Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Gets Large "No" Vote
www.votersdomain.com ^

Posted on 06/21/2006 12:11:37 PM PDT by bluerose1980

A new CNN poll found that 47% of respondents would "definitely not vote for" Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY)


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2008polls; bwahahaha; clinton; domain; election; electionpresident; hillary2008; jezebel; politics; shejustcantwin; vote
if not Hillary then why does she still have the highest positive rate?
1 posted on 06/21/2006 12:11:39 PM PDT by bluerose1980
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bluerose1980
if not Hillary then why does she still have the highest positive rate?

Because there are just so many Democrats that people just won't vote for?

2 posted on 06/21/2006 12:13:31 PM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluerose1980
Says a lot about the Dems!!!!!
3 posted on 06/21/2006 12:13:32 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluerose1980

Bubba never got 50% of the vote.


4 posted on 06/21/2006 12:13:59 PM PDT by Ron in Acreage (Liberal Democrats-Party before country, surrender before victory, generous with other peoples money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluerose1980
Hillary consistently polls 40% or greater negatives, people who would never vote for her under any circumstances.

To win she would need more than 80% of the remaining voters, an absolute impossiblity.

I am praying that the Democrats are arrogant and stupid enough to nominate her.

5 posted on 06/21/2006 12:15:07 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluerose1980

Inspite of the fact that this is CNN and involves Hiltery, it gives me hope that this country has had enough of the Clinton mob.


6 posted on 06/21/2006 12:15:49 PM PDT by notpoliticallycorewrecked (God Bless our Military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage

If there had been only 2 people running, Bubba would still be in Arkansas.


7 posted on 06/21/2006 12:16:40 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage

Yeah but that's a lot different that 47% saying they "would never vote for" him.

As I've said on two different threads today, there is not a national poll that shows Hillary standing a snowball's chance in hell of ever getting elected president. She even gets trounced by "an un-named Republican".


8 posted on 06/21/2006 12:17:26 PM PDT by L98Fiero (I'm worth a million in prizes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bluerose1980

If enough people vote "No" can we have her deported to Pakistan? (It would be neat to revive the old Athenian custom.)


9 posted on 06/21/2006 12:18:06 PM PDT by NaughtiusMaximus (Whats the matter with these Liberals? Didn't they learn anything in reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage

Because there were 3 main candidates who split the vote in 92' and 96'.


10 posted on 06/21/2006 12:18:35 PM PDT by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I am praying that the Democrats are arrogant and stupid enough to nominate her.

Not gonna happen unless she joins the cut and run crowd. She might but she's so invested now. The Republicans would just have to roll out the flip-flop ads again.

11 posted on 06/21/2006 12:18:58 PM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bluerose1980

43% or thereabouts voted for her husband. Since many in this number remain mentally and functionally challenged, she nets positives for them.
There must be gnashing of teeth in the clinton, carville and begala camp. Sure am glad about that.


12 posted on 06/21/2006 12:19:06 PM PDT by BamaAndy (Heart & Iron--the story of America through an ordinary family. ISBN: 1-4137-5397-3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluerose1980

Looks like the bitch isn't back.


13 posted on 06/21/2006 12:19:15 PM PDT by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moose2004

Don't let your guard down.


14 posted on 06/21/2006 12:27:03 PM PDT by freedomson (Tagline comment removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Fellow Freepers... don't be lulled to sleep by these numbers...

The poll asked the question to the "American Public"... not likely voters, not registered voters, it was not even limited to American citizens. 40% of the population of voting age did not vote in the last election, so a good portion of the folks who "Won't ever vote for Hillary", won't vote for ANYBODY.

My biggest concern about the 2008 election is that there will be an interesting Third Party candidate on the ballot, the GOP nominates a "Center-Right" candidate who doesn't meet 100% of the strict ideals of Conservatives, the Conservatives stay home or vote Third Party, and the day after election day in 2008, we'll all be sitting at home scratching our head and wonder "How in the hell did Hillary just get elected?"

The MSM put this poll out there so that the GOP will get complacent... and Hillary becomes "The Comeback Kid II".


15 posted on 06/21/2006 12:27:52 PM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bluerose1980
if not Hillary then why does she still have the highest positive rate?

Eliminate the people who won't vote for her under any curcumstances and then ask those who would who do you like the best.

If me and 3 guys are polled and 2 of us say we won't ever vote for Hillary, no matter what, eliminate us, out of the 2 who say they would, if given choices, and one like hill more and the other like warner or whatever, Hill now scores a 50%.

Make no mistake, Hillary has never been liked, The daily Kos is one of the biggest anti-hillary websites on the web, you'll find more freepers who think she is electable then you will find libs over there.

Weird, but true, more freepers think she could win the presidency then daily kos members do.

16 posted on 06/21/2006 12:28:14 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomson

Don't worry, I know the Clinton's are capable of anything when it comes to reaching for power. But at least for the time being, "the bitch isn't back!"


17 posted on 06/21/2006 12:29:08 PM PDT by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
My biggest concern about the 2008 election is that there will be an interesting Third Party candidate on the ballot, the GOP nominates a "Center-Right" candidate who doesn't meet 100% of the strict ideals of Conservatives, the Conservatives stay home or vote Third Party, and the day after election day in 2008, we'll all be sitting at home scratching our head and wonder "How in the hell did Hillary just get elected?"

You realize, that Hillary automatically draws a left wing 3rd party candidate by default.

The daily kos and DU crowd would explode without one.....and money draws candidates.

18 posted on 06/21/2006 12:30:35 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
My biggest concern about the 2008 election is that there will be an interesting Third Party candidate on the ballot, the GOP nominates a "Center-Right" candidate who doesn't meet 100% of the strict ideals of Conservatives, the Conservatives stay home or vote Third Party, and the day after election day in 2008, we'll all be sitting at home scratching our head and wonder "How in the hell did Hillary just get elected?"

Ross Perot pulled it off twice, and John McKeating will try, but it ain't gonna happen again.

Trust me.

19 posted on 06/21/2006 12:35:15 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bluerose1980

She missed her chance in '04. Could have swept in last-minute at the convention (very few weeks before the election) as the party's savior, used her popularity capital, and ridden the MSM-driven wave of unquestioned rabid enthusiasm into office.

Now both sides have had time (8 years) to think about her in detail. Will be interesting to see how she handles the reality of "too late", as her life goal was the Oval Office.


20 posted on 06/21/2006 12:36:05 PM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I do not fear her. I think she is unelectable. But there are a few dems I think can win. Like Bill Richardson of NM. But I think the moonbats will push for a hard lefty.


21 posted on 06/21/2006 12:39:03 PM PDT by Hydroshock ( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bluerose1980

If people remember, the media had a love fest with howard dean before the primaries. Howard dean could do no wrong in their eyes. But then he had his famous scream speech and they dropped him like a hot potato. I expect the same thing to happen to hillary, if the media thinks she is electable and can further their cause they will play it up. If they see tha writing on the wall that hillary is a polarizing perason and cant carry the ticket, she will be dropped as well.


22 posted on 06/21/2006 12:43:53 PM PDT by hoosierboy (I am not a gun nut, I am a firearm enthusiast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Although I do agree with you we cannpt let our guard down, registered and and to a greater degree likely voters would be even more skewed.

I would hazard a guess that 55% of likely voters would "definately not" vote for the Hildebeast.


23 posted on 06/21/2006 12:49:40 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bluerose1980

"if not Hillary then why does she still have the highest positive rate?"

Because democrats are stupid.


24 posted on 06/21/2006 12:51:47 PM PDT by Preachin' (Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
I believe Condi is electable. I'd vote for her in a hearbeat.

And she neutralizes the race, gender and orientation issues, all at the same time.

Demogoguery is the only tool the Democrats have, and they wouldn't be able to use it against her.

25 posted on 06/21/2006 12:53:08 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I would have to see where she stood on some domestic issues first before I could support her.


26 posted on 06/21/2006 12:54:45 PM PDT by Hydroshock ( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage

Yeah but Bubba had Perot. I'll bet hillary is looking everywhere for 'her' Perot.


27 posted on 06/21/2006 12:55:17 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bluerose1980

She has a high opinion rate among the Main Stream Media and they're trying their best to get America to see that.


28 posted on 06/21/2006 12:56:05 PM PDT by Ptaz (Take Personal Responsibility--it's not fun, but it's the right thing to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moose2004
I can think of at least one scenario which she could ride into the oval office, and she is capable of the orchestration and execution of such a plan, imo.

Don't ever count her out while she is still twitching.

There is a long dead list of people who have underestimated her.

29 posted on 06/21/2006 1:06:56 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

but i dn't think survey says Condo will have more positive votes either , since many are against her views with regard the Iraq war..what about her anyway?


30 posted on 06/21/2006 1:39:37 PM PDT by bluerose1980
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage
"Bubba never got 50% of the vote."

That's right. Clinton was elected in '92 with approx. 21% of eligible votes--the key word being eligible.

Talk is easy, and polls are worth very little unless it's clear who was polled and how the questions were phrased.

Otherwise they can be shaped to seem to say virtually whatever the pollster wants them to.

31 posted on 06/21/2006 1:45:47 PM PDT by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

that is what i have been doing..digging into and tracking down Hillary's record and actions..but i realize, on issues such as abortion and gay marriages..she changes stances from time to time..check the articles yourself..here is one good site i use to look into the performances of politicians..maybe this could help you before you go to the polls..goodluck!
http://www.votersdomain.com/articles/103


32 posted on 06/21/2006 1:52:03 PM PDT by bluerose1980
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bluerose1980

I know good and well she has only the stands on issues that she thinks can get her power. She like her husband are the ultimate snake, crooked, socialpaths. I just think that her shelf life is expiring. She will run, but I do not think she can win, to many negatives.


33 posted on 06/21/2006 1:58:45 PM PDT by Hydroshock ( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft
If there had been only 2 people running, Bubba would still be in Arkansas.

Bubba came in third here in Utah. I don't know what's wrong with the rest of you.

;-)

34 posted on 06/21/2006 2:14:38 PM PDT by Dementon (You're unique! Just like everyone else!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson