Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Special forces to use strap-on 'stealth wings'
Daily Mail ^ | 6/6/6 | Hickley

Posted on 06/06/2006 9:10:01 AM PDT by worldclass

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: martin_fierro

To infinity ... and beyond!!!!


61 posted on 06/06/2006 10:07:07 AM PDT by jimfree (Freep and ye shall find)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

To infinity ... and beyond!!!!


62 posted on 06/06/2006 10:07:12 AM PDT by jimfree (Freep and ye shall find)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
Along with one of these........


63 posted on 06/06/2006 10:08:12 AM PDT by Sarajevo (Life is a sexually transmitted disease. -R. D. Laing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

You sure the thrust figure is right on that? 35 pounds doesn't sound like a lot. Then again, I'm no aeronautical engineer. Just curious.


64 posted on 06/06/2006 10:17:07 AM PDT by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: posterchild
"Either they will be dropped from higher altitudes, take advantage of high winds, or something else?

I imagine if you could release those guys at Mach 2 or 3, you get some distance on 'em. Sort like skimmin' a stone on a pond.

65 posted on 06/06/2006 10:36:00 AM PDT by Cliff Dweller (No such thing as a threat... just targets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cliff Dweller

I imagine they would be knocked out on contact with a mach 2 or 3 slipstream. To be followed shortly thereafter by a bloody crater.


66 posted on 06/06/2006 10:41:45 AM PDT by conservativewasp (Liberals lie for sport and hate our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Cliff Dweller
I'm not certain, but I think that if one exited the aircraft at that speed (mach 2 or 3) without some sort of protective shell, they'd be ripped apart!

I'd like at my buddy and say... "You go first."

67 posted on 06/06/2006 10:58:52 AM PDT by Toadman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet


She'd be first in line for a little experimental action...ha!


68 posted on 06/06/2006 11:07:26 AM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AndrewB


Clever. This thread could inspire a lot of foul creative thinking. :-)


69 posted on 06/06/2006 11:08:12 AM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: conservativewasp; Toadman
Yes I know you couldn't release them at that speed safely... I probably shouldn't have left off the /sarc tag.

I was just following up on the next Mad Invention idea

70 posted on 06/06/2006 11:21:35 AM PDT by Cliff Dweller (No such thing as a threat... just targets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Jumpmaster
"BATTALION sized flocks won't fly into anything but each other!"

Sure, let's say we can't do it.

71 posted on 06/06/2006 11:30:38 AM PDT by lormand (Understanding the threat of Islamofasicsm is essential to survival)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: worldclass

I want that!


72 posted on 06/06/2006 1:17:56 PM PDT by zeugma (I reject your reality and substitute my own in its place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JewishRighter
35 lbs is plenty if you have the lift.

Movie of Jet Sailplane in flight: http://www.silentwingsairshows.com/video/twinjet_1.wmv


73 posted on 06/06/2006 1:31:34 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: conservativewasp; Toadman

discovery channel's survivior show did a piece on an airplane where the pilot got sucked out the window and stuck on the nose of the plane.

the co pilot landed it and assumed the pilot would be dead

he survived quite nicely at about 500 mph.


74 posted on 06/06/2006 1:41:29 PM PDT by staytrue (Moonbat conservatives-those who would rather have the democrats win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Question, please, from someone whoknows next-to-nothing about aerodynamics and flight. This wing is a small, but rigid structure..so don't you have to figure out variances for different sizes and weights of the troopers, in terms of center of gravity, stability, and distance than can be achieved..I mean..if one soldier was 6'4", 230lbs..and the other was 5'9", 160...the performance characteristics are gonna be very different, aren't they?


75 posted on 06/06/2006 1:47:33 PM PDT by ken5050 (GWB, Reagan, Thatcher, Pope John Paul II, freed hundreds of millions.# of Nobel PeacePrizes: ZERO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
Are you thinking of Lt. Keith Gallagher and his partial ejection from a KA-6D? Excellent read at the link provided.


76 posted on 06/06/2006 2:12:54 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: worldclass

I could swear I remember seeing this in James Bond movie a few years ago.


77 posted on 06/06/2006 2:14:22 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Every person has a photographic memory - but some don't have their flash card installed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

From one person who knows next to nothing to another:

It doesn't matter if the wing is rigid or not. You could be talking about a hang glider with a nylon wing.

The different weights will affect the wing loading of the structure, so there will be performance differences between jumpers of different weights. How much of a difference I couldn't say. The main difference will be the glide ratio, but you're talking differences of a few percent, not vastly different performances.

This proposal also states that it can carry up to 200 lbs of equipment along with the jumper, so it is possible that the maximum allowable payload is adjusted to compensate for the weight of the jumper.


78 posted on 06/06/2006 2:17:51 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Awesome!! Thanks for the answer and the cool pic.


79 posted on 06/06/2006 5:43:43 PM PDT by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
"he survived quite nicely at about 500 mph"

I wouldn't use those words myself, but thank God he survived!

I'm not sure what the speed of sound is at sea level but I think it's around 700 mph +

Now imagine exiting an aircraft at 2 to 3 times that speed. Perhaps one could exit from relative zero speed into a 1500+ mph slip stream, but my spidey senses tell me otherwise.

80 posted on 06/06/2006 6:35:54 PM PDT by Toadman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson