Posted on 06/15/2006 11:39:26 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Some aquatic birds can be a bit rank-tasting.
Went hunting with a Cajun once. He shot a bunch of coots (he called them, "pouldoo") and took them home for his wife to cook.
She cooked the breasts and legs for hours in a dark brown gravy with more onions than there was bird meat -- until the meat literally fell off the bones. She then picked off the meat, added it to the gravy and served it over rice.
The gravy and rice were quite good -- but the meat was still a little too strong-tasting for me...
My Cajun friend "seasoned" his gravy with lots of some clear stuff from a fruitjar; by the time the meal was over, he was enjoying everything... '-)
Nice piece, thanks.
I find the evolution of birds and the history of scientific opinion behind it, to be quite interesting.
Separating the layers of sediment from an ancient lake was like turning the pages of a book to get a glimpse of life in the time of dinosaurs, an international team of scientists said Thursday. "A world lost for more than 100 million years was being revealed to us," said Hai-lu You of the Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences.
What they found is being called the missing link on the evolution of birds, a loon-like creature that lived in northwest China and is the earliest example of modern birds that populate the planet today.
Before their discovery, reported in Friday's issue of the journal Science, the only evidence for this creature - Gansus yumenensis - was a single, partial leg discovered in the 1980s.
Now researchers have dozens of nearly complete fossils of Gansus, said a beaming Matt Lamanna of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh.
"Most of the ancestors of birds from the age of dinosaurs are members of groups that died out and left no modern descendants. But Gansus led to modern birds, so it's a link between primitive birds and those we see today," Lamanna said.
Previously there was a gap between ancient and modern species of birds, and "Gansus fits perfectly into this gap," added Jerald D. Harris of Dixie State College in Utah.
It was about the size of a modern pigeon, but similar to loons or diving ducks, the researchers said. One of the fossils even has skin preserved between the toes, showing that it had webbed feet.
"We were lucky far beyond our expectations" in finding these fossils, added You.
"Gansus is the oldest example of the nearly modern birds that branched off of the trunk of the family tree that began with the famous proto-bird Archaeopteryx," said Peter Dodson of the University of Pennsylvania.
The remains were dated to about 110 million years ago, making them the oldest for the group Ornithurae, which includes all modern birds and their closest extinct relatives. Previously, the oldest known fossils from this group were from about 99 million years ago.
The fact that Gansus was aquatic indicates that modern birds may have evolved from animals that originated in aquatic environments, the researchers said.
"Our new specimens are extremely well preserved, with some even including feathers," Lamanna said. "Because these fossils are in such good condition, they've enabled us to reconstruct the appearance and relationships of Gansus with a high degree of precision. They provide new and important insight into the evolutionary transformation of carnivorous dinosaurs into the birds we know today."
The remains were found in an ancient lake bed near the town of Changma.
"We went to Changma hoping that we'd discover one, maybe two, fragments of fossil birds," he said. "Instead, we found dozens, including some almost complete skeletons with soft tissues."
The new fossil material "is remarkable for its excellent preservation. ... The new fossils demonstrate that Gansus clearly is a bird that spent much of its life looking for food in water," commented Hans-Dieter Sues, associate director for research and collections at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History.
Gansus is an additional "link in a long chain of intermediate forms between Archaeopteryx, the oldest known bird from the late Jurassic, and modern birds," said Sues, who was not part of Lamanna's research team.
Funding for the research was provided by the Discovery Quest program for The Science Channel, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Dixie State College of Utah, the Chinese Geological Survey and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China.
At one point during the field work, Lamanna told his colleagues he would eat a duck foot if they found the fossil they were seeking while the television camera crew was still there.
So, did they?
"It tasted sort of like chicken, but real rubbery," he recalled.
Previously there was a gap between ancient and modern species of birds, and "Gansus fits perfectly into this gap," added Jerald D. Harris of Dixie State College in Utah.
A transitional? But I thought those didn't exist!
Drat! Another one to explain away.
...Then she's a witch!
A creationist thread on this topic, with an article from a creationist website, calls this thing a fossilized duck. So I guess that decides it. Creationists can still claim that there are no transitionals.
My first thought: But did it Get the WormTM?
Cheers!
AFLAC!
I don't know about wings and feathers, but you could start with the example of diplocaudus (tails on each end). ;-)
Cheers!
I don't know about wings and feathers, but you could start with the example of diplocaudus (tails on each end). ;-)
Cheers!
Evolution would suggest that animals could exist without skulls or heads. I guess creationists know that God designed animals with heads, but with all the varied evolutionary paths, you'd think that some animal would have a brain in his butt and not need a skull.
The real point being that it isn't just SKULLS that evolutionists simply assume, and therefore would be shocked not to find. I'm sorry I forgot my audience.
touche bump
LOL
If you don't understand that the theory of evolution would not suggest the existence of vertebrates without heads, perhaps you should go study the topic more before trying to talk about it.
If you're trying to make any sense you're failing miserably.
Tastes like chicken.
Thanks for posting the pic. FReegards,
all the descriptions of the fossils/bones seem to uphold a null hypothesis of: there is no significant difference between these and modern waterfowl bones.
This is a brainless post.
Nope, reading the actual journal article they place Gansus basal to Carinatae and Neornithes, the clade of all modern birds. I don't know enough about bird skeletal structure to determine the differences, but they must be notable for it to be so far removed. It seems the key differences eliminating these from Carinitae and modern birds are the bony structures of the limbs.
"The five specimens described by Dodson and his colleagues had many of the anatomical traits of modern birds, including feathers, bone structure and webbed feet, although every specimen lacked a skull"
"must be notable" was not expressed in the article posted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.