Skip to comments.
Three US carrier strike groups steam in formation in Pacific Ocean (Awesome photo)
AP via Yahoo! ^
| 6/19/06
Posted on 06/19/2006 12:49:10 PM PDT by dead
The USS Abraham Lincoln, USS Kitty Hawk and USS Ronald Reagan carrier strike
groups steam in formation during a joint photo exercise (PHOTOEX) in preparation
for Valiant Shield 2006 on Sunday, June 18, 2006, in the Pacific Ocean. The
PHOTOEX featured 14 ships as well as 17 aircraft from Air Force, Navy, and
Marine Corp including a B2 bomber. The Kitty Hawk Carrier Strike Group is
currently participating in Valiant Shield 2006, the largest joint exercise in recent
history. Held in the Guam operating area beginning June 19-23, the exercise
involves 28 Naval vessels including three carrier strike groups, more than 300
aircraft and more than 20,000 service members from the Navy, Air Force, Marine
Corps, and Coast Guard. (AP Photo/U.S. Navy, Jarod Hodge) Email Photo Print Photo
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: guam; gwot; jointexercises; nationaldefense; northkorea; shipmovement; usaf; usn; ussabrahamlincoln; usskittyhawk; ussronaldreagan; valiantshield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-188 next last
Visitors in town, in case anybody's feeling ronry.
1
posted on
06/19/2006 12:49:12 PM PDT
by
dead
To: furquhart
Pinging self for later.
Anyone know if I can get a bigger copy? This would make an awesome desktop.
2
posted on
06/19/2006 12:50:36 PM PDT
by
furquhart
(Time for a New Crusade - Deus lo Volt!)
To: dead
The carriers are leading so they can protect the smaller craft from torpedos.
3
posted on
06/19/2006 12:51:20 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: dead
4
posted on
06/19/2006 12:51:28 PM PDT
by
Andy28
(Proud US Army DEP'er, shipping June 20th. Hooah!)
To: dead
Your tax dollars at work.
5
posted on
06/19/2006 12:52:01 PM PDT
by
glorgau
To: dead
I would just lose it (in a good way) if they Navy shot down that missile. That would just make my whole year.
6
posted on
06/19/2006 12:52:36 PM PDT
by
oldleft
To: dead
Idiots! Who's commanding these carrier groups?! I thought these carrier groups traveled with subs? Where are the subs?
7
posted on
06/19/2006 12:55:02 PM PDT
by
zarf
(John Edwards is a horses ass.)
To: AppyPappy
They are on minesweeper patrol lol
8
posted on
06/19/2006 12:55:14 PM PDT
by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: dead
Peace through Superior Firepower!
9
posted on
06/19/2006 12:56:14 PM PDT
by
Bean Counter
(Stout Hearts!!)
To: zarf
Idiots! Who's commanding these carrier groups?! I thought these carrier groups traveled with subs? Where are the subs?
Most likely submerged.
10
posted on
06/19/2006 12:56:20 PM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
(Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
To: dead
The naval version of the B-52 picture that has been posted many times -- "The terrorists have won the toss and have elected to receive."
11
posted on
06/19/2006 12:56:28 PM PDT
by
omega4412
(Multiculturalism kills. 9/11, Beslan, Madrid, London)
To: furquhart
If you right click on the photo above and select 'set as background', it should appear as your desktop background. Did for me.
To: AppyPappy
13
posted on
06/19/2006 12:57:15 PM PDT
by
Abathar
(Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
To: oldleft
....... if they Navy shot down that missile........
Wouldn't it be a shame if a missle took down their missle: And an errant missle just happened to land on top of their launch facilities!
"Oops! Sorry about that!"
14
posted on
06/19/2006 12:57:30 PM PDT
by
aShepard
To: dead
Hopefully they are headed for North Korea.
15
posted on
06/19/2006 12:57:50 PM PDT
by
Tokra
(I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
To: dead
Awesome pic, but maybe it isn't the safest thing for the Navy to have this many assets so close together?
16
posted on
06/19/2006 12:59:20 PM PDT
by
July 4th
(A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
To: July 4th
You mean as if something could attack that? LOL.
17
posted on
06/19/2006 1:00:46 PM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
(Dont be a Conservopussy! Defend Ann Coulter, you weenies!)
To: dead
When will they arrive off the coast of Iran?
18
posted on
06/19/2006 1:03:11 PM PDT
by
pfony1
To: glorgau
Your tax dollars at work. Would you prefer they be better spent on social liberal programs?
The military's budget should be $500 billion, IMO.
To: July 4th
That's exactly what I was thinking. NK is supposed to test fire a missile...what if they armed it and launched it at the battle group? Not much of a chance they'd do that, but...why give them such a fat, juicy target?
20
posted on
06/19/2006 1:03:31 PM PDT
by
Paco
To: dead
So which carrier launched the B-2 in the photo?
21
posted on
06/19/2006 1:04:55 PM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: dead
Heh-heh.
That's what I call sending a message. Let's pray the deranged Mr.(mentally)Il is coherent enough to take the hint.
22
posted on
06/19/2006 1:05:20 PM PDT
by
SueRae
To: dead
To: SueRae
I'd like to see our missile defense from Alaska shoot down the NK missile if they fire it.
To: zarf
25
posted on
06/19/2006 1:06:48 PM PDT
by
massgopguy
(massgopguy)
To: dead; Texas Termite; manna; Okies love Dubya 2; Fawnn; Harmless Teddy Bear; Kathy in Alaska; ...
AWESOME picture of our Navy...and a call for prayer for their safety.
26
posted on
06/19/2006 1:07:16 PM PDT
by
Brad’s Gramma
(Please pray for LadyX!!!)
To: furquhart
Here's a link to a
larger version of the above photo. I agree, awesome desktop.
27
posted on
06/19/2006 1:07:20 PM PDT
by
Grim
To: tsmith130
I tried that but got a pixelated version. I too need a bigger version if possible
To: Brad's Gramma
29
posted on
06/19/2006 1:08:09 PM PDT
by
E.G.C.
To: Waverunner
To: dead
Great photo! I wonder if this is being released as a Candygram to somebody?
31
posted on
06/19/2006 1:09:14 PM PDT
by
livius
To: livius
32
posted on
06/19/2006 1:09:42 PM PDT
by
Brad’s Gramma
(Please pray for LadyX!!!)
To: Paco
If NK arms and launches a missile at this battle group...I pity NK. The Navy knows what it's doing here.
To: Yo-Yo
"So which carrier launched the B-2 in the photo?" 
The unsinkable USS Andersen Field (Guam)
34
posted on
06/19/2006 1:10:08 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: zarf
Where are the subs?
The Silent Service does not photograph well - they are generally hiding in the water our of the surface fleet.
There ware two types of vessels in the military, submarines and targets.
Subs being the shy type, won't be found it these pictires.
35
posted on
06/19/2006 1:12:59 PM PDT
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: zarf
Where are the subs?
The Silent Service does not photograph well - they are generally hiding in the water out of view of the surface fleet.
There ware two types of vessels in the military, submarines and targets.
Subs being the shy type, won't be found it these pictires.
36
posted on
06/19/2006 1:13:26 PM PDT
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: dead
The terrorists in Iraq have shown how effective the RPG can be against our vehicles and men. There are lots of Chinese and Russian missiles that can waste our aircraft carriers in one or two blows. This photo shows good force projection and shows off our ships airplanes and technology but ....
And as far as anti ship missiles I haven't even included ones with nukes. A small nuke that decimates some of our ships out in a vast ocean, away from populations, will not be viewed with same world wide hysteria-agitation as a nuke deployed on land targets
37
posted on
06/19/2006 1:14:21 PM PDT
by
dennisw
(Fate of Nations)
To: Grim
Thanks for the link. That's an awesome photo. Enormous. Here's just a section of it at 100%:
38
posted on
06/19/2006 1:14:49 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: dead
North Korea please take note.
39
posted on
06/19/2006 1:16:32 PM PDT
by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc. 10:2)
To: dead
To: zarf
Where they are supposed to be, deep.
To: Waverunner
Thank you.....it makes a great background....
42
posted on
06/19/2006 1:21:56 PM PDT
by
Kimmers
To: dead
And who knows how many ships below.
43
posted on
06/19/2006 1:22:07 PM PDT
by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: furquhart
*sigh* What a beautiful sight. Official Navy photos may be downloaded at
Navy.mil. They, and other military photos, make great posters for FReeping.
To: Grim
Bumping for a new desktop when I get home from work!
THANK you!!!
45
posted on
06/19/2006 1:22:39 PM PDT
by
Brad’s Gramma
(Please pray for LadyX!!!)
To: July 4th
Awesome pic, but maybe it isn't the safest thing for the Navy to have this many assets so close together?My thoughts EXACTLY!!
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
To: dennisw
You read my mind. As impressive as all this weaponry is, I still have my doubts about these types of naval forces when the battle is between countries with advanced weaponry. In terms of force projection for conflicts in which we are unopposed...cool. BUT
I truly believe that a salvo of cruise missiles or longer range types will decimate a conventional naval force.
I see what the tenacious pilots of Argentina were able to do to the Brits in the Falklands and it should make us think before oohing and ahhing.
48
posted on
06/19/2006 1:26:30 PM PDT
by
zarf
(John Edwards is a horses ass.)
To: dead
49
posted on
06/19/2006 1:27:17 PM PDT
by
rightinthemiddle
(Islamic Terrorists, the Mainstream Media and the Democrat Party Have the Same Goals in Iraq.)
To: glorgau
Your tax dollars at work. I don't have a problem with that. In fact I'd rather that most of my taxes go to the military, instead of "social programs".
50
posted on
06/19/2006 1:28:16 PM PDT
by
SunTzuWu
(Hans Delbruck - Scientist and Saint.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-188 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson