Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Israeli Rifle-Saturday Night Gun Porn
various ^ | 24 June 2006 | Various

Posted on 06/24/2006 8:36:25 PM PDT by Lurker

I'm watching Future Weapons on Discovery Channel and saw this new rifle the Israelis will be issuing soon. I thought it perfect for a Saturday Night Gun Porn Thread.

Here's a pic of one of the variants:

Here's the blurb from the source URL:

The Tavor TAR-21 is a gas operated, selective fire, magazine fed assault rifle of bullpup configuration. It is available in several configurations, which differ in the barrel lengths and accessories. The basic configuration is the TAR-21 assault rifle with the 460mm (18.1 in) barrel. Next are the compact assault rifle, called CTAR-21, with the barrel 380 mm (15 in) long, and the micro assault rifle, with the barrel of only 250 mm (10 in) long, called MTAR-21. The latter rifle also featured a redesigned front part of the housing, for a more comfortable hold of the short weapon. TAR-21 utilizes a now-common long piston stroke, rotating bolt action, with the gas piston rigidly attached to the bolt carrier. Gas cylinder is located above the barrel and is completely enclosed by the gun housing. The rotating bolt is similar to one found in the M16 rifle and has seven lugs. The ejection ports are made on both sides of the weapon, and the right or the left side ejection can be selected by installing the bolt with the ejector mounted on the right or on the left, respectively (and, of cause, this change requires the gun to be partially disassembled). The bolt carrier rides on the single guide rod, with the return spring unit located above it, behind and inside the hollow gas piston rod. The charging handle is located at the front left side of the gun and does not reciprocate when gun is fired. The charging handle slots are cut on the both sides of the gun housing, so it can be installed on either side of the weapon, as required. The trigger unit is more or less conventional, with the ambidextrous fire mode selector / safety switch located above the pistol grip.

The TAR-21 has no separate receiver. Instead, all parts are mounted within the high impact-resistant plastic housing, reinforced with steel inserts where appropriate. The access to all the internal parts is controlled by the hinged buttplate, which can be swung down for internal inspection and disassembly.

TAR-21 has no open sights. It is fitted with the standard Picatinny-type accessory rail on the top of the gun. At the present time the standard sighting equipment for the TAR-21 series rifles (except for the STAR-21 sniper rifle) is the Israeli-made ITL MARS, a complicated and expensive reflex-type sight with the built-in laser pointer. For the night time operations the MARS could be complemented with the ITL Mini N/SEAS compact night vision device.

Israel is replacing its world-famous Uzi sub-machinegun and U.S.-supplied M-16 assault rifle with a new flagship firearm.

The design of the Tavor is based largely on lessons learned during military operations in the West Bank and Gaza Strip during the 34-month-old Al Aqsa intifada. The first Tavors, made by Israel Military Industries (IMI), have been issued to elite Israeli infantry units, part of an order of 15,000 announced last month by the Defense Ministry.

Security sources said deals were under way to sell the weapon, retailing at $1,000, to "friendly foreign clients.". "The Tavor is probably the finest assault rifle now available. Its commando variation weighs 2.8 kg (6.2lbs) compared with the Uzi's 3.7 kg and M-16's 3.4 kg. Bullets are loaded through its stock, allowing for a snub barrel.

End Blurb.

It is chambered in 5.56mm NATO and is designed to use the SS109 type ammunition.

Retail price to 'friendly foreign clients' is said to be about $1,000.00 US.

L


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Israel; Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: banglist; gunporn; israelirifle; miltech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-110 next last
Thought we could use a Saturday Night Gun Porn Thread.

L

1 posted on 06/24/2006 8:36:27 PM PDT by Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bang_list
Four your consideration and discussion.

L

2 posted on 06/24/2006 8:36:54 PM PDT by Lurker (When decadence pervades the corridors of power, depravity walks the side streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
retailing at $1,000, to "friendly foreign clients."

They're joking, right?!

3 posted on 06/24/2006 8:37:40 PM PDT by Windsong (Jesus Saves, but Buddha makes incremental backups)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

I'd love one. Shame they are illegal.


4 posted on 06/24/2006 8:38:53 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Bullpup is the form factor of the future.


5 posted on 06/24/2006 8:42:32 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Windsong
I'm pretty friendly to Israel. I wonder if they'd cut me a price like that.

L

6 posted on 06/24/2006 8:44:16 PM PDT by Lurker (When decadence pervades the corridors of power, depravity walks the side streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
Image hosted by Photobucket.com GunPorn ping my Liege...
7 posted on 06/24/2006 8:44:23 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
That is one cool gun.

My son had an M4A1 carbine when he was in the IDF


8 posted on 06/24/2006 8:44:58 PM PDT by Alouette (Psalms of the Day: 135-139)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
Really? Are they on the BATF 'not approved for sporting purposes' list already?

L

9 posted on 06/24/2006 8:45:08 PM PDT by Lurker (When decadence pervades the corridors of power, depravity walks the side streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Gun Porn?


10 posted on 06/24/2006 8:45:31 PM PDT by umgud (Gov't needs a Department of Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Nah. Plastic - and I have seen the metal Uzis suffering parts breakage. Made it from high grade alloys, then it could be interesting.


11 posted on 06/24/2006 8:45:35 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Kind of ugly but I suspect it's good to work with. Like to see a review of someone who has used it.


12 posted on 06/24/2006 8:46:02 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
More Gun Porn?


13 posted on 06/24/2006 8:46:57 PM PDT by umgud (Gov't needs a Department of Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
The ejection ports are made on both sides of the weapon, and the right or the left side ejection can be selected by installing the bolt with the ejector mounted on the right or on the left, respectively (and, of cause, this change requires the gun to be partially disassembled).

At last, a bullpup for lefties.

14 posted on 06/24/2006 8:48:07 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Europe and the rest of the world can have the World Cup; the USA just settle for World Domination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
That rifle looks a lot like my Rock River AR, minus the pricey lasers. The ACOG is a very nice choice as well.

Mine sports an Aimpoint largely due to my inability to stash enough pennies for the ACOG.

Do you know if they're issuing this new rifle to the IDF yet?

The website says something like 15,000 have been ordered but no word if they're in general use.

Thanks and stay safe.

L

P.S. Can you tell the IDF I'm a very friendly foreigner and I'd like to get on their client list for one of these ASAP. Thanks.

15 posted on 06/24/2006 8:48:18 PM PDT by Lurker (When decadence pervades the corridors of power, depravity walks the side streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Reminds me a lot of the Steyr AUG or the British L85A1. I guess everyone's going bullpup.


16 posted on 06/24/2006 8:49:10 PM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Nice, I like gun porn.

http://www.horstheld.com/default.htm

This URL is some of the best antique gun porn.
17 posted on 06/24/2006 8:50:08 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

mmmmmmmmmmmm


18 posted on 06/24/2006 8:51:30 PM PDT by Syntyr (Food for the NSA Line Eater -> "terrorist" "bomb" "plot" "kill" "overthrow" "coup de tas")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud
My local dealer is 'taking orders' for the new FN. Prices start at about $1,500.00 I think.

Lurker Control has given me clearance to purchase the firearm of my dreams this year so I'm busting my hump to save up for one of these:

L

19 posted on 06/24/2006 8:52:14 PM PDT by Lurker (When decadence pervades the corridors of power, depravity walks the side streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: umgud
I had one of these.
20 posted on 06/24/2006 8:53:01 PM PDT by Boazo (From the mind of BOAZO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

---"It is chambered in 5.56mm NATO"


Why not just use spit balls???


21 posted on 06/24/2006 8:54:18 PM PDT by Mobile Vulgus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boazo

Kewl


22 posted on 06/24/2006 8:56:53 PM PDT by umgud (Gov't needs a Department of Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: edpc
On paper the bullpup design makes a lot of sense.

They kind of suck when you're standing at Parade Rest, though.

L

23 posted on 06/24/2006 8:57:05 PM PDT by Lurker (When decadence pervades the corridors of power, depravity walks the side streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Windsong; Lurker

Indian military & paramilitary units have signed up to buy the Tavor & Galil sniper rifles from IMI.


24 posted on 06/24/2006 8:58:03 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

That's a telephonic rifle. You can really reach out and touch someone with that. Hope you get it.


25 posted on 06/24/2006 8:58:30 PM PDT by umgud (Gov't needs a Department of Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
FNH FS2000... Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
26 posted on 06/24/2006 8:58:54 PM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Bullpup is the old project name for a British rifle project.

Modern assault rifles increase lethality with high velocity (which is helped by a long barrel, but a lot of combat occurs from vehicles, or in built up areas, where short rifle length is an advantage.

My rifle patent allows a 24 inch barrel in a 28 inch rifle, quick change barrel. That is with 7.62X51mm

Patent 6,079,138

The Tavor has pretty nice furniture, and has a nice crisp trigger, but I prefer a pistol grip for the front. No accounting for taste.


27 posted on 06/24/2006 8:59:09 PM PDT by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

You'd not want to get shot with the 223 at close range and this Israeli "rifle" is clearly meant for shooting things close up, as would be the case in gaza. It wouldn't be a useful hunting weapon.


28 posted on 06/24/2006 9:00:12 PM PDT by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Yes, yes, uhhh, hi, ahem, should have gone with the 6.8 round IMHO.


29 posted on 06/24/2006 9:01:35 PM PDT by Atchafalaya (When you're there, that's the best!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

What are the advantages/disadvantages of the bullpup compared to a standard assault rifle configuration? (Just curious; I've used an M-16 but have never handled any other rifle.) Where do you put the bayonet?


30 posted on 06/24/2006 9:02:57 PM PDT by Tancred (AS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windsong

I don't know how friendly you are but... Dude, want some gumbo, wash your car,...


31 posted on 06/24/2006 9:03:37 PM PDT by Atchafalaya (When you're there, that's the best!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
I'm waiting for this to become available:

Caliber: 5.56 mm NATO (KE) and 20x85mm (HE)
Action: Gas operated, rotating bolt (KE), unknown (HE)
Overall length: 890 mm
Barrel length: 250 mm (KE) 460 mm (HE)
Weight: ca 5.5 kg empty; ca 6.8 kg loaded
Magazine capacity: 20 or 30 rounds box (KE) and 6 rounds box (HE)

The history of the one of the most ambitious projects in the history of small arms, known as the OICW, or the Objective Individual Combat Weapon, began late in the 1986, when the US Army Infantry School at Ft. Benning published a military paper, named "Small Arms System 2000" (SAS-2000). Despite the current trends towards the caseless and fleschette ammunition and appropriate weapons, researched and developed under the ACR program (see HK G11 and Steyr ACR entries for some details), this paper stated that the conventional small arms already reached its technological peak, and the only way to increase the hit probability in the small arms is to introduce a weapon that will fire explosive and fragmentation warheads, combined with the smart fusing and sighting / aiming technologies. While the most small arms research during the late 1980s in the USA was conducted under the ACR program, the idea first developed in the SAS-2000 was supported by another US military paper, published in 1989 by the US Army TRADOC (Training & Doctrine) center. This paper, called "The Small Arms Master Plan" (SAMP), requested for a family of infantry "Objective" weapons, namely the Objective Individual Combat Weapon (OICW), Objective Personal Defense Weapon (OPDW), and the Objective Crew Served Weapon (OCSW). The SAMP stated that such weapons must utilize the latest developments in computers and visual technologies, as well as in the small arms, and combine both high explosive warheads and traditional bullets fire capabilities in a single weapon, that should be fielded circa 2000. Of cause, the timelines and most of the weight and cost requirements set in this paper looked unrealistic from the start, but the development of the Objective weapons began in the early 1990s.

During the early stages of research and development in the mid-1990 one out of the two teams was selected as a winner for further development contract. This team is lead by the US based Alliant Techsystems corporation (ATK), with the Heckler-Koch (Germany), Brashear and the Omega companies (both of USA) as the other team members. The ATK is responsible for system integration, and also develops the 20mm Air Burst munitions; HK is responsible for both the 5.56mm rifle and the 20mm grenade launcher; Brashear works on the sighting equipment and Omega provides the training means. The resulting weapon was type-classified by the US Army as the XM-29 circa 2002, and is scheduled to enter the service during the year 2008 in limited numbers. It will be then consequently upgraded with the new technologies then available. Present plans for fielding the M-29 are to issue four units per one infantry squad of 9 men. Early in the 2002 the XM-29 test weapons were successfully tested with the newest 20mm HEAB (High Explosive Air Bursting) munitions, which will be a major "kill factor" for the M-29 weapon. At the same time the "kinetic energy" part of the XM-29 was type-classified as the XM-8 light rifle, and, in the near future, could possibly replace the current Colt M4 carbines as a standalone compact conventional small arms.

32 posted on 06/24/2006 9:04:01 PM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Oh God that was a great looking weapon
33 posted on 06/24/2006 9:04:32 PM PDT by glaseatr (Proud Father of a Marine, Uncle of SGT Adam Estep A. 2/5 Cav. KIA Thurs April 29, 2004 Baghdad Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
Got a prototype for 'testing purposes'?

I promise to send it right back when I'm done.

Honest...really I will.

L

34 posted on 06/24/2006 9:04:58 PM PDT by Lurker (When decadence pervades the corridors of power, depravity walks the side streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Too bad the OICW was canceled.


35 posted on 06/24/2006 9:05:02 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Apparently Being Mean to a Troll is Now Against the Rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Then again, if you're interested in either mounting or cooking and eating whatever you're shooting at and want to ensure that it drops where it was shot whatever it might be, there's always America's most lethal firearm:


36 posted on 06/24/2006 9:05:23 PM PDT by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Atchafalaya
I would prefer a heavier round as well but one must admit the Israelis know how to build firearms.

L

37 posted on 06/24/2006 9:06:20 PM PDT by Lurker (When decadence pervades the corridors of power, depravity walks the side streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Lucky you, rub your head for me, please.


38 posted on 06/24/2006 9:07:04 PM PDT by Atchafalaya (When you're there, that's the best!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

That is too bad. I just saw it as part of a firearms history show on The History Channel.....must have been an old show.


39 posted on 06/24/2006 9:08:31 PM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Tancred
"Bullpuping" the weapon makes the overall length shorter but still allows for a full length barrel so there is no loss of velocity or accuracy.

It also makes it easier to handle in close quarters such as narrow alleys or inside an armored vehicle.

I'm not sure any provision has been made for a bayonet. I saw no mention of one on the website. Hopefully that will be corrected before they're issued generally.

Bayonets are a huge psychological weapon IMO.

L

40 posted on 06/24/2006 9:08:46 PM PDT by Lurker (When decadence pervades the corridors of power, depravity walks the side streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tancred
"What are the advantages/disadvantages of the bullpup compared to a standard assault rifle configuration? (Just curious; I've used an M-16 but have never handled any other rifle.)"

One advantage would be that you are getting the accuracy of a longer barrel in a smaller package.

41 posted on 06/24/2006 9:09:18 PM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: edpc

If we're talking about the same one, it's an old show that has been around for several years.


42 posted on 06/24/2006 9:09:35 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Apparently Being Mean to a Troll is Now Against the Rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Gun porn is my kind of porn.
43 posted on 06/24/2006 9:14:39 PM PDT by Boxen (You're thinking in Japanese. If you must think, do it in German!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
I was watching this on Future Waepons tonite too (actually it was a repeat episode) and my concern is the spacing between the mag placement and the cheek rest.

Is there enough spacing in there to use the 100 round C-Mag magazine? And how will a C-Mag affect the balance of the rifle?

44 posted on 06/24/2006 9:15:44 PM PDT by prophetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomzz
That's a real beauty. What is it?

L

45 posted on 06/24/2006 9:16:08 PM PDT by Lurker (When decadence pervades the corridors of power, depravity walks the side streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Still working on the prototype....

Downward ejection, between the two magazines. For California, the land of the 10 round magazine, well, ten round mags give you 21 rounds....

And can quick change barrels to switch to 5.56mm, or 12 gauge shot shells, less lethal rounds, or the Marine Corps developed 12 gauge grenade cartriges.


46 posted on 06/24/2006 9:17:26 PM PDT by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

From what I understand this is a weapon that the Israeli military doesn't want. It is very expensive to produce. They prefer to buy the M16, or its variant.



47 posted on 06/24/2006 9:18:14 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

I would love to have one of those.


48 posted on 06/24/2006 9:19:38 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Bayonets are a huge psychological weapon IMO.

Believe it or not....this SA80 has a bayonet...looks like it's side mounted.


49 posted on 06/24/2006 9:20:44 PM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
The website says they have an order for 15K of them and it further states that they're about $1,000.00 per copy. That's a bit pricey but not out of reach although I've never contacted say Rock Rivers sales dept and asked for a 10,000 lot price on the M4.

L

50 posted on 06/24/2006 9:20:44 PM PDT by Lurker (When decadence pervades the corridors of power, depravity walks the side streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson