Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

eBay Invites Internet Regulation, Backs Online Gambling Ban
Fox News ^ | June 7, 2006 | Radley Balko

Posted on 06/08/2006 10:59:30 AM PDT by seacapn

Rep. Bob Goodlatte is in the process of pushing through Congress a bill that would "ban" Internet gambling. I've previously explained why the bill is bad public policy.

But since that column, it has come to light that online auction giant eBay has thrown its support behind Goodlatte's efforts. Why would an Internet company open its arms to congressional regulation of the Internet?

Some speculate that eBay is attempting to win favor with Goodlatte, who also happens to sit on the Congressional Internet Caucus. There's probably some truth to that. But there's another, more likely explanation for eBay selling out the e-commerce world: Good, old-fashioned protectionism.

The funny thing is, even as eBay has joined Rep. Goodlatte's moral crusade against gambling, the company's overseas operations are moving into the gaming business. According to the gaming industry publication igamingnews.com, PayPal Europe has recently entered into agreements with two online gambling services to allow PayPal to be used by Europeans who want to gamble online.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: ebay; gambling; goodlatte; internet; nannystate; paypal
An excellent article that goes through eBay and PayPal's self-serving, protectionist support for an online gambling ban, going so far as to call for the PROSECUTION of individual gamblers.

If there are any VA 6th District Freepers out there, let Rep. Bob Goodlatte know that his nanny-statism isn't appreciated. Seems like he's as bought and paid-for as they come in Washington.

1 posted on 06/08/2006 10:59:35 AM PDT by seacapn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: seacapn

BS. More regulation.


2 posted on 06/08/2006 11:02:17 AM PDT by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

GREaAT! now if they can just get their foot in the door, they can levy a tax on it next......


3 posted on 06/08/2006 11:04:16 AM PDT by Nightrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

First Senator Microsoft, now Representative E-Bay.


4 posted on 06/08/2006 11:09:40 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn
They can have my virtual cards when they pry them from my virtual fingers.

Probably wouldn't be that hard.

5 posted on 06/08/2006 11:15:35 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

this from a company that allows people to scam others using their services....


6 posted on 06/08/2006 11:16:30 AM PDT by fhlh (Polls are for Strippers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

How about a freeper poker game on the Internet?

My wife will be dealer, and she will email you what your cards are, awiting your betting instructions.

Really.

;-)


7 posted on 06/08/2006 11:51:54 AM PDT by Beelzebubba (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

Who gave the federal government the power to regulate the internet? Do they justify it by claiming that the internet involves interstate commerce?


8 posted on 06/08/2006 12:00:19 PM PDT by oblomov (Join the FR Folding@Home Team (#36120) keyword: folding@home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov
Who gave the federal government the power to regulate the internet? Do they justify it by claiming that the internet involves interstate commerce?

That's exactly the claim.

Some of the internet clearly does involve interstate commerce-- if I order merchandise from someone in another state, send them money, and they send me goods, that's interstate commerce, whether the order was transmitted over the internet, by mail or over a telephone wire.

The power grab will come when they start to argue (if they haven't already) that, because some commerce is transacted over the internet, everything on the internet can be regulated because it's a "medium of interstate commerce."

9 posted on 06/08/2006 12:07:10 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

bump. The train is rolling here, and a lot of people don't seem to be aware of what's happening. If they can do this, they'll start trying to regulate your use of the internet in other ways too. This should be of concern even if you're not into online card playing, etc.


10 posted on 06/08/2006 1:09:22 PM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

GREAT catch from an underrated writer (Balko).


11 posted on 06/08/2006 1:12:08 PM PDT by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

In this case, their rationale is that the Wire Act prohibits gambling by telephone, and that the internet, using telephone wires, is the same thing. There's more to it than that, but that's the gist of it as I understand.


12 posted on 06/08/2006 1:14:43 PM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kms61
If they can do this, they'll start trying to regulate your use of the internet in other ways too.

If that happens, I'll cut the fat pipe and use the PC for home networking and business apps.

I don't need the bloody internet.
I can quit any time I want to. Yeah. Any time at all.


13 posted on 06/08/2006 1:16:29 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (I can't complain...but sometimes I still do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kms61

You're right. The only way to enforce such a prohibition is to look deeper and deeper into people's internet browsing habits. Fishing expeditions will be launched; the laws will be arranged so that internet gamblers are in violation of untold money laundering and wire fraud statutes. The state can then jail them at will for indefinite periods of time. This certainly isn't our grandpa's GOP.


14 posted on 06/08/2006 1:19:50 PM PDT by seacapn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

I know there's a lot of other big news today, but I couldn't believe that this thread gathered so few responses. This should be a huge issue for people who believe that less government regulation is better than more government regulation. Goodlatte has been trying to get this passed for years, and it looks like he might have a chance this time.

A lot of people are going to be shocked at what comes of this down the road. This goes directly to whether the government can dictate how you spend your own money and what you can do with your own time. It doesn't get much more fundamental than that.


15 posted on 06/08/2006 1:32:49 PM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson