Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blueflag
Does "big" mean he was FAT? Or does "big" mean he was 6'8" 265 lbs?

Fat people rarely are found climbing mountains, especially difficult climbs like Everest. This individual was probably tall and weighed in excess 200 lbs.

5 posted on 06/14/2006 6:10:21 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: BluH2o

If his arms and legs were frozen to the elbows and knees, it seems like they could have "made him smaller".


10 posted on 06/14/2006 6:19:10 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: BluH2o

I realize the logic of your reply is compelling. That would not stop, however, someone 'fat' making an illogical attempt on Everest.


11 posted on 06/14/2006 6:20:03 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: BluH2o

double amputees and blind people dont usually do it either, but its been done. why not fat?


123 posted on 06/15/2006 7:56:40 AM PDT by beebuster2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson