To: muir_redwoods
Many traditionalists don't like the implications of libertarian ideas but very few have cogent arguments against them.I really believe that there is a difference between a (L)ibertarian and (l)ibertarian. I fall into the class of (l)ibertarian because I do not agree with everything the (L)ibertarians espouse to. But if I register as a voter my party affiliation would be Republican because there is not (l)ibertarian party.
To: taxesareforever
If you look at the Libertarian platform, there is little to separate them from liberals except they like guns and don't like taxes. Everything else is about the same.
I think "Liberal-terriors" would be a better name.
22 posted on
06/04/2006 5:52:21 PM PDT by
Beagle8U
(Juan Williams....The DNC's "Crash test Dummy" for talking points.)
To: taxesareforever
I really believe that there is a difference between a (L)ibertarian and (l)ibertarian. It's a HUGE difference. The (L) version is merely an anarchist. The (l) version is true to the founding ideals of this nation... perhaps the only ones left who are.
83 posted on
06/04/2006 10:18:51 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(A thread without a comment on immigration is not complete)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson