Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/11/2006 7:14:25 PM PDT by World_Events
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: World_Events

Well .. Bush may enforce the ban .. BUT IT WAS THEIR FAVORITE PRESIDENT - ["I didn't kill the kid"] BILL CLINTON - WHO WROTE THE EO.

Bill Clinton didn't want the public to see the bodies of our brave soldiers he had recklessly sent into battle .. with NO PLAN FOR VICTORY .. and because Clinton didn't want to take the heat for their deaths.


41 posted on 06/11/2006 8:05:45 PM PDT by CyberAnt (US Military: Raining fire from above for the freedom that we love!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events
I feel that people will be interested in seeing the story of the human cost of this" war,

Oh, like he knows all about dealing with the war on a personnel level. The audacity of these jerks is simple amazing.

42 posted on 06/11/2006 8:05:51 PM PDT by armymarinemom (My sons freed Iraqi and Afghan Honor Roll students.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events
Just another feel good movie for the left.

A flash in the pan that will end up no better than many B grade movies of yore.

In fact many of todays Hollywood movies can not hold a candle to some of those old B movies from the 1930's and 40's.

I watch TCM and AMC more than I do HBO, Cinemax, Showtime or Starz put together.

With 30 or more movie channel choices I find it hard to really find a decent movie on most nights.

Hard Rain, Bourne Supremacy, Father of the Bride, Maria Full of Grace, The Hamburg Cell, Man On Fire and Open Range are some of the better ones I have seen lately.
45 posted on 06/11/2006 8:12:22 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events

Cusack was v good in the Grifters. He was in "Eight Men Out" Other than that who cares?


46 posted on 06/11/2006 8:15:54 PM PDT by dennisw (We should return to calling them Muhammadans -- Worshippers of Muhammad and maybe Allah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events
"I'm not worried about how it turns out in the first two months after it's released. A piece of art takes a while to be appreciated or not - if it is a piece of art. You try to make something that has some value and then in three, four or five years, it will still be interesting or it will have a pulse.

He should check the current sales and rental figures for Fahrenheit: 9-11 if he wants to sample the shelf life of agitprop films.

48 posted on 06/11/2006 8:19:12 PM PDT by Charles Martel (The Tree of Liberty thirsts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events
Cusack...embarrassing. Wants to be the neurotic everyman...but comes across as the forgettable everyman.
49 posted on 06/11/2006 8:20:59 PM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events

John who?????


50 posted on 06/11/2006 8:22:53 PM PDT by FlashBack (www.teamamericapac.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events

51 posted on 06/11/2006 8:23:22 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events

Immediately after 9/11, I worked at the mortuary where the bodies come in...and where Pentagon victims were. I wonder if this maroon would accept my invitation to go into a soundproof room and close the door and let me explain what a horrific war we're in.


53 posted on 06/11/2006 8:46:01 PM PDT by Gondring (If "Conservatives" now wants to "conserve" our Constitution away, then I must be a Preservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events

I liked him better when the paperboy was chasing after him for his two dollars.


55 posted on 06/11/2006 8:46:24 PM PDT by Kellykoop (All you need to start an asylum is an empty room and the right kind of people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events

Memo to John Cusack: People are not so dumb they don't understand the cost of war. We don't need to see caskets to understand what an awful, freadful decison it is to have to go to war.


56 posted on 06/11/2006 8:50:15 PM PDT by Homer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events
John Cusack plays the exact same character in every movie that he is in. He's the white Will Smith.
58 posted on 06/11/2006 9:01:51 PM PDT by Major Matt Mason (www.hockeysfuture.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events
John Cusack's motivation for his latest film grew out of something he did not see - flag-draped caskets returning from Iraq and Afghanistan.

Pentagon policy bans media coverage of America's war dead as their remains are returned.

5 years after the 9-11 attacks and I have still only ever seen 1 picture of a body from the attacks. 3,000 people died and no photos.

Odd that John Cussak should choose to highlight his hatred of the war in Iraq but not do anything to shout outrage at the Islamic war against the west.

Consider how many times the conspiracy link photos and internet movies have been posted about the 9-11 attacks (not so much to FR as to apolitical forums and email lists). And yet dead bodies from the 9-11 attacks don't "exist" in the minds of Americans.

59 posted on 06/11/2006 9:02:06 PM PDT by weegee ("Hitler dead in bunker by own hand, war rages on")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events

Too bad for you John. I enjoyed many of your slap stick movies, but I will no longer watch them.


What the heck is in the water in Hollywood? Why do Actors come out of the blue and start lecturing to the rest of us? Oh well his loss....


61 posted on 06/11/2006 9:04:57 PM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events
I think people are probably tired of being manipulated endlessly on the reasons and realities of this misadventure

Is he talking about the war here, or Hollywood's contant churning out of movies like this?
62 posted on 06/11/2006 9:04:58 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Now that Zarqawi is dead, who will the Democrats nominate in 2008?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events

If Cussack wanted to know about what happens once a US Serviceman's coffin comes home why didn't he just ask that Cindy lady who camped outside of Bush's Texas Ranch?


63 posted on 06/11/2006 9:07:05 PM PDT by Global2010 (Life takes allot of Prayer and Grit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events
The administration of U.S. President George Bush has strongly enforced the ban, something Cusack describes as "one of the most shameful, disgraceful, cowardly political acts that I've seen in my lifetime."

How sad that he can't see it...nobody's dead boy should be a media spectacle. Preventing such a sick circus is far from cowardly, it is simple decency.

It's also sad that Cusack thinks he matters.

64 posted on 06/11/2006 9:12:15 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Try Jesus--If you don't like Him, satan will always take you back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events
George Bush has strongly enforced the ban, something Cusack describes as "one of the most shameful, disgraceful, cowardly political acts that I've seen in my lifetime."

The ban is in place precisely so that jackals like this Cusack fool can't dishonor the bodies of American servicmen for political gain. These leftist fools, if given the chance, would be plastering pictures of the caskets on front pages everyday, probably listing them by name, without the slightest repsect or regard for the soldiers or their families.
66 posted on 06/11/2006 9:17:04 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events

I just wanted to put it somewhere, and this seemed like a good place. :-)

69 posted on 06/11/2006 9:22:13 PM PDT by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: World_Events
I remember a story about Cusack called "celebrity looting," about celebs who go into very tony stores in Beverly Hills and just... steal things. Quite boldly. And the store lets them get away with it because having a star wear your clothing becomes sort of free advertising. "Look, John Cusack's wearing so-and-so's leather jacket!" (He didn't pay for it, but...)

I used to think he was pretty cool, way back in the 1980s. I'll never forget that image of him holding the boombox up over his head with "In Your Eyes" playing. But after the "celebrity looting" story I started thinking, hm. Maybe he's just a jerk like all the others. Increasingly, nothing any of them does surprises me.

80 posted on 06/11/2006 9:41:44 PM PDT by wizardoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson