Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google Search Trends Show Danes, Australians, Canada Interested in Intelligent Design
Google Search ID Trend History ^ | 06/16/2006

Posted on 06/16/2006 10:49:26 AM PDT by SirLinksalot

Just out of curiosity, I did a little research about Google trends to see which countries other than the USA are interested in the issue of Intelligent Design vs. Evolution.

SEE THE RESULT HERE :

http://www.google.com/trends?q=Intelligent+Design&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all

Now, Click on the “regions” tab.

What is interesting is... it shows that our good ally in the War on Terror, Australia has about half the searches for Intelligent Design that we do.

But please note that Australia’s population is about 20 million. The USA on the other hand has about 280 million people.

This shows that Australia's INTEREST for ID is about 6 times more per person than the USA.

And note Denmark has only 5 million people. This means that the Danes are 20 times more interested in ID than Americans.

Interest on ID is more and more growing in Europe even in presence of a growing secularist tide.

The top 10 countries where ID is being searched for are :

USA AUSTRALIA DENMARK CANADA NETHERLANDS SWEDEN UK INDIA BELGIUM GERMANY

In the USA, the top 10 cities that are interested in ID are :

1. PHILADELPHIA

2. Washington, DC USA

3. St Louis, MO USA

4. Seattle, WA USA

5. Portland, OR USA

6. Denver, CO USA

7. Austin, TX USA

8. Minneapolis, MN USA

9. San Francisco, CA USA

10. Chicago, IL USA


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: angryevos; areyoudembski; crevolist; enoughalready; gogglebigbrother; google; id; idjunkscience; ignoranceisstrength; intelligentdesign; junkscience; pavlovian; plagiarism; topten; youngearthcultists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-332 next last
To: VadeRetro

Poor Pierre ... all those bridges ...


41 posted on 06/16/2006 5:30:20 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Of course, like all creationists, he is unable to ever admit to a mistake (even in arithmetic) and thus continues to burrow into mathematical inanity.

As one of the Panda's Thumbers noted, he HAS posted two longish posts since then and pushed the Google-gaffe far down the page. Maybe he's just going to ignore it away.

42 posted on 06/16/2006 5:55:31 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Maybe he's just going to ignore it away.

Yes, but what about the pathetic plagiarism of that blunder on this thread? Will that get ignored away too?

43 posted on 06/16/2006 6:03:36 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I'd settle for half-way smart, myself.


44 posted on 06/16/2006 6:05:45 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Absolutely, yes.
45 posted on 06/16/2006 6:08:48 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Never trust the Communist Google.


46 posted on 06/17/2006 7:19:24 AM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
One day later and this thread isn't on any one of at least three creo pinglists. They aren't spreading the good news!?
47 posted on 06/17/2006 7:47:48 AM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
One of the problems with plagiarism is that the only people tempted to do it are stupid people trying to appear to be intelligent; and stupid people are often too stupid to know that the stuff they're plagiarizing is stupid stuff.

Well, it's not a total loss. To his fellow fools, a plagiarist may indeed appear to be intelligent, because how is a fool to know the difference? However to the people a plagiarist is attempting to impress, plagiarism is a complete failure; because by committing the act of plagiarism, the plagiarist has added to his catalog of defects -- now he can be scorned for bad character, which is infinitely worse than mere stupidity.

48 posted on 06/17/2006 8:20:44 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
But you can always claim there's NO PROOF you didn't just happen to write the same words yourself.
49 posted on 06/17/2006 8:28:27 AM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
But ... think of the odds! Why, it's likelier that a tornado in a junkyard would produce a 747 than that two monkeys would both type the same nonsense. By this iron logic, which is so often seen around here, I'd have to go with the plagiarism theory.
50 posted on 06/17/2006 8:44:53 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
Plagiarism bump

51 posted on 06/17/2006 9:06:47 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Is the moral to plagiarize from better mathematicians? Perhaps from Minsk?


52 posted on 06/17/2006 9:24:15 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
But ... think of the odds! Why, it's likelier that a tornado in a junkyard would produce a 747 than that two monkeys would both type the same nonsense. By this iron logic, which is so often seen around here, I'd have to go with the plagiarism theory.

Please. It's only a theory!

53 posted on 06/17/2006 9:25:35 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Is the moral to plagiarize from better mathematicians? Perhaps from Minsk?

Always, please, remember to call it "research." (I got this from my friend in Pinsk).

54 posted on 06/17/2006 9:27:06 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs

J. Frank Dobie once mentioned that if one steals from a single source, it's plagiarism; if one steals from twelve, it's research.


55 posted on 06/17/2006 9:35:35 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs

Quietly Flows the Don to the Western Front.


56 posted on 06/17/2006 9:42:50 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs

A Russian itinerant, who needed to travel from Minsk to Pinsk, caught a ride with a wagon driver whose cart was drawn by a rather ancienthorse. As they approached the first significant hill on the Minsk-Pinsk highway, the driver halted the cart, unhitched the horse, and asked the passenger to assist him in pushing the wagon to the top ofthe hill. At the top, he hitched up the horse again, and they proceeded on their way until the nextsmall elevation, where they again repeated the previous procedure.After the fifth such ritual, the now-exhausted passenger dropped to his knees at the side of the road and looked quizzically at the driver. “I know why I have to get to Pinsk. I suspect you have a reason for going there as well. Enlighten me please. Why are we bringing the horse?”


57 posted on 06/17/2006 9:43:57 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Here's an interesting piece on the state of plagiarism in the US today from The Chronicle of Higher Education.
58 posted on 06/17/2006 9:44:09 AM PDT by starbase (Understanding Written Propaganda (click "starbase" to learn 22 manipulating tricks!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
The mathematician that others all quote,
Whos the professor that made me that way?
The greatest that ever got chalk on his coat.

One man deserves the credit,
One man deserves the blame,
And nicolai ivanovich lobachevsky is his name.
Hi!
Nicolai ivanovich lobach-

I am never forget the day I first meet the great lobachevsky.
In one word he told me secret of success in mathematics:
Plagiarize!

Plagiarize,
Let no one elses work evade your eyes,
Remember why the good lord made your eyes,
So dont shade your eyes,
But plagiarize, plagiarize, plagiarize -
Only be sure always to call it please research.

And ever since I meet this man
My life is not the same,
And nicolai ivanovich lobachevsky is his name.
Hi!
Nicolai ivanovich lobach-

I am never forget the day I am given first original paper
To write. it was on analytic and algebraic topology of
Locally euclidean parameterization of infinitely differentiable
Riemannian manifold.
Bozhe moi!
This I know from nothing.
But I think of great lobachevsky and get idea - ahah!

I have a friend in minsk,
Who has a friend in pinsk,
Whose friend in omsk
Has friend in tomsk
With friend in akmolinsk.
His friend in alexandrovsk
Has friend in petropavlovsk,
Whose friend somehow
Is solving now
The problem in dnepropetrovsk.

And when his work is done -
Ha ha! - begins the fun.
From dnepropetrovsk
To petropavlovsk,
By way of iliysk,
And novorossiysk,
To alexandrovsk to akmolinsk
To tomsk to omsk
To pinsk to minsk
To me the news will run,
Yes, to me the news will run!

And then I write
By morning, night,
And afternoon,
And pretty soon
My name in dnepropetrovsk is cursed,
When he finds out I publish first!

And who made me a big success
And brought me wealth and fame?
Nicolai ivanovich lobachevsky is his name.
Hi!
Nicolai ivanovich lobach -

I am never forget the day my first book is published.
Every chapter I stole from somewhere else.
Index I copy from old vladivostok telephone directory.
This book was sensational!
Pravda - well, pravda - pravda said: (russian double-talk)
It stinks.
But izvestia! izvestia said: (russian double-talk)
It stinks.
Metro-goldwyn-moskva buys movie rights for six million rubles,
Changing title to the eternal triangle,
With brigitte bardot playing part of hypotenuse.

And who deserves the credit?
And who deserves the blame?
Nicolai ivanovich lobachevsky is his name.
Hi!

- Tom Lehrer.

59 posted on 06/17/2006 9:49:51 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Why, it's likelier that a tornado in a junkyard would produce a 747 than that two monkeys would both type the same nonsense.

You have no proof, only evidence. I have the same evidence, but not your plagiarism-ist assumptions! Down with Plagiarism-ism!

60 posted on 06/17/2006 10:06:03 AM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-332 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson