Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Their man in Baghdad (When facts are inconvenient, just ignore)
Weekly Standard ^ | 6-19-06 | Stephen F. Hayes

Posted on 06/10/2006 10:45:57 PM PDT by jwalburg

THE LAST QUESTION to General Bill Caldwell at his briefing last Thursday on the death of Abu Musab al Zarqawi came from New York Times reporter Richard Oppel, who wanted to know about Abu al-Masri, an Egyptian whom many expect to replace Zarqawi as the leader of al Qaeda in Iraq.

Said Caldwell: "Yeah, al Masri, Egyptian Arab. He's not an Iraqi. Born and raised in Egypt. He was trained in Afghanistan, went through his training there. We know he has been involved with IEDs and making here in Iraq. Probably came here around 2002 into Iraq, probably actually helped establish maybe the first al Qaeda cell that existed in the Baghdad area."

Huh? Doesn't Caldwell understand that there were no al Qaeda terrorists in Iraq before the U.S. invasion of March 2003? Everyone knows that terrorists flocked to Iraq only after the war began.

Reading the coverage of Zarqawi's death in the mainstream press one can understand why that myth persists. Many journalists either don't know or choose not to report the fact that Zarqawi was in Baghdad with two dozen al Qaeda associates nearly a year before the war.

It is a fact not seriously in dispute: Colin Powell cited it in his presentation at the United Nations before the war; the Senate Intelligence Committee confirmed it in its bipartisan review of Iraq war intelligence; General Tommy Franks noted in his book about the Iraq war that Zarqawi "had received medical treatment in Baghdad"; and the Jordanian government provided detailed information on Zarqawi's whereabouts to the Iraqi regime in June 2002, as Amman has since acknowledged.

Why, then, in its 35-point bulleted list of "Key Events in the Life of al-Zarqawi," did the New York Times fail to include the terrorist leader's time in Baghdad? And why, in his reflections on Zarqawi in Newsweek, did reporter Christopher Dickey mention that the Jordanian terrorist linked up "with a group of radical Islamists in the rough mountains of the Kurdish north, outside Saddam's control" but say nothing about his time in Saddam's Baghdad?

A Times news account by its superb Baghdad bureau chief, John Burns, noted Caldwell's answer to Oppel. But many news stories simply left out the fact that Zarqawi and his associates were operating openly in Baathist Iraq for months before the U.S. invasion in March 2003. Others went further. Associated Press writer Patrick Quinn suggested that Bush administration claims that Zarqawi was a link between Iraq and al Qaeda were deceptive.

"The myth-building around al Zarqawi began even before the war started in March 2003," he wrote. "A month earlier, then-Secretary of State Colin Powell told the U.N. Security Council that al Zarqawi's presence in Iraq was proof of Saddam Hussein's links to al Qaeda.

"That claim was later debunked by U.S. intelligence officials."

That's wrong. Not only was the claim never "debunked," it was confirmed by the Senate Intelligence Committee's July 2004 review of pre-Iraq war intelligence. On February 5, 2003, Powell told the Security Council that the United States was concerned about "the sinister nexus between Iraq and the al Qaeda terrorist network, a nexus that combines classic terrorist organizations and modern methods of murder. Iraq today harbors a deadly terrorist network headed by Abu Musab al Zarqawi, an associate and collaborator of Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda lieutenants."

TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; alqaida; baghdad; deceit; iraq; liberalmedia; oif; saddam; stephenfhayes; zarqawi
Sick to see that when the news doesn't fit modern journalists' templates, they refuse to report it. Omitting crucial information on a time line because it doesn't fit their myths, very sad.
1 posted on 06/10/2006 10:46:02 PM PDT by jwalburg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jwalburg

Missed the second page:
Powell described Zarqawi's training in Afghanistan, his experience working with chemical weapons, and a chemical weapons facility Zarqawi set up in northern Iraq.

Powell continued:

those helping to run this camp are Zarqawi lieutenants operating in northern Kurdish areas outside Saddam Hussein's controlled Iraq.
But Baghdad has an agent in the most senior levels of the radical organization, Ansar al-Islam, that controls this corner of Iraq. In 2000 this agent offered al Qaeda safe haven in the region. After we swept al Qaeda from Afghanistan, some of its members accepted this safe haven. They remain there today.

Zarqawi's activities are not confined to this small corner of northeast Iraq. He traveled to Baghdad in May 2002 for medical treatment, staying in the capital of Iraq for two months while he recuperated to fight another day.

During this stay, nearly two dozen extremists converged on Baghdad and established a base of operations there. These al Qaeda affiliates, based in Baghdad, now coordinate the movement of people, money and supplies into and throughout Iraq for his network, and they've now been operating freely in the capital for more than eight months.

Iraqi officials deny accusations of ties with al Qaeda. These denials are simply not credible. Last year an al Qaeda associate bragged that the situation in Iraq was, quote, "good," that Baghdad could be transited quickly.

We know these affiliates are connected to Zarqawi because they remain even today in regular contact with his direct subordinates, including the poison cell plotters, and they are involved in moving more than money
and materiel.

Powell noted that Zarqawi associates captured after the assassination of U.S. AID employee Laurence Foley, in Jordan, said they received arms from Zarqawi. And much of that operation was planned from Zarqawi's safe haven in regime-controlled Iraq.

The Senate Intelligence Committee found that "the information provided by the Central Intelligence Agency for the terrorism portion of Secretary Powell's speech was carefully vetted by both terrorism and region analysts" and that "none of the portrayals of the intelligence reporting included in Secretary Powell's speech differed in any significant way from earlier assessments published by the Central Intelligence Agency."

In fact, the CIA had known of Zarqawi's relationship with Iraqi Intelligence since March 2002, when al Qaeda operations chief Abu Zubaydah volunteered that information to interrogators in a debriefing upon his capture. Zubaydah said in the interview that Osama bin Laden opposed a "formal alliance" with Saddam Hussein, though he conceded that he would not necessarily know if such a relationship existed. In that same debriefing, however, Zubaydah told the Americans that Zarqawi had good relations with Iraqi Intelligence.

Zubaydah would know that. Zubaydah had known the Jordanian terror leader for years, and together they had plotted to bomb the Radisson Hotel in Amman, Jordan, popular with Americans, on the millennium. They were both later tried in absentia for the thwarted attack.

Zarqawi ran a terrorist training camp in Herat, Afghanistan, before moving to Iraq after the U.S. invasion. Operatives from Jordan's intelligence service, the GID, followed him. The Senate Intelligence Committee, referring to the Jordanians as a "foreign government service," discussed these events in its July 2004 report. "The Iraqi regime was, at a minimum, aware of al Zarqawi's presence in Baghdad in 2002 because a foreign government service passed [redacted] information regarding his whereabouts to Iraqi authorities in June 2002." The Senate report confirmed Powell's claims that Zarqawi was operating in regime-controlled Iraq. "Al Zarqawi and his network were operating both in Baghdad and in the Kurdish-controlled region of Iraq."

More recently, a "Jordanian security official" spoke to the Washington Post. "There is proof that he was in Iraq during that time," the official said. "We sent many memos to Iraq during this time, asking them to identify his position, where he was, how he got weapons, how he smuggled them across the border."

The Post account continues:

Hussein's government never responded, according to the official, who added that documents recovered after its overthrow in 2003 show that Iraqi agents did detain some Zarqawi operatives but released them after questioning. Furthermore, the Iraqis warned the Zarqawi operatives that the Jordanians knew where they were, he said. After he recovered from his injuries, Zarqawi continued to cross borders in the region frequently, using disguises and fake passports to stay one step ahead of the Jordanians.

Why would the Iraqis detain Zarqawi associates only to release them with a warning that the Jordanians were on their trail? According to former and current U.S. military officials, the foreign jihadists were swept up in a broader crackdown on Iraqi religious extremists. But that was not the end of the story. The foreigners were soon released following a directive issued by the office of Iraqi president Saddam Hussein. (Most leaks to the media about the detentions apparently omitted that interesting fact.)

The death of the savage fanatic Zarqawi reminds us why we are fighting. A look back at his career after Afghanistan reminds us why we are fighting in Iraq.

2 posted on 06/10/2006 10:47:07 PM PDT by jwalburg (If I have not seen as far as others, it is because of the giants standing on my shoulders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg

Blows away the liberal distinction between the War on Terrorism and War in Iraq bump.

3 posted on 06/10/2006 10:53:55 PM PDT by Kryptonite (McCain, Graham, Warner, Snowe, Collins, DeWine, Chafee - put them in your sights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg

Thanks for the post!

4 posted on 06/10/2006 11:02:59 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN..Support our Troops! and - Now more than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
The death of the savage fanatic Zarqawi reminds us why we are fighting. A look back at his career after Afghanistan reminds us why we are fighting in Iraq.

"Us" being most reasonable U.S. citizens. As opposed to media whores like Michael Moore or ms. Sheehan. People whose thought process (what there is of one) is "Gotta bash Bush, Gotta bash Bush, Gotta bash Bush. Then there's Murtha, dimwit that he is, who will spin this into another reason we must pullout now.

I say, good job guys!

5 posted on 06/11/2006 1:11:11 AM PDT by Madstrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg

We are Pravda... You vill believe what we report... pay no attention to facts you vill believe what we report... You are getting most sleepy now... There is no terror, George Bush Lied, there is no terror Michael Moore is good, go back to sleep.. 911 is just a number. Hollywood is great.. nothing happened on 911...go back to sleep... No Iraq, Al-Qaeda ties.... No WMD... go to sleep... It's all Bush's fault...and by the way the economy sucks....

6 posted on 06/11/2006 4:38:41 AM PDT by tomnbeverly (I am pissed off at the President cause he hasn't cured cancer yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg

Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was involved with the Ansar al-Islam in Iraq over a year before the invasion commenced, Ansar al-Islam is recognized internationally as a terrorist group and is credited with killing many Kurds in the north, as well as being supportive of the Ba'athist regime up until and after the invasion in 2003.

But don't tell that to liberal journalists, otherwise you are an imperialist, right-wing, racist, biggot, close minded, class enemy. You have to be 'open minded' when liberals make shithead comments but if a conservative displays a fact you have to discrad him/her as a 'FOX News Watcher'.

I am starting to believe Ann Coulter's statement of liberal infallibilty more and more, they are so arrogant it's amazing.

7 posted on 06/11/2006 7:32:34 AM PDT by Xing Daorong ("All that is nessessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."-Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg

In plain English, Saddam Hussein was providing a safe haven and training ground for terrorists prior to 9/11/01. There's more, such as Iraq supplying the chemicals to bomb the US Embassy in Kenya, Iraqi involvement in the first bombing of the World Trade Center, and the presence of an Iraqi intelligence agent at a Kuala Lumpur meeting which took place to plan for 9/11/01.

8 posted on 06/18/2006 11:14:07 AM PDT by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson