Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fishery Council Wants Monument Exception
Honolulu Star-Bulletin ^ | June 16, 2006 | Diana Leone

Posted on 06/16/2006 9:22:23 PM PDT by Proud2BAmerican

By Diana Leone

The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council will ask for continued commercial fishing in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, despite a presidential order yesterday that will ban it in a large region declared as a monument, a council member says.

Westpac council member Edwin Ebisui said the council thinks fishing is "palatable and consistent with a monument or reserve."

"Westpac's position is and has been that the two fisheries going on up there (bottom-fish and pelagic) have been for years absolutely consistent with marine protection," Ebisui, Hawaii member of the council, said yesterday by telephone from a meeting in American Samoa.

Even Bush's praise of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands as "pristine" is a testament to the lack of impact from fishing, Ebisui said.

The council's comments were the only discordant note about President Bush's proclamation of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands Marine National Monument yesterday.

National and local environmental groups, wildlife agencies and Hawaii public officials praised President Bush's action.

Bush's 11-page proclamation of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands Marine National Monument says "commercial fishing for bottomfish and associated pelagic species is prohibited in the monument after five years from the date of this proclamation."

At 140,000 square miles, the monument would eventually become the largest no-take marine conservation area in the world, just ahead of the Great Barrier Reef in Australia.

Bush's proclamation yesterday ends the need for release of draft and final environmental impact statements about the effects of creating a marine sanctuary -- and public comment on them.

Instead, it spells out the general terms of how the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service would share management responsibilities for the new monument.

The jurisdiction of the state, which controls most of the waters out to three miles from any land, will remain the same.

"This seamless partnership between the state and federal government, environmental conservationists and native Hawaiian organizations will preserve this special chain of atolls and reefs as a natural and cultural legacy," Gov. Linda Lingle said in a statement. She and other Hawaii officials attended the national monument announcement yesterday.

U.S. Rep. Ed Case, D-Hawaii, who described himself as overwhelmed and overjoyed by Bush's announcement, said, "His is a spectacular action which justly earns the distinction of the most significant single action in marine resource protection in our country's history."

Case had introduced a federal bill to create a refuge around the islands through an act of Congress that would have banned all but traditional subsistence fishing in the area. He said Bush's action does essentially the same thing.

Other members of Hawaii's congressional delegation also praised Bush's announcement.

"The designation of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands as a national monument is a bold step in protecting the vast resources and life of these islands and surrounding waters in perpetuity," said Jeff Mikulina, director of the Hawaii Sierra Club chapter. "By placing this area out of reach of fishing, commercial activities and human meddling, we are doing a tremendous favor to generations yet to come. Some places we just need to let be."

Westpac's Ebisui said he is still hopeful there will be additional room for public comment on that, including from his council.

The council recommends fishing policy for U.S. Pacific island states and territories to the U.S. Department of Commerce.

Bill Wakefield, one of nine fishing boat owners now permitted to fish in the Northwestern Islands, said yesterday he is already working on plans to get into Kona coffee production on the Big Island.

Wakefield's boat the Jaime Elizabeth just returned from a two-week trip that yielded 4,000 pounds of fish, and he is not sure yet if it will be its last.

"I've got a mixed reaction," Wakefield said of expected proposals to buy out his and others' investment in the fishery. "All us fishermen have a deep, deep love for that area," he said.

"The overall picture, conservation, I'm for," Wakefield said. "To me personally there's a bigger picture: to have a monument that's a secure, no-take area up there."

The president's proclamation sets a cap on the total amount of fish that can be removed each of the five years that current fishers are allowed to continue at 350,000 pounds of bottomfish (including uku, hapuupuu, ehu, onaga, opakapaka and kahala) and 180,000 pounds for pelagic (open ocean) species.

Without such a cap, Wakefield said, "It could be a mad rush to go up and catch as much fish as you can."

State records show that in 2004 the nine commercial fishing boats permitted in the Northwestern Islands caught about one-third of the total 495,000 pounds of bottomfish harvested in all Hawaii waters.

Peter Young, director of Hawaii's Department Land and Natural Resources, has said in the past that the cost of buying out the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands fishers would be relatively small in the context of preserving an international resource.

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: bush; environment; fishing; hawaii; hawaiian; islands; monument; nationalmonument; northwestern; notbreaking; nwhi

1 posted on 06/16/2006 9:22:25 PM PDT by Proud2BAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Proud2BAmerican
Without such a cap, Wakefield said, "It could be a mad rush to go up and catch as much fish as you can."

I doubt that very much. I worked around the tuna seiners in San Diego from 1977 to 1980. The optimal boat size ranged from 400 tons to 1200 tons. Attempts to run 2200 ton boats were a total disaster. The first fish caught would start to rot before the 2200 ton boat could be filled. Most of them has "unfortunate accidents" that left them on the bottom. The 1200 ton boat was optimal for a commercial operation. The 400 ton boats were usually family operations.

The 1200 ton boats generally managed 3 or 4 trips per year. The can't go after much more even if they wanted to do so.

2 posted on 06/16/2006 9:44:17 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BAmerican

I like this plan

3 posted on 06/16/2006 9:44:17 PM PDT by Porterville (Hispanic Republican American Bush Supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BAmerican

And now the shoe is on the other foot -

Where were the good Senators from HI when Utah had it biggest coal fields placed off-limits?

4 posted on 06/16/2006 9:51:25 PM PDT by ASOC (Choose between the lesser of two evils and in the end, you still have, well, evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson