Skip to comments.
Court's marijuana ruling a victory for authorities(zero tolerance in the real world)
http://www.mlive.com/news/ ^
| 6 22 06
| Steven Hepker
Posted on 06/22/2006 9:52:05 PM PDT by freepatriot32
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-194 next last
To: Beckwith
I am sorry I did not explain further.
Folks who had flood insurance were told their homes were damaged by wind: Therefore they were not covered.
Folks that had Hurricane insurance were told their homes were damaged by flood: Therefore they were not covered.
So the Con being played is in the middle of the hurricane at some point they were briefly covered just after their roofs blew off and just before the rains or flooding hit.. Or those who were first subject to the flooding had insurance for that brief moment between the time the floods came and the hurricane blew their roofs off.
How disgustingly Clintonesqe
"These people were told that there home wasn't damaged by the hurricane - it was "wind damage" - so they weren't covered! OR it was "water damage", not FLOOD ..."
Many say they were told by their insurance agent that they did not need flood ... Some with repairable houses (damaged by wind alone) have had to leave the ...
risingfromruin.msnbc.com/2005/11/bay_st_louis_mi_1.html
http://searchwarp.com/swa23988.htm Many of the homes destroyed by Hurricanes Rita and Katrina were ruined by deep water flooding which caused irreversible structural damage. Many people would assume that flooding caused by hurricanes would be something that insurance would cover, however many insurance companies have been rejecting these claims insisting that flood damage isnt covered in regular policies.
In addition, there have also been many emerging stories that are claiming that carriers have been lying and attempting to bribe their customers into signing waivers that would admit their homes were destroyed by flooding and not the hurricane. In other cases the insurance carriers were trying to claim the homes were destroyed by wind and not the water.
W
161
posted on
06/25/2006 11:56:17 AM PDT
by
WLR
("fugit impius nemine persequente iustus autem quasi leo confidens absque terrore erit")
To: WLR
162
posted on
06/25/2006 11:57:49 AM PDT
by
WLR
("fugit impius nemine persequente iustus autem quasi leo confidens absque terrore erit")
To: VRWCtaz
lack of understandingWhat's to understand? Dopers invent facts and whine when asked for a source.
163
posted on
06/25/2006 12:47:08 PM PDT
by
Mojave
To: tacticalogic
Soouds like Michigan has criminalized the posession and consumption of cellulose and chlorophyl. Don't listen to the voices in your head.
164
posted on
06/25/2006 12:48:11 PM PDT
by
Mojave
To: MortMan
Your bluff was called, you folded. Pretend all you want.
165
posted on
06/25/2006 12:51:30 PM PDT
by
Mojave
To: Mojave
Don't listen to the voices in your head.So far, they're smarter than you.
166
posted on
06/25/2006 12:53:46 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
The voices in your head are telling you that you're smart?
Trippy.
167
posted on
06/25/2006 12:55:13 PM PDT
by
Mojave
To: Mojave
Right now, they're telling me you're a bored little troll looking for someone to piss off.
168
posted on
06/25/2006 12:58:20 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
Chill, dude. Having your butt handed to you in debate isn't the end of the world.
169
posted on
06/25/2006 1:02:04 PM PDT
by
Mojave
To: Mojave
Not to worry. I'll let you know if it ever happens.
170
posted on
06/25/2006 1:03:47 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
171
posted on
06/25/2006 1:04:59 PM PDT
by
Mojave
To: Mojave
Not new, just not what you're used to.
172
posted on
06/25/2006 1:08:09 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: LowOiL
ROFLMBO... who says pot doesn't cause paranoia... this thread is proof it does...What are you talking about?
173
posted on
06/25/2006 1:37:08 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(Rivers will run dry and mountains will crumble, but two wrongs will never make a right.)
To: Kozak
"Can we start by shooting drunk drivers?"
Sure! As soon as we do, expect a substantial discussion of the efficacy of DUI laws, one that should have come years ago.
174
posted on
06/25/2006 3:06:43 PM PDT
by
LibertarianInExile
('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Billy Jeff, Pence, McQueeg & Bush related?)
To: Moonman62
"The irony of your screed is that Amsterdam, where marijuana law enforcement is so lax it's considered legal, is now majority Muslim."
Is 4.4% of the population a majority? Sounds like a tiny minority to me.
http://www.amsterdam.info/netherlands/population/
175
posted on
06/26/2006 9:41:19 AM PDT
by
TKDietz
To: TKDietz
That's the population figures for the entire Netherlands, and I believe the figure is closer to 10%.
In Amsterdam and Rotterdam the Muslim concentration is much higher. Sharia isn't too far off in the future. Ask the Dutch who are emigrating rather than staying to enjoy the legal dope.
176
posted on
06/26/2006 10:08:13 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: Moonman62
Okay Moonman, let's see some figures. Show us proof that the Muslim population in the Netherlands is really 10%. After doing some more searching I saw various figures on different websites, all lower than 6%. I didn't look long, but I couldn't find a percentage for Amsterdam in particular, but I doubt it's even 10%, let alone a majority. You claim that a majority of those living in Amsterdam are Muslims. Show some proof to back this claim up. That would be big news if it were really true, there'd have all sorts of stories on it published on the web from reliable sources.
177
posted on
06/26/2006 10:29:03 AM PDT
by
TKDietz
To: Moonman62
Since their information comes from readers who pots their content, Wikipedia isn't the most reliable source, but there they say that 11% of those in Amsterdam identify themselves as Muslim. That's a long way from being a majority of the population of that city.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amsterdam_(municipality)
178
posted on
06/26/2006 10:34:19 AM PDT
by
TKDietz
To: eleni121
Amway is captitalism at its finest. In fact, the only country where it was restricted was China. Most critics like this bozo Hassan are those who quit and couldn't do anything or want to sell a book... I prefer to learn from winners not losers. Are you involved with Amway? You use several catch phrases that the cult brainwashes with including "capitalism at its finest" and "losers".
179
posted on
06/26/2006 10:34:51 AM PDT
by
jmc813
(The best mathematical equation I have ever seen: 1 cross + 3 nails= 4 given.)
To: DesScorp
"Do you agree with Rudy's way of dealing with guns too?" No, but does that one mistaken impression invalidate his approach to crime overall?
Yes. Anyone too dense to realize the plain meaning of the 2nd Amendment is not someone who should be trusted with enforcing laws.
180
posted on
06/26/2006 10:38:09 AM PDT
by
jmc813
(The best mathematical equation I have ever seen: 1 cross + 3 nails= 4 given.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-194 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson