Posted on 06/11/2006 8:07:04 PM PDT by SamAdams76
Help from a librarian could have taught you "shudder to think", the correct phrase. We'll never know. :)
I'm just saying that you have to use correct spelling to get results from databases and search engines. I'm not the Nazi for that, technology is. You could have hit on the correct spelling by browsing through an old card catalog, now you can't.
Don't blame ME because you can't find things at the library. Or the library, for that matter. :)
I fat finger a key dropping an "l" and this gives you license to rag on me? Go find a better, healthier, hobby...
" I would not recommend Wikipedia as the be-all and end-all source of information. Good for organizational purposes, but the information can be very questionable at times."
Neither would I, but for what I was looking up (early post-conquest english monarchy info) it was just fine. I didn't see anything in what I read that was suspicious or flawed. i assume on more modern or contraversial events they are more suspect.
Maybe its Hillary's iud ?
Not even close. hint: when I was a kid, we needed them to play our favorite music.
The Jews were exterminated for less.
Back on topic though, public libraries currently pay no royalty to the original author or publishing house. How could extending this to the Internet, but with some recompense for the author as a small subscription fee, be a bad thing? Isn't something better than nothing?
Aside from typing skills, what am I missing here?
Spaceage guitar pick?
Libraries pay for hard copies of books and periodicals, just like individuals do. With a subscription service like Books 24x7, or electronic database subscriptions, fees are calculated by the vendors either enterprise-wide, or per seat.
However, there is no "per use" user fee involved. This business model would not only allow for a greater number of online resources access to these materials, but would also be a constant form of income for the publisher/author.
It'd seem a win/win from an economics standpoint.
This is just like the false hype that once was spoken about Excite.com
The world really did make more sense prior to 1919, didn't it? Or at least I think so the only way that I can: retrospectively.
"Americans Say Public Libraries Are Essential to 21st Century Communities"
http://www.publicagenda.org/press/press_release_detail.cfm?list=72
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.