Skip to comments.
DoD News Briefing with Secretary Rumsfeld and Gen. Casey from the Pentagon (500 WMDs found in Iraq)
DoD News Briefing with Secretary Rumsfeld and Gen. Casey from the Pentagon ^
| June 22, 2006
| Donald Rumsfeld
Posted on 06/23/2006 2:51:53 AM PDT by FreedomPoster
Q Mr. Secretary, there's been a lot made on Capitol Hill about the chemical weapons that were found and may be quite old. But do you have a real concern of these weapons from Saddam's past perhaps having an impact on U.S. troops who are on the ground in Iraq right now?
SEC. RUMSFELD: Certainly. What's been announced is accurate, that there have been hundreds of canisters or weapons of various types found that either currently have sarin in them or had sarin in them. And sarin's dangerous. And it's dangerous to our forces and it's a concern. So, obviously, to the extent we can locate these and destroy them, it's important that we do so. They are dangerous. And anyone, I'm sure, General Casey or anyone else in that country, would be concerned if they got in the wrong hands. They are weapons of mass destruction. They're harmful to human beings. And they have been found. And they had not been reported by Saddam Hussein as he inaccurately alleged that he had reported all of his weapons. And they are still being found and discovered.
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; iraqiwmds; sarin; wmd; wmds
This excerpt is from about half-way into the transcript.
Posted since there are so many stories on the Santorum/500 WMDs news, that are quoting "anonymous Pentagon sources" as saying that these weapons weren't a danger. Well, Donald Rumsfeld disagrees, and he's hardly anonymous.
To: FreedomPoster
It would be unfortunate, but interesting nonetheless, if a journalist died because a sarin cannister exploded. Would the MSM suddenly admit Iraq had WMD's all along? Probably not. They'd blame the army/admin. for not disposing of the gas earlier.
2
posted on
06/23/2006 2:58:13 AM PDT
by
hershey
To: FreedomPoster
Another key statement is: "And they are still being found and discovered."
Stale or not, more are being found that may not be as old and stale.
3
posted on
06/23/2006 3:00:51 AM PDT
by
madconserv
(Jesus take the wheel- We Freepers can't do it all on our own.)
To: FreedomPoster
This story doesn't seem to be getting a whole lotta play. Just sayin'.
To: Darkwolf377
5
posted on
06/23/2006 3:04:01 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: madconserv
when liberals say that they are degraded WMD's, ask them if they would volunteer to drink some of it. :)
To: Echo Talon
I guess the libs don't want to clear out any old mine fields because they're now degraded.
To: Echo Talon
I've suggested to a couple that we explode one in their neighborhood to test it.
8
posted on
06/23/2006 3:11:29 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: FreedomPoster
... quoting "anonymous Pentagon sources" as saying that these weapons weren't a danger. Favorite fallback of the liberal drive by MSM ... "anonymous sources". As perky Katie Couric likes to put it "some people say" or "some are saying".
9
posted on
06/23/2006 3:12:35 AM PDT
by
BluH2o
To: FreedomPoster
Some how Rummy always finds a way to make it easy:
They are weapons of mass destruction.
They're harmful to human beings.
And they have been found.
10
posted on
06/23/2006 3:13:27 AM PDT
by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
To: FreedomPoster
Mr. Secretary, there's been a lot made on Capitol Hill about the chemical weapons that were found and may be quite old.
Almost sounds like this reporter was willing to be a guinea pig for testing 'quite old' poison gas.
11
posted on
06/23/2006 3:13:27 AM PDT
by
elli1
To: FreedomPoster

"They are weapons of mass destruction. They're harmful to human beings. And they have been found. And they had not been reported by Saddam Hussein as he inaccurately alleged that he had reported all of his weapons. And they are still being found and discovered."
'Nuff said.
12
posted on
06/23/2006 3:15:16 AM PDT
by
Jackknife
( "It's not a real party 'til somebody breaks something.")
To: Jackknife
FOMCLOL The Dimorats still will not "get it".
13
posted on
06/23/2006 3:22:44 AM PDT
by
madconserv
(Jesus take the wheel- We Freepers can't do it all on our own.)
To: elli1
Yo, Kerry, Murtha(traitor), wanna be a guinea pig?
14
posted on
06/23/2006 3:26:50 AM PDT
by
madconserv
(Jesus take the wheel- We Freepers can't do it all on our own.)
To: FreedomPoster
Rummy says it best at the end,
" And they are still being found and discovered."
I just wish Bush would let out the info. I do not care if it embarrasses China, Russia, Germany or France.
To: Jackknife
You said it Jackknife! Well said, Rummy!
16
posted on
06/23/2006 3:54:39 AM PDT
by
The G Man
(The Red States ... the world's only hope for survival.)
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: truth jihad warrior
Enjoy your short stay at FR.
18
posted on
06/23/2006 4:57:20 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: Admin Moderator
Agitpropagandist in the wire.
19
posted on
06/23/2006 5:01:37 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: FreedomPoster
Since the SOD talks officially for the department, I wonder if al AP, al Reuters and al AFP will stop using an unnamed official or officials in the government.
20
posted on
06/23/2006 5:02:41 AM PDT
by
hawkaw
To: truth jihad warrior
21
posted on
06/23/2006 5:02:45 AM PDT
by
tiredoflaundry
(The right wants victory, the left wants surrender. It's that simple.)
To: hawkaw
I'm not holding my breath.
22
posted on
06/23/2006 5:06:23 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: FreedomPoster
No neither am I. At least they reported it unlike the Old Grey Lady.
I am sure glad dbs like this site, FOX, AM radio hosts are around to get the message out.
23
posted on
06/23/2006 5:11:58 AM PDT
by
hawkaw
To: truth jihad warrior
OPSEC precludes me from responding to your questions.
24
posted on
06/23/2006 5:16:15 AM PDT
by
verity
(The MSM is comprised of useless eaters)
To: verity; truth jihad warrior
We should pop one in his neighborhood to test their condition.
25
posted on
06/23/2006 5:19:29 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: hershey
They'd blame the army/admin. for not disposing of the gas earlier Using typical DemocRat inconsistency, many of these same Leftist Congresscritters who are saying this stuff is "stale" and "no threat" were all in a twither back in the Clintoon Administration when we began disposing of "dangerous" chemical weaponry in our own arsenal left over from WWII, Korea and Viet Nam......
To: truth jihad warrior
It would certainly advance the story and provide a lot of credibility if the details were provided, for I have seen many posts indicating that even though they are dangerous in the sense that they could hurt someone, they are:
1. old and made before 1990,
2. not capable of being fired,
3. not ever used by any terrorists,
4. not used by Sadam.
All I can say is that the word must be spread that old ammunition and weapons are as capable of killing as any new weapons. I've been using my Dad's leftover shotgun shells to hunt ducks for years, and the ducks are still good eaten! Ask a duck if old ammo still works!
To: madconserv; FreedomPoster; hershey; Mo1; Straight Vermonter; Dog; Cap Huff; DevSix; ...
Another key statement is: "And they are still being found and discovered." Stale or not, more are being found that may not be as old and stale. Yup. On Hannity's show Wednesday Rick Santorum seemed to be itching to say more about the classified portions of the report (which he and Rep. Hoekstra are trying to get declassified). Sen. Santorum was skirting around the issue, but certainly implied that there are more WMD discoveries still unreported in the open press.
28
posted on
06/23/2006 6:13:34 AM PDT
by
Coop
(No, there are no @!%$&#*! polls on Irey vs. Murtha!)
To: Echo Talon
"when liberals say that they are degraded WMD's, ask them if they would volunteer to drink some of it. :)"
I have simply been asking them, "So there were NO WMD in Iraq and Bush lied. So now that there are WMD, did Bush still lie?"
And then the move the goalposts and say the WMD was not harmful.
Maroons
29
posted on
06/23/2006 6:19:13 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Democrats - The reason we need term limits)
To: Sprite518
Be patient. This is a Chinese water torture technique. drip, drip, drip. It builds until November.
To: ClaireSolt
I hope your right, but I have a feeling that its not going to play out that way. Did you read this transcript from Rush? See below;
Last night on Hannity & Colmes, Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney, who is a Fox News military analyst, said this: "[M]y personal opinion is, I think the fact is that the Russians moved large stocks of weapons of mass destruction out of Baghdad and Iraq in the fall of 2002. We've all heard what General Sada, the Iraqi defector said. He said that they went into three locations in Syria and one location in the Bekaa Valley, and if you get in there and if you found those weapons and found the precursors, the fingerprints would go back to Russia, China and France." This is McInerney last night on Fox.
Now... "Those are the three countries that had the most conventional weapon sales to Saddam Hussein. We've done an inventory on that, so that's public, and I believe they were complicit, so I don't think the administration wants to trash three of the five members of this Security Council." Let me translate. What McInerney is saying is what a number of people think. Those weapons were there and they were moved out by the Russians and by the French, by the Chinese, primarily the Russians providing most of the actual manpower and equipment to do it. They were moved to Syria, Bekaa Valley and three other locations.
China and France and Russia -- we all know this from the oil-for-food program, by the way -- were all engaged in selling large stockpiles of conventional weapons to Saddam and in some cases some people think maybe weapons that could be converted to the so-called biological or chemical weapons of mass destruction. But McInerney says I just don't think this administration is going to force the issue because he doesn't want to accuse three of our allies on the Security Council of being complicit here. So, folks, that's why it's going to require alternative voices to keep the pressure on, keep the heat on, and it can be done. Believe me, there are people livid about this, and the fact that it's being ignored and swept under the rug is only going to fuel the energy of those of us who want to spend time getting the information out."
To: EQAndyBuzz
"And then the move the goalposts and say the WMD was not harmful."
----
In a discussion with a lib yesterday, he had yet another way of moving the goalpost: "Chemical weapons aren't really weapons of mass destruction"...
LOL
I simply agreed with him that I didn't particularly like the way that had been defined either, and he was tongue tied.
32
posted on
06/23/2006 8:36:08 AM PDT
by
AFPhys
((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
To: FreedomPoster
If some enterprising Iraqi bottles the chemicals and sells them as aftershave to the libs, I doubt that the libs will slap it on each other and say,
Thanks, I needed that"
33
posted on
06/23/2006 11:06:20 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Insurgents love THE MURTHA PLAN: Make US troops hesitate, too long, before defending themselves.)
To: Sprite518
34
posted on
06/23/2006 11:24:43 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: EQAndyBuzz
And then they move the goalposts and say the WMD was not harmful. yea that looks like their strategy.. move the goalpost.
To: FreedomPoster
Love the graphic...thanks!
To: FreedomPoster
To: FreedomPoster
Last week John Batchelor interviewed a weapons inspector who stated a report designating a potential burial site for saddam's weapons had been sent to Saudia Arabia and inexplicably the report was deleted!!! According to the source, saddam buried the weapons and then flooded the site to make it appear as a swamp. I believe the area is near Najariyaf or Najaf. At any rate the UN weapons inspectors visited a cement plant but did not inspect a similar looking facility that turned out to have trace elements of nerve gas. If this story is true: WHAT IN THE HELL IS GOING ON!!!!!? The same person also said that included in the report two Russian generals facilitated in the removal of the weapons. Both received the highest Iraqi civilain awards. One general's expertise was in transportation and while the other's was logistics. Could somebody please acknowledge that this matter has been investigated. I'm getting damn sick and tired of all this secrecy and cover-up.
38
posted on
07/01/2006 11:01:58 AM PDT
by
branch1
(“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different resu)
To: FreedomPoster
Last week John Batchelor interviewed a weapons inspector who stated a report designating a potential burial site for saddam's weapons had been sent to Saudia Arabia and inexplicably the report was deleted!!! According to the source, saddam buried the weapons and then flooded the site to make it appear as a swamp. I believe the area is near Najariyaf or Najaf. At any rate the UN weapons inspectors visited a cement plant but did not inspect a similar looking facility that turned out to have trace elements of nerve gas. If this story is true: WHAT IN THE HELL IS GOING ON!!!!!? The same person also said that included in the report two Russian generals facilitated in the removal of the weapons. Both received the highest Iraqi civilain awards. One general's expertise was in transportation and while the other's was logistics. Could somebody please acknowledge that this matter has been investigated. I'm getting damn sick and tired of all this secrecy and cover-up.
39
posted on
07/01/2006 11:02:01 AM PDT
by
branch1
(“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different resu)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson