[Grendel9]

This was discussed in great detail
last night on Hannity & Colmes.
Colmes and his lady guets pooh-poohing
the whole thing as pre-1991 stuff
which is no longer valid. Hannity
and his guest blistering the Liberals
for sniding Bush and Blair re the WMD
"false info" as entry into war.

The other main point is that only
one page of a much lengthier document
is being released to the public.
If I were making an eduated guess,
I'd say Karl Rove intends to "leak"
little tidbits like this periodically
just to infuriate and undermine the
Democrats as we approach November, 2006.

[technomage]

Colmes and his lady guets pooh-poohing the whole thing as pre-1991 stuff which is no longer valid.

Right. but during the Klinton years the libs were up in arms over the chemical weapons storage depot near Pueblo, Colorado (I think) and how dangerous and life threatening these weapons were, even though they were from the 1960's or earlier!!

[PureTrouble]

"the whole thing as pre-1991 stuff
which is no longer valid"

Have to ask the question why is any WMD not valid that is found in Iraq?

Iraq was supposed to report all WMD's and precursors. Iraq never reported that they had ever had Sarin. These shells had Sarin and Mustard. They lost the war in 1991, signed an unconditional surrender document.

Don't let the media get away with the argument that "These don't count because they were pre 1991. I say they are trying to move the goalpost again.

[AmishDude]

I guess you can just have WMDs hidden around the whole country if they're old enough. 'Cause, you know, that's not a problem.