Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the invisib1e hand; Doe Eyes
What wanton presumption you exercise to make such a remark! How would you know what I'm "content" to do?

Perhaps Doe Eyes, like I, merely took your statement at face value, and came to the obvious conclusion.....

However, if you'd care to modify your comment into something with actual intellectual content, I'd be happy to revise my opinion.

48 posted on 06/07/2006 7:29:34 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
I would say rather that you interpreted my remarks according very limited, colloquial definitions of the terms.

I believe that half the burden of clear communication belongs to the hearer. Somewhere along the line someone apparently convinced you two that "sound economic principles" were defined by apparent immediate price advantage only (arbitrage), completely devoid of accountability to moral ramifications. And that may be what passes these days for "economics." But it is not a true definition.

49 posted on 06/07/2006 12:12:33 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand ("....and the sun is eclipsed by the moon!" -- (Pink Floyd). But not for long!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson