Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muir_redwoods
Many traditionalists don't like the implications of libertarian ideas but very few have cogent arguments against them.

I really believe that there is a difference between a (L)ibertarian and (l)ibertarian. I fall into the class of (l)ibertarian because I do not agree with everything the (L)ibertarians espouse to. But if I register as a voter my party affiliation would be Republican because there is not (l)ibertarian party.

20 posted on 06/04/2006 5:38:23 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: taxesareforever
If you look at the Libertarian platform, there is little to separate them from liberals except they like guns and don't like taxes. Everything else is about the same.

I think "Liberal-terriors" would be a better name.
22 posted on 06/04/2006 5:52:21 PM PDT by Beagle8U (Juan Williams....The DNC's "Crash test Dummy" for talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: taxesareforever
I really believe that there is a difference between a (L)ibertarian and (l)ibertarian.

It's a HUGE difference. The (L) version is merely an anarchist. The (l) version is true to the founding ideals of this nation... perhaps the only ones left who are.

83 posted on 06/04/2006 10:18:51 PM PDT by thoughtomator (A thread without a comment on immigration is not complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson