Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

After Sunglasses Gaffe, Bush Apologizes to Legally Blind Reporter
ABC News ^ | June 14, 2006 | JAKE TAPPER

Posted on 06/14/2006 7:37:48 PM PDT by DaveLoneRanger

June 14, 2006 — The president was in a jovial mood during his Rose Garden press conference Wednesday, joshing with reporters, excited to aggressively defend the Iraq war in the midterm elections, optimistic about his recent trip to Baghdad.

Then he was told a reporter he playfully teased about wearing sunglasses during the press conference has a serious vision problem and is legally blind.

By the end of the day, the exchange had merited a presidential apology. The reporter, Peter Wallsten of the Los Angeles Times, said he bears no grudges and accepted the president's apology quickly.

"Clearly the president has more important things to worry about," Wallsten said.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; dubya; gaffe; presscorps; wallsten
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-96 next last
"Too aggressively defend"?! Split that infinitive WIDE open, Mr. Professional Reporter Man!
1 posted on 06/14/2006 7:37:50 PM PDT by DaveLoneRanger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

HMM. Define "legally blind"


2 posted on 06/14/2006 7:39:35 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
"Clearly the president has more important things to worry about," Wallsten said

Working for the LAT, he may or may not be a barking moonbat but he has class.

3 posted on 06/14/2006 7:41:24 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
ABC is trying to stir up another pseudo controversy to piss on the president's good week
4 posted on 06/14/2006 7:41:36 PM PDT by slowhand520
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
HMM. Define "legally blind"

The MSM to the truth.

5 posted on 06/14/2006 7:42:39 PM PDT by Dr.Syn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

You said -- HMM. Define "legally blind"

Okay, here's a definition for you --

According to the entry on blindness in the Yahoo! Health Encyclopedia, anyone with vision worse than 20/200 that cannot be improved with corrective lenses is considered legally blind. In addition, people with a visual field of less than 20 degrees diameter (10 degrees radius) are also considered legally blind.

The American Optometric Association states that a person with 20/20 vision can clearly identify a row of 9mm letters from 20 feet. A legally blind person with vision of 20/200 has to be as close as 20 feet to identify objects that people with normal vision can spot from 200 feet. So a legally blind person needs a distance of two feet to spot the letters on a standard eye chart that is 20 feet away.

Regards,
Star Traveler


6 posted on 06/14/2006 7:43:08 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg; retMD

Legally blind is not the same as totally blind. The definition of legally blind is:

1) Best correctable vision, with "standard" eyeglasses, is 20/200 or less; or

2) a field restriction of 15 degrees or less. (Some sites say "20 degrees or less.")
31 posted on 06/14/2006 8:34:50 PM CDT by retMD


7 posted on 06/14/2006 7:43:12 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

President Bush showed class by apologizing to this guy, but seriously, who the hell could have known? I watched the presser and I though this guy was a Kos Kid with an attitude.


8 posted on 06/14/2006 7:43:42 PM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

The sunglasses looked disrespectful to most everyone. They were NOT dark sunglasses that blind people wear.


9 posted on 06/14/2006 7:45:49 PM PDT by RDTF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KJC1

I'll bet that ALL the reporters at the next presser have sunglasses on!!


10 posted on 06/14/2006 7:46:19 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kaboom"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

I see the term "legally blind" bandied about quite a bit. I wonder how many people are "illegally blind" and how big a problem that is.


11 posted on 06/14/2006 7:46:53 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (I think Randy Travis must be paying his bills on home computer by now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

Yeah abc, this is really worth reporting.../yawn


12 posted on 06/14/2006 7:47:24 PM PDT by VA40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KJC1
He doesn't seem to be having any problems here...
13 posted on 06/14/2006 7:48:02 PM PDT by oolatec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
Wallsten seems to have already addressed this. I guess Tapper is trying to keep it on life support.
14 posted on 06/14/2006 7:48:08 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Striving to obtain liberal victim status.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520

There's a lot of that going around. I heard someone refer to the dems news conference today as "another Pelosi pissin' match".


15 posted on 06/14/2006 7:49:22 PM PDT by Annie5622 (Democrats DO have a plan! They apparently plan to stay stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

How ironic...a "blind" reporter.


16 posted on 06/14/2006 7:49:25 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KJC1

I thought so to and DailyKooks was all over the President about this.

Just another one of those Ann Coulter encounters where another person cannot be talked about or to because they are also infallible. Reason being, hey he's legally blind. Though he was doing quite well with that pen and pad. Looked like he was reading his question.

Jeez. Ann was right.


17 posted on 06/14/2006 7:50:00 PM PDT by Chuck54 (Our great President & Commander in Chief, nothing more, nothing less, nothing else. 'Nuff said!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

Well, then we wouldn't be able to see David Gregory and Terry Moran making googley eyes at each other.


18 posted on 06/14/2006 7:50:27 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

Distraction of the day for 6-14-2006


19 posted on 06/14/2006 7:51:53 PM PDT by WhiteGuy ("Stop being good Republicans. Start being good Americans.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
Legally Blind Democrat--A person who is a muck diving member or a certified stinking floater in the Democrat septic tank of politics.

Legally Brain Dead--See Legally Blind Democrat.

Democrat--See Womb-Brain, Abortion, Sam Sex Marriage, Cut and Run, Coward, Muck Diver, Spineless, Godless, Hate America First,Floater, Liar, Tax and Spend, Kool Aid Drinker, Tin Foil Hat, Arrogant, Elitist..........
20 posted on 06/14/2006 7:51:57 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

Should the POTUS also apologize to those who are willingly blind about the War On Terror?


21 posted on 06/14/2006 7:52:09 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Now that Zarqawi is dead, who will the Democrats nominate in 2008?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
They were NOT dark sunglasses that blind people wear.

We might avoid drawing conclusions. Deaf, dumb, and blind may be degrees.

22 posted on 06/14/2006 7:52:32 PM PDT by ARealMothersSonForever (Political troglodyte with a partisan axe to grind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

He sure didn't act blind. Looked right at the President like he could see. No mention of him being blind by the L.A. Times that I could find. Hmmmm?


23 posted on 06/14/2006 7:53:02 PM PDT by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (Jesus always reads His knee-mail. (Hall of Fame Hit-N-Run poster))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARealMothersSonForever

whatever - not obvious


24 posted on 06/14/2006 7:53:25 PM PDT by RDTF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
The reporter, Peter Wallsten of the Los Angeles Times, said he bears no grudges and accepted the president's apology quickly.

"Clearly the president has more important things to worry about," Wallsten said.


The only possible explanation is: ROVE GOT TO HIM.
25 posted on 06/14/2006 7:53:26 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Now that Zarqawi is dead, who will the Democrats nominate in 2008?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Eeewwwwwww......


26 posted on 06/14/2006 7:53:54 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kaboom"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: oolatec

Eh, oops...

http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/pub_info/photos/Overton/askew8a.jpg


27 posted on 06/14/2006 7:54:35 PM PDT by oolatec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

This has to be one of the most ridiculous things I've ever read.

"Legally blind" folks do NOT ~need~ to wear sunglasses.

Sheesh.


28 posted on 06/14/2006 7:54:44 PM PDT by RMDupree (HHD: Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I wonder how many people are "illegally blind" and how big a problem that is.

The correct term is "undocumentedly blind".
29 posted on 06/14/2006 7:55:06 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Now that Zarqawi is dead, who will the Democrats nominate in 2008?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
There's only one person in the world who can wear sunglasses indoors without looking out of place . . .


30 posted on 06/14/2006 7:55:10 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority

Search google for "Peter Wallsten of the Los Angeles Times" and the first two pages are hit pieces this guy has written about Bush or his admin !


31 posted on 06/14/2006 7:57:20 PM PDT by america-rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
He said, 'I will. Though next time I'll use a different needle,'"

First of all, classy apology Mr. President.

Second...so how did the President answer his leftist question? When you start with the premise they were trying to discredit him, you are a leftist. Is it possible, Mr. Professional Reporter Man, that they were simply trying to GET THE TRUTH OUT?

Reporters like this irritate me.

32 posted on 06/14/2006 7:58:01 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

"I'll bet that ALL the reporters at the next presser have sunglasses on!!"

Or maybe the Pres?


33 posted on 06/14/2006 7:58:41 PM PDT by lawdude (Murtha: SPEAK LIES TO THE WEAK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

Did you see that reporter's car?

Neither did he...


34 posted on 06/14/2006 7:59:01 PM PDT by baltodog (R.I.P. Balto: 2001(?) - 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

It would be really funny if the President walked out wearing them. But they'd crucify him for that.


35 posted on 06/14/2006 7:59:12 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: demsux
How ironic...a "blind" reporter."

LOL....THAT is IRONIC!

36 posted on 06/14/2006 7:59:16 PM PDT by goodnesswins ( "the left can only take power through deception." (and it seems Hillary & Company are the masters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: lawdude

Great minds. Or idle minds. I'm not always clear on that point. ; ).


37 posted on 06/14/2006 8:00:55 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
I hated that damn song in the '80s. This story will just have satirical shows dredging it up.


38 posted on 06/14/2006 8:04:32 PM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

Much ado about nothing. How would anyone know the man had a vision problem just because he was wearing sunglasses. Now if he had a white cane AND wore sunglasses, I think President Bush would suspect something.


39 posted on 06/14/2006 8:12:53 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
Image Hosted by The Image Hosting Image Hosted by The Image Hosting
40 posted on 06/14/2006 8:13:41 PM PDT by ARealMothersSonForever (Political troglodyte with a partisan axe to grind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

MagooGate is upon us.


41 posted on 06/14/2006 8:17:38 PM PDT by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (Jesus always reads His knee-mail. (Hall of Fame Hit-N-Run poster))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
Here's the blind guy

St. Petersburg Times reporter Peter Wallsten interviews former Gov. Reubin Askew.

42 posted on 06/14/2006 8:18:46 PM PDT by Hoodat ( ETERNITY - Smoking, or Non-smoking?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

Has this reporter been around long? Is this a set up by the MSM to change the subject from the President? Smell test in action.....


43 posted on 06/14/2006 8:26:24 PM PDT by mojo114
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
My father-in-law is "legally blind" and the term is well-defined. However, it typically means that someone is "partially blind," and as such, sun glasses are a hindrance, rather than a help, to people who have partial vision. Usually, the partially blind person needs all the light source they can get to visualize whatever it is they are looking at.

This whole thing stinks to high heaven. I ain't buyin' it.

44 posted on 06/14/2006 8:26:41 PM PDT by PLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
Define "legally blind"

David Souter.

45 posted on 06/14/2006 8:29:29 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Maybe he's writing with a magic braille pen?


46 posted on 06/14/2006 8:30:04 PM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

Most if not all states have a firm definition, and there's probably a federal definition too (maybe all the same by now, due the mountain of intertwined federal and state disability rights and benefits). If he's wearing sunglasses, I think he probably has macular degeneration, which is a loss of central vision (i.e. you see a big black spot in the middle, but can see things in the periphery around it). For some reason, glare is a serious problem with this condition, and further impairs the already limited vision.


47 posted on 06/14/2006 8:30:08 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority

OMG, an adult exchange in DC??


48 posted on 06/14/2006 8:30:31 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
Also, blind people wear sunglasses to "hide" the fact that their eyes are not tracking, or sometimes their eyes are not "normal" looking. Therefore, the sunglasses shield the eyes from curious stares.

For the "legally blind" person, meaning one who has only partial vision, sunglasses would be a MAJOR obstacle to their visualization. This guy is a crock.

49 posted on 06/14/2006 8:31:00 PM PDT by PLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
Maybe they meant legally blonde? That would explain the confusion.....


50 posted on 06/14/2006 8:32:49 PM PDT by Skip Ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson