Posted on 06/16/2006 2:27:25 PM PDT by Paul678
TV Watch Statement on Governments Role in Controlling Whats On TV:
President Bush signs broadcast indecency bill into law, but is that what Americans really want?
When the FCC slapped local broadcasters with a record $3.5 million in fines this March, it said it was reacting in part to an increase in public complaints about broadcast television. But a closer look at the pattern of complaints the FCC receives shows that the vast majority of individuals file complaints at the prompting of just two special interest groups, and complainants often admit they didnt watch the episode in question.
TV Watch Executive Director Jim Dyke released this statement today:
Those who cite massive complaints about whats on TV as a way of justifying increased government intervention should be extremely concerned. The governments own data show that the vast majority of complaints come from a handful of people encouraged by activists to complain about these shows, and not the viewers themselves. The disparity between the millions who tune in and the few complainants is further evidence that Americans do not believe the government should control what they watch on TV.
For example: How 4,211 e-mails led to a record $3.5 million in fines against local broadcasters[1]
More than 98 percent of the government-released emails about Without a Trace (CBS) were identical versions of the form complaints created by the Parents Television Council (PTC) and the American Family Association (AFA). Not a single one of the 4,211 government-released complaints against Without a Trace was submitted until nearly two weeks after the episode aired an episode watched by 8.2 million Americans. Only when the PTC and AFA issued e-alerts asking members to forward a prepared complaint, on January 12 and 17, did the FCC begin receiving complaints about the broadcast. Only in two out of the 4,211 email complaints did the author admit to having actually seen the program in question, and even those two complaints referred only to the brief, out-of-context segment provided by the PTC on its website. For example, a complaint filed against CBS affiliate KMOV admited that I did not actually see the show since I usually watch the History Channel or old movies on AMC or FMC or TCM, but I am outraged that our youth are exposed to this. I did watch a clip via the parentstv.org link and was disgusted.
Special interest groups manipulate the FCC complaint process
The American Family Association launched an online campaign against Las Vegas (NBC) and other shows in February and March 2006. As a result, the number of indecency complaints filed at the FCC during February and March 2006 jumped to nearly 140,000, from a typical average of less than 2,000 per month.[2] In February 2005, a PTC campaign launched against a single TV episode of CSI accounted for 89 percent of the total complaints the FCC received that month.[3] According to an FCC analysis obtained by Mediaweek, over 99 percent of indecency complaints filed before the FCC in 2003 came from the same interest group: the PTC. With the exception of complaints filed about the Superbowl wardrobe malfunction, the trend continued into 2004.
What is the PTC?
In recent years the Parents Television Council has asked the government to penalize broadcasters for such popular and Emmy Award®-winning shows as: The Simpsons, CSI, The Amazing Race, NYPD Blue, Futurama, American Idol, Survivor, Frasier, Dawsons Creek, Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me, Scrubs, Gilmore Girls, One Tree Hill, Will & Grace, Charmed, King of the Hill and others. In 2002 the PTC paid $3.5 million in fines when it settled a libel lawsuit filed by the World Wrestling Entertainment. As part of the settlement, the PTC apologized for misrepresenting the relationship between advertisers and the WWE, including the false claim that sponsors had stopped advertising because of the PTCs campaign. In 2006 the PTC was widely criticized for claiming that an innocuous episode of SpongeBob SquarePants contained what many parents call potty mouth or mild swearing and euphemisms for adult foul language. The episode in question, Sailor Mouth, was actually about the programs protagonists learning why they shouldnt use bad language and didnt include any swear words.
[1] Source: Motion to Vacate Notice of Apparent Liability and Supplement to Opposition of 93 Local Television Broadcast Stations Affiliated with the CBS Television Network (EB-05-IH-0035 before the Federal Communications Commission, 12 June 2006)
2 Source: FCC Quarterly Report on Informal Consumer Inquiries and Complaints, First Quarter 2006
3 On its website, the PTC claimed that its members sent 12,971 complaints to the FCC regarding that episode. In the same month, the FCC reported receiving 14,480 complaints overall.
You're #%*& right that's what we want!
I am glad that Congress passed this bill and Pres. Bush signed it. I am thankful for the P.T.C., I am thankful an organization like that exist and can keep on eye on what is on T.V. Jim Dyke needs to realize that millions of us do not complain but agree with the P.T.C..
I hope you can explain your comment in detail, with factual evidence to support it.
To me, once again, we have lost a little more of our freedoms as private citizens.
Can you quote the exact paragraph in the Federal Constitution that granted them authorization to pass this law?
What THIS American wants is control of the illegal alien situation.
By taking one small bite at a time they are forking us to death.
For me, it no longer matters what illegal laws that they pass. Unless it is enumerated in the Constitution, I will ignore it.
I was born a free American, and I will fight to my death to remain free.
Next month I will be on jury duty. I refuse to convict any American citizen of any "crime" that did not harm another human.
You want me to explain a flippant, tongue-in-cheek comment in detail with factual evidence?? Go buy a sense of humor.
Since your comment was satire, you are excused. LOL
So how many freedoms are you willing to forgo to get to that perfect utopia ?
As long as I can still watch South Park...
I sense another episode coming...
I have more to say, but I must run for now. Have a great weekend!
President Bush has already signed the Bill..
Congress has already debated the issues, and passed their versions, and reconciled both for presentation to the executive branch..
It's a little late to be whining about what is over and done with..
"Can you quote the exact paragraph in the Federal Constitution that granted them authorization to pass this law?"
I'll see if I can find it, but I suspect I'll find it close to the article and section giving authority to the government over public education.
OK, guys. Just don't come whining to me when a future liberal FCC starts determining what Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity can or cannot say.
Yet that's the precedent that has been set by the Congress and Dubya...all because a loud vocal minority gamed the system with e-mail complaints. Great example of democracy in action, isn't it?
TV Watch has the answers - at www.televisionwatch.org.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.