Posted on 06/19/2006 8:20:11 PM PDT by LdSentinal
Edited on 06/20/2006 5:44:18 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
WASHINGTON (BNW) — If there were ever a reason for Blacks to leave the Democratic Party, the time is now, because House Democrats voted Thursday evening to suspend a Black member, Rep. William Jefferson from his seat on the powerful House Ways and Means Committee. Unshaken by both his own argument that the sanction was unfair and complaints from other Black lawmakers that he was the victim of a double standard, white Democrats kicked that [snip] in the ass.
We need to start our own party, “The Black Party,” and let the Democratic Party find some new suckers to mistreat. What have they done for US lately? They appear to care more about the plight of the illegal immigrants that the Blacks who vote for them every time with no payback.
The full House will have to approve the suspension before it can go into effect. Jefferson now plans to take his fight to the House floor, according to his spokeswoman, Melanie Roussell.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi pushed her colleagues to vote to suspend Jefferson -- mired in a federal bribery probe -- after he rebuffed her requests to step down voluntarily from the panel. She also rejected a last-minute offer from Jefferson to step down on the condition that he be replaced by another Louisiana lawmaker.
"It's very sad. But our House Democratic Caucus is determined to uphold a high ethical standard. We said it, and now we are doing it," Pelosi said after the vote. "This isn't about proof in a court of law. It's about an ethical standard ... what is acceptable public behavior for a public servant."
"Passing judgment on your peers is very, very difficult. But it's necessary."
But after the vote, the chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus, Rep. Mel Watt of North Carolina, said the suspension was based on "political expediency" rather than House rules, warning that it "could have consequences" for Democrats among black voters.
"We believe our constituents will import their own interpretation into this, and a number of them will import that there's a different standard in our caucus based on race," Watt said, though he added, "None of us are saying that. I'm not saying that."
Jefferson addressed his fellow Democrats near the beginning of Thursday's caucus meeting, which stretched more than three hours. He said he told them his removal from the committee would be unprecedented and unfair because the caucus' disciplinary rules do not provide for suspension of a member who has not been indicted.
"I simply asked the members of the caucus to put themselves my shoes, to imagine themselves standing where I was standing and to ask whether it would be deemed by them to be fair, " the New Orleans lawmaker told reporters.
"It is not right for the people I represent. ... It would deprive my folks of a chance to have their voices continue to be heard and their problems continue to be addressed."
But the chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, Rep. Jim Clyburn of South Carolina, said that under the rules, the Democrats' steering committee -- which recommended Jefferson's suspension last week -- has the authority to initiate changes in the membership of committees.
The motion to suspend Jefferson, taken by secret ballot behind closed doors, passed by a vote of 99 to 58. However, it failed to capture a majority among the 201 Democrats in the House because at least 44 of them did not vote.
The caucus decision was announced by Clyburn, who is also a member of the Congressional Black Caucus. He said lawmakers who did not vote were likely caught up in debate on the floor or in other committee meetings.
Clyburn described the tone of the debate as "very, very civil."
"There was no anger," he said. "Nobody relishes this."
After addressing his colleagues, Jefferson left while they debated. He later briefly returned to the room, shortly before the decision was announced, then brushed by the assembled reporters without comment.
The investigation
Jefferson is the subject of a criminal probe into allegations he accepted bribes in return for using his office to facilitate business ventures in Africa. In court documents, prosecutors said $90,000 in cash was found in the freezer of his Washington house when it was searched last summer
He has denied wrongdoing and has not been charged with any crime. However, a Kentucky businessman and a former Jefferson staffer have both pleaded guilty to corruption charges and agreed to cooperate with investigators.
The allegations against Jefferson present a wrinkle for House Democrats, who, as part of their mid-term election strategy, have been criticizing what they contend are ethical lapses by Republicans. Last month, just days after his Capitol Hill office was searched by the FBI, Pelosi asked Jefferson to step aside from Ways and Means, a powerful committee that oversees tax legislation.
Always a double standard?
Some CBC members charged Pelosi was applying a double standard in seeking the suspension of Jefferson, who is black, while allowing a white Democrat also under investigation, Rep. Alan Mollohan of West Virginia, to keep his seat on the equally powerful Appropriations Committee.
Mollohan, whose personal finances are being investigated after a complaint filed by a conservative group, did step down voluntarily from his assignment on the House Ethics Committee, pending resolution of the probe.
But Pelosi said Thursday evening that there was a "big difference" between the two cases, given the two guilty pleas in the Jefferson case and "very incriminating allegations."
"I told all of my colleagues, anybody with $90,000 in your freezer, you have a problem with this caucus," she said.
On Wednesday, Jefferson sent a letter to Pelosi offering to step down from the committee on two conditions -- that she require any other Democratic lawmaker under investigation by the Justice Department to do the same and that she replace him with Rep. Charles Melancon, who represents an adjacent Louisiana district, in order to protect the interests of his constituents.
According to Jefferson, Pelosi rejected the offer shortly before Thursday's caucus meeting.
Jefferson, 59, is serving his eighth term representing Louisiana's 2nd District, a majority black, solidly Democratic district that takes in much of the city of New Orleans, along with some suburban areas. When he was elected in 1990, Jefferson became the first black congressman from the Pelican State since Reconstruction.
The FBI's search of his office on May 20 set off a tempest between the Justice Department and angry House leaders from both parties, who contend it was an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches.
President Bush later ordered the materials to be held by the solicitor general's office for 45 days, giving the Justice Department and the House time to try to resolve the impasse.
DemRatocide ?
Never Happen, only wishful thinking.
yeah, probably true.
they've had DeaNocide for 3 years already.
Never a more truthful statement has been spoken - and ignored.
MLK would turn over in his grave at this.
Definitely.....as demonstrated by the way the author ends the first paragraph. I'd like to see what happened if that were in The Washington Times editorial section.
The last sentence of the first paragraph is just too sad for words.
That sounds great, but if you want to defend an ass clown like Jefferson, than stay away from the Republicans, they have enough problems with liberal insurgents.
See post 7
If you want to see lily-White liberal women physically knock down an honest-to-God Black male Democrat, simply ask said man to stand up at any inner-city public school PTA meeting to demand school choice vouchers.
Let me tell you, they *will* shut him up.
That he wants to get his kids out of a failing inner-city school and into a successful (often elite White) private school is anathema to them.
There's a black hottie sitting across the bar from me right now. I'm thinking about asking her to join the Republican party. It a starts in my hotel room in 20 minutes. >8^)>~
one thing is for sure.....Jeffersons single vote would not be worth 90k......his benefactor also provided compensation for others, possibly even likely using Jefferson as the go-between to others who would be inclined to hear Jefferson out......congressfolks that Jefferson would be at ease in approaching about the matter and/or offers......
Clearly an unacceptable offer for Democrat "leadership".
Semper Fi
About 14% of the total population, but a much higher percentage of the Democrat Party.
LOL! Yeah right, you posting on FR with a laptop on the bar. Uh-huh...
How true...thanks for pointing that out.
Therein lies the problem the country faces. Whether Black, White, Red, Green or whatever, the question should never be "what have THEY done for US," but should always be, "WHAT HAVE WE DONE FOR OURSELVES?" and "WHO IS READY TO HELP US ACCOMPLISH IT?"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.