Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Silenced: Flight 800 and the Subversion of Justice, Part 1 [10th Anniv. Warm-up]
WND ^ | June 4, 2001 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 06/22/2006 8:43:39 AM PDT by canuck_conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,321-1,322 next last
To: highimpact

As far as explosives go and investigations of explosives, yes I am quite superior to you.


21 posted on 06/22/2006 9:36:56 AM PDT by U S Army EOD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

Really, why would there be missile "fuel"?


22 posted on 06/22/2006 9:38:21 AM PDT by U S Army EOD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RacerF150
The evidence points to an accident. The conjecture points to a cover-up. Isn't that the case with all popular conspiracy theories?

Wrong! The engineer in charge of TWA's 747 maintenance was so concerned about the cover up he was the one who allowed Sanders to take scrapings of the fuel residue. Furthermore, aeronautical engineers I have talked to STRONGLY disagree with the government's conclusion.
23 posted on 06/22/2006 9:39:14 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RacerF150

Yes it is very difficult to argue against people's immagination.


24 posted on 06/22/2006 9:40:02 AM PDT by U S Army EOD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
You're never going to convince the tin foil hatters that TWA800 was anything other than an accident.

They don't want to believe that there could exist some kind of conspiracy and nothing will ever convince them otherwise.

No matter how many facts can prove the missile theory it will never be enough.

25 posted on 06/22/2006 9:40:23 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

What fuel? Why didn't it burn up in the fire?


26 posted on 06/22/2006 9:41:19 AM PDT by U S Army EOD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD; All

Anybody figured out why the NG helicopter that was flying under the 747 never saw any evidense at all of a missile launch. If there was one, no way they could have missed it.


27 posted on 06/22/2006 9:43:52 AM PDT by U S Army EOD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BikerGold
Congress should re-open TWA800 and Oklahoma City bombing thorough re-investigation. Jamie Gorelick, Richard Clarke and other corrupt Clinton people should be put to justice.
28 posted on 06/22/2006 9:44:33 AM PDT by wannabegeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD
I likewise was an explosives expert in the army, and so please do not pull any superiority BS on me.

It was RESIDUE on the several rows of the seats was from solid fuel propellant of the type used in missiles. This was verified by two independent laboratories.
29 posted on 06/22/2006 9:45:27 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

I think I can with out any problem.


30 posted on 06/22/2006 9:46:17 AM PDT by U S Army EOD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD

One of the great things about Free Republic....whatever the subject, there are Freepers with expert knowledge.


31 posted on 06/22/2006 9:46:20 AM PDT by Churchillspirit (We are all foot soldiers in this War On Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD

Thats Hogwash! The truth is coming out and Jack and others are doing a great Service to Our Country in pursuing this.
No plane has ever climbed 3000 ft after loosing its entire nose.radar painted it falling after the explosions.


32 posted on 06/22/2006 9:48:08 AM PDT by True Republican Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Churchillspirit

I still have all ten fingers and both feet.


33 posted on 06/22/2006 9:48:23 AM PDT by U S Army EOD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD
What fuel? Why didn't it burn up in the fire?

You say you were an explosives expert in the army, and yet don't understand there is always residue left from burns?
34 posted on 06/22/2006 9:48:39 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
Wrong! The engineer in charge of TWA's 747 maintenance was so concerned about the cover up he was the one who allowed Sanders to take scrapings of the fuel residue. Furthermore, aeronautical engineers I have talked to STRONGLY disagree with the government's conclusion.

You can end debate with imaginary friends.

35 posted on 06/22/2006 9:49:45 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Ninguna tarjeta verde. Ningún Inglés. Ningún servicio.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD
From another thread on FR:

The two National Guard pilots in their nearby helicopter now picked up the streaks high in the sky. Said Capt. Chris Baur: "Almost due south, there was a hard white light, like burning pyrotechnics, in level flight. I was trying to figure out what it was. It was the wrong color for flares. It struck an object coming from the right and made it explode." Maj. Fritz Meyer, a winner of the Distinguished Flying Cross for his service over Vietnam, saw the southbound missile clearest. "It was definitely a rocket motor," says Meyer. Delgado saw TWA Flight 800 "glitter" in the sky and the ascending object move up toward it. He thought at first it was "going to slightly miss" the 747, but it appeared to make "a dramatic correction at the last second." Then Delgado saw a "white puff." "From my vantage point," says Goss, "there was a direct explosion that followed and then after that there was a second explosion that was off to the east a little farther that was much larger." Meyer saw a bright white light also. "What I saw explode was definitely ordnance," he said. "The initiating event was a high velocity explosion, not fuel. It was ordnance." "About two seconds later," claimed Meyer, "lower, I saw one or two yellow explosions, from that the fireball, third. The first two high velocity, the last low-velocity petrochemical explosion." "Then a moment later there was another explosion and the plane broke jaggedly in the sky," says Lisa Perry. "The nose is continuing to go forward; the left wing is gliding off in its own direction, drifting in an arc gracefully down; the right wing and passenger window are doing the same in their direction out to the right; and the tail with its fireball leaps up and then promptly into the water below. The sounds were a huge BOOM! – then another BOOM!"
36 posted on 06/22/2006 9:49:47 AM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: True Republican Patriot

It painted parts of it falling. The aircraft was already in a nose up attitude with a lot of power on. When the front section of the aircraft broke off, the remaining section would have been tail heavy, lighter and still had power on. No problem climbing an additional 3000 feet. Which brings up the question on how they knew it climbed 3000 feet. Radar immage would be a good guess.

Although it is not a good example, remember when the shuttle blew up? The boosters continued to climb and fly around.


37 posted on 06/22/2006 9:53:27 AM PDT by U S Army EOD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

Now anyone who originally held this conviction of a missle strike and government coverup was labeled as a "tin foil hat" type or worse (shudder) a wingnut. People right here on FR said as much.

Now it's a Clinton administration obstruction and obvious coverup to a terrorist attack? Yes. Yes it was.

It's a pity it's taken ten years to reach that conclusion; and also a pity its' taken pure partisanship to admit to this.


38 posted on 06/22/2006 9:53:35 AM PDT by Dazedcat ((Please God, make it stop))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RacerF150
You can end debate with imaginary friends.

I never claimed to know the engineer in charge of TWA's 747 maintaince. However, James Sanders and others did. The engineer was later arrested by the FBI for allowing Sanders to obtain the residue.
39 posted on 06/22/2006 9:54:17 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

I've taken a few samples myself in explosive incidents and accidents.


40 posted on 06/22/2006 9:55:00 AM PDT by U S Army EOD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,321-1,322 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson