Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2003 UN Report: Iraq Sulfur Mustard Gas Chemical Weapons Have High Quality After 12 years of Storage
March 2003 UN Iraq WMD Report ^ | June 22 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 06/22/2006 11:38:34 AM PDT by jveritas

Since the story broke yesterday about finding 500 Shells of Chemical Weapons in Iraq, shells that contain Sulfur Mustard Gas or Sarin Gas, the Left and their media were quick to dismiss this extremely important find by using the lame excuse that these Chemical weapons Shells were produced before 1991 and hence its not effective anymore because it has much lower quality”. However in March 2003 UN report about Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction there is the following on page 77 (Page 79 of the pdf file), paragraph 1 of the report http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/documents/6mar.pdf :

“ The Sulfur Mustard contained in artillery shells that had been stored for over 12 years, had been found by UNMOVIC to be still of high purity. It is possible that viable filled artillery shells and aerial bombs still remain in Iraq.

The above form the United Nations inspectors and the darling of the Left Hans Blix totally destroy the stupid lies that the Left and their media has been spewing since the breakings new of yesterday. First the UN clearly state in March 2003 that the Mustard gas shells they found are of HIGH QUALITY even it had been STORED FOR OVER 12 YEARS. Second the UN admit that there may still VIABLE i.e. EFFECTIVE Mustrad filled artillery shell hidden in Iraq, and yesterday we learned for a fact that there were indeed 500 Mustard gas artillery shells that were found in Iraq since the removal of Saddam. Also it is safe to conclude that the Mustard Gas shells found after the war are still in high quality and highly effective Chemical weapons.

Another very important fact to add is that Saddam had LIED to the UN inspectors and the world when he said that he had destroyed ALL his Chemical Weapons and other WMD. It does not matter whether these weapons were produced before or after 1991, his job was to destroy it ALL and not hide anything not a one ounce of these WMD, he DID NOT.


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: bttt; bushtoldthetruth; chemicalweapons; cnnignores; disarm; iraq; iraqiwmds; jveritas; lied; nuketheleft; onfreep; prewardocs; prewarintelligence; saddam; sarinmustard; scud; scuds; stockpiles; unesco; unscom; wm; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-211 next last
To: jveritas
jveritas, you get 2 gold stars for coming up with this one so fast!

Keep up this good work and we'll have to give you a 'ticker-tape' parade with all the bells and whistles.
41 posted on 06/22/2006 12:04:33 PM PDT by AmeriBrit (LIGHT A PRAYER CANDLE FOR THE TROOPS SAFE RETURN: http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/enter.cfm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

I think this would be important to be added to your files. Are we just using the keyword WMD and it will automatically get added?


42 posted on 06/22/2006 12:04:42 PM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Did she really say this?! This woman is so pathetic and she is wrong all the times as most liberals. Not a single time she made a right analysis or prediction because she always speaks of what she sees in her delusional world and not the reality.

How about Brit Hume, Fred Barnes, Mort Kondrake, what did they say about this? Thanks.

43 posted on 06/22/2006 12:05:34 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Relevant:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1653280/posts
Document: Saddam Ordered Biological And Radiation Test on Presidential Sites Attacked by US in 1998

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1653280/posts?page=69#69
Iraq's Scud Ballistic Missiles
Released July 25, 2000

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1653280/posts?page=67#67
Iraq's Chemical Weapon Program and UNSCOM's Task
44 posted on 06/22/2006 12:07:18 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

grrrr .. I need to proof read better

and that you !! = and THANK you !!


45 posted on 06/22/2006 12:09:56 PM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePb6H-j51xE&search=Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Ping


46 posted on 06/22/2006 12:10:08 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (The MSM is "the propaganda arm of our enemies." - Jack Kelly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thanks, I've been trying to convince someone on another thread not to fall for the confusing "degraded" wording. Degraded may mean they're likely to leak or likely not to fly with accurate trajectory, but they're still lethal toxic gasses.


47 posted on 06/22/2006 12:12:02 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (The MSM is "the propaganda arm of our enemies." - Jack Kelly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: jveritas

Gee, the MSM says it's much ado about nothing...


49 posted on 06/22/2006 12:13:09 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Great Work!!

Keep this one on top. Senator Santorum needs some help. MSM will cover this only when they absoluty must.


50 posted on 06/22/2006 12:13:40 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Great find!! Clearly such chem munitions CAN retain their potency for many years, contrary to what libs have rushed to say........So was the "anonymous Pentagon official" who was utilized so quickly to dismiss the significance of the 500+ chem munitions doing so on the basis of any real inside info, or was it just the typical Clintonista spin? I have to suspect it's the latter...... but surely someone must have been testing these munitions, so maybe the real info exists somewhere in the bureaucracy??


51 posted on 06/22/2006 12:14:40 PM PDT by Enchante (General Hayden: I've Never Taken a Domestic Flight That Landed in Waziristan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Great find!! Clearly such chem munitions CAN retain their potency for many years, contrary to what libs have rushed to say........So was the "anonymous Pentagon official" who was utilized so quickly to dismiss the significance of the 500+ chem munitions doing so on the basis of any real inside info, or was it just the typical Clintonista spin? I have to suspect it's the latter...... but surely someone must have been testing these munitions, so maybe the real info exists somewhere in the bureaucracy??


52 posted on 06/22/2006 12:14:48 PM PDT by Enchante (General Hayden: I've Never Taken a Domestic Flight That Landed in Waziristan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Are we just using the keyword WMD and it will automatically get added?

( Slaps head really hard to jar brain back into gear... )

I hadn't even thought of using the keyword index- "WMD" sounds good to me!

53 posted on 06/22/2006 12:15:39 PM PDT by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

For the record, I haven't said anything at all about the mustard gas weapons. My comments before were specifically about the sarin agent.

Otherwise, I don't want to discuss this topic any further, so please don't ping me to it again.


54 posted on 06/22/2006 12:16:15 PM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

LOL... :)


55 posted on 06/22/2006 12:17:59 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bubman
[Interesting how the left was crying over the dangers of WMD's to the environment on European soil when Reagan wanted to deploy the Minutement there during the eighties.]


No, no, no! The point is they were concerned about the ENVIRONMENT being harmed right here in the environmentalists own backyard by the presence of chemical weapons, and that's why they were condemned.

The stockpiles of chemical weapons in Iraq were only used to kill PEOPLE (dark skinned Iraqi people, at that) and only useless desert sand would be affected, not precious wetlands or rainforests.

It's all about priorities.
56 posted on 06/22/2006 12:18:13 PM PDT by spinestein (Goodbye, Dan Rather. (Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

LOL.

Until second before I typed that note to you, I hadn't thought of it either.

But I realize we're going to see lots of articles again about WMD and don't want to bother you for each one. I'll just make sure that WMD is under the keywords and we'll be all set.


57 posted on 06/22/2006 12:18:19 PM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Tigerhawk linked to this CIA rundown on what has been discovered (and disclosed) so far... what is your take on it? Looks like it reports the munitions as not that potent

http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/chap5_annxF.html Tigerhawk's blog entry: http://tigerhawk.blogspot.com/2006/06/these-are-not-wmds-youre-looking-for.html
58 posted on 06/22/2006 12:19:32 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

"Scott Ritter. Paging Scott Ritter."


59 posted on 06/22/2006 12:19:38 PM PDT by Danette ("If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

didnt reagan deploy pershing IIs not minutemen. the left howled, and where wrong.


60 posted on 06/22/2006 12:21:34 PM PDT by omega4179 (Dems lied, ppl died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-211 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson