up yesterday in the news where the American troops were found INNOCENT!!!

I know they film this show on Friday...but, I find it funny that Burns uses that incident as proof that the Americans were guilty of more than Haditha....LOL


141 posted on 06/03/2006 3:41:55 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
If the Iraqis won't exhume, the prosecution really doesn't have a case.

That's true in a court of law. However, not true in the court of world opinion.

It sucks! I know, but beleive me, I'm on your side.

142 posted on 06/03/2006 3:47:56 PM PDT by navyblue (at one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
1. Everyone agrees this started with an IED explosion crippling a US vehicle.

Reported US Military Deaths in Haditha, Iraq (notice that no US Military deaths have been reported since the cold blooded murder of US Lance Corporal Miguel Terrazas on Nov 19, 2005)

Apr 3, 2003 Haditha

 US Captain Russell Brian Rippetoe SW of Haditha Dam - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - suicide bomber 
  US Specialist Ryan Patrick Long SW of Haditha Dam - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - suicide bomber 
  US Staff Sergeant Nino Dugue Livaudais SW of Haditha Dam - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - suicide bomber 

May 26, 2003 Haditha

US Major Matthew E. Schram Hadithah - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire 

Nov. 29, 2003 Haditha

US Staff Sergeant Stephen A. Bertolino Hadithah - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - ambush 
  US Specialist Aaron J. Sissel Hadithah - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - ambush 

US Sergeant Jesse W. Strong Hadithah - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - RPG attack 
  US Lance Corporal Karl R. Linn Hadithah - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - RPG attack 
  US Corporal Jonathan W. Bowling Hadithah - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - RPG attack 

May 7, 2005 Haditha

 US Sergeant Michael A. Marzano Hadithah - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - suicide car bomb 
  US Sergeant Aaron N. Cepeda Sr. Hadithah - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - suicide car bomb 
  US Lance Corporal Lance Tanner Graham Hadithah - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - suicide car bomb 
  US Petty Officer 3rd Class Jeffery L. Wiener Hadithah - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - suicide car bomb 

May 25,2005 Haditha

US Sergeant David Neil Wimberg Hadithah - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire 

May 26,2005 Haditha

 US Major Ricardo A. Crocker Hadithah - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - RPG attack 

Aug 1, 2005 Haditha

US Lance Corporal Roger D. Castleberry Jr. Haditha (near) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire 
  US Sergeant David J. Coullard Haditha (near) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire 
  US Lance Corporal Daniel Nathan Deyarmin Jr. Haditha (near) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire 
  US Corporal Jeffrey A. Boskovitch Haditha (near) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire 
  US Lance Corporal Brian P. Montgomery Haditha (near) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire 
  US Sergeant Nathaniel S. Rock Haditha (near) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire 

Aug 3, 2005 Haditha

    
  US Lance Corporal Adam J. Strain Ramadi - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire 
  US Specialist Mathew V. Gibbs Baghdad (southwest part) Hostile - hostile fire - car bomb 
  US Sergeant 1st Class Charles Houghton Warren Baghdad (southwest part) Hostile - hostile fire - car bomb 
  US Specialist Jerry Lewis Ganey Jr. Baghdad (southwest part) Hostile - hostile fire - car bomb 
  US Lance Corporal Nicholas William B. Bloem Haditha (2 km S of) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack 
  US Corporal David S. Stewart Haditha (2 km S of) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack 
  US Sergeant Bradley J. Harper Haditha (2 km S of) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack 
  US Lance Corporal Kevin G. Waruinge Haditha (2 km S of) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack 
  US Lance Corporal Grant B. Fraser Haditha (2 km S of) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack 
  US Sergeant Justin F. Hoffman Haditha (2 km S of) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack 
  US Lance Corporal Eric J. Bernholtz Haditha (2 km S of) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack 
  US Lance Corporal Aaron H. Reed Haditha (2 km S of) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack 
  US Corporal David Kenneth J. Kreuter Haditha (2 km S of) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack 
  US Lance Corporal William Brett Wightman Haditha (2 km S of) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack 
  US Lance Corporal Christopher Jenkins Dyer Haditha (2 km S of) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack 
  US Lance Corporal Michael J. Cifuentes Haditha (2 km S of) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack 
  US Lance Corporal Timothy Michael Bell Jr. Haditha (2 km S of) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack 
  US Lance Corporal Edward August Schroeder II Haditha (2 km S of) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack 

Nov. 16, 2005 Haditha

 US Sergeant Jeremy E. Murray Haditha (near) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack 

Nov 19, 2006 Haditha

US Lance Corporal Miguel Terrazas Haditha (near) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack 


143 posted on 06/03/2006 4:10:40 PM PDT by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

This story stinks. Im watching local STL news, who usually is gleeful about reporting badly on Iraq. 13 minutes into the news cycle, no mention of anything related to Iraq. Except one-Sgt. Amanda Pinson, who was killed in Balad in March. The story was about a plaque that was placed in her honor at her former High School. When KSDK wont lead with the story, much less comment on it, it makes me wonder why the AP is all over it. I will no longer "wait for the outcome of the investigation". I dont believe it at all..


144 posted on 06/03/2006 4:16:50 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Kerry-Mcarthy-Gore-Clinton-Feingold-Murtha- Pelosi-the true Axis of Evil...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
You don't go to war hiding behind your children

Jihadies do. In Israel, in Iraq, and in other places as well. It's apparently a Muslim thing, or at least an Arab Muslim thing. (Arabs being the prototype Muslims).

145 posted on 06/03/2006 4:20:39 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
I am not condoning the barbaric act of the killing of civilians. However, I am a little surprised that this bit of information is coming out. If this family knew about this ambush bombing, why didn't they alert the Marines?
I also understand that the Marines were fired upon directly after the bombing. The big question is, were the arms used by the terrorists policed up after the incident by the terrorists to make it appear that our soldiers killed wantonly? Isn't it possible that the terrorists killed these people using M16's to blame it on the Marines?
There are too many questions about this incident to blatantly crucify our men.
Also, isn't it funny that the civilians killed by the terrorists don't receive as much attention.
Why doesn't the MSM make big news out of those killings?
146 posted on 06/03/2006 4:22:50 PM PDT by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly

I say no one should draw conclusions from this until all the facts are in. It's innocent until proven guilty - not the reverse. If you've ever been a juror, you'd know how important that is.


147 posted on 06/03/2006 4:25:29 PM PDT by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
OMG TexKat that much action ? ! ! ! this is an outrage !

the entire town of 70,000 is guilty , Murtha should be flown in to oversee negotiations, then the troops withdrawn then entire town should be carpet bombed including Murtha and announced as a big "oops!!" like Clinton did after the Kosovo oopsies

I can't believe this is even happening

148 posted on 06/03/2006 4:26:57 PM PDT by KTM rider ( Support Our Troops Donate to Irey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

Who cares if civilians were casualties???? I mean really, who cares???? If we'd been leveling neighborhoods where these terrorists operate out of from the beginning, our troops would be home and taking care of the borders.
Collateral damage....it's just part of getting the job done.


149 posted on 06/03/2006 4:30:12 PM PDT by cowdog77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger
From your link to the CNN article. Thanks for posting it.

With their American advisers, Iraqi Special Forces searched a three-house compound behind the mosque and detained three individuals -- two elderly men who work at the mosque and a younger man, a relative. All pleaded their innocence.

"All we do here is turn on the call to prayer. If I had seen this here, I would have reported it," one man said. "We hate death, we are pained by it. I wouldn't even hurt an ant." He suggested men had come at night and buried the explosives.

After more questioning, the man said they were told "not to come to the shrine anymore." Pressed on who "they" were, he claimed not to know, saying they were people who frequented the mosque. Marines detained the three for questioning.

150 posted on 06/03/2006 4:30:39 PM PDT by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson