Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Intelligent design" legislation in New York dies
National Center for Science Education ^ | 26 June 2006 | Staff

Posted on 06/27/2006 3:41:53 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 261-274 next last
To: wyattearp
Let's assume there is a designer. And let's assume the designer set the universe in motion in one Big Bang and then sat back to watch the result of that design very rarely nudging things in this or that direction.

Until we come to one wyattearp. Now the designer who preordained natures laws and elements has managed in one fell swoop to design a universe that actually works with all that entails.

But Wyatt thinks the designer is stupid because the giraffes neck is too short. The logical question is of course, what has Wyatt ever designed that approaches the complexity of even one element or microbe in the universe. Undoubtedly the answer is nothing, nada, zippo.

So, you'll understand if I take your criticism of the designer with amusement rather than taking it seriously.

141 posted on 06/28/2006 12:09:20 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: SaveUS
Trying to find flaws in Evolution is simply a foot in the science classroom door that Creationists have been looking for since Darwin published his work.

Trying to find flaws in scientific theories and hypotheses is called science.

142 posted on 06/28/2006 12:11:34 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

"So, you'll understand if I take your criticism of the designer with amusement rather than taking it seriously."

It was you who implied faulty design when you said,

"The notion that the giraffes neck and leg dimensions were naturally selected is one that is rather dubious if one has ever seen a giraffe drink water."

You can't have it both ways. You can't say that an example of excellent design is evidence for a designer and on the other hand an example of lousy design is also evidence for a designer.


143 posted on 06/28/2006 12:13:21 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman (Gas up your tanks!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
Let's get straight who can and can't do what.

You can't make crap up out of whole cloth.

Comprende'?

144 posted on 06/28/2006 12:17:08 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
"Let's get straight who can and can't do what.

You can't make crap up out of whole cloth.

Comprende'?"

I didn't, and I'll ask you to kindly refrain from accusing me of lying when I did no such thing. I posted what you said word for word.

"The notion that the giraffes neck and leg dimensions were naturally selected is one that is rather dubious if one has ever seen a giraffe drink water."

Is there something wrong with the giraffe's neck and legs that makes them ill designed for drinking water at watering holes?


If you can't stand by your words, don't post them. :) BTW, you don't get to tell me what I can or can't do. :)
145 posted on 06/28/2006 12:22:38 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman (Gas up your tanks!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

I was wondering why you said this, since I don't think it's neck is too short, but from later posts it appears you do, so the answer is obviously, "Because God made it wrong."


146 posted on 06/28/2006 12:28:17 PM PDT by ahayes ("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

it's = its


147 posted on 06/28/2006 12:28:33 PM PDT by ahayes ("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
"You can't say that an example of excellent design is evidence for a designer and on the other hand an example of lousy design is also evidence for a designer."

Now's your chance Mr Guitarman. You get to show where I stated that "an example of excellent design is evidence for a designer" and that "an example of lousy design is also evidence for a designer".

But you can't because you made it up out of whole cloth. Now if you consider that lying that's fine with me but I never used the word. :-} :-} :-}

148 posted on 06/28/2006 12:28:44 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: ahayes
LOL. You think that childish nonsense gets you some Darwin points?

It doesn't. A giraffe is a giraffe. Maybe God wanted a giraffe with a neck too short, maybe He didn't. Neither you nor I can ever know that. Now I can live with that but you can't. Being a methodological naturlist I assume, you should be able to offer some explanation for why the giraffes neck is too long, too short or just right. Choose your medicine and give it a shot.

149 posted on 06/28/2006 12:32:52 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
BTW, you don't get to tell me what I can or can't do.

I get to do whatever I please here at FR until I am asked to leave. And right now it pleases me to make you eat your words. Salt and pepper?

150 posted on 06/28/2006 12:34:42 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

You're a strange one. . . Why are you talking to me about giraffes? Why did you imply that a giraffe's neck is the wrong length and then deny it? Are you another pinata-whalloper, just whacking at whatever's in range?


151 posted on 06/28/2006 12:35:58 PM PDT by ahayes ("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

"Trying to find flaws in scientific theories and hypotheses is called science."

Exactly. However trying to punch those holes with a bible isn't anything that needs to be in the science classroom.


152 posted on 06/28/2006 12:38:58 PM PDT by SaveUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

I gather you're not interested in giraffes? Oh well, such is life. Do you have an opinion on why natural selection left the giraffes neck too short other than God forgot to cross the t?


153 posted on 06/28/2006 12:40:43 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Why do you think it's too short, and if it is, why are you letting God off the hook for screwing up like that?


154 posted on 06/28/2006 12:41:22 PM PDT by ahayes ("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: SaveUS

The Bible is not a science book, I grant you that. But making an enemies list out of those who "punch holes" in scientific theories does not advance the search for knowledge.


155 posted on 06/28/2006 12:42:27 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

What about those who make a lot of noise about ounching holes without having anything to back it up?


156 posted on 06/28/2006 12:44:29 PM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

"But making an enemies list out of those who "punch holes" in scientific theories"

Not sure if I know what you are talking about, but if it has anything to do with a religious source trying to do any "science", I would say YIKES and run away.


157 posted on 06/28/2006 12:44:39 PM PDT by SaveUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: SaveUS

Exactly. However trying to punch those holes with a bible isn't anything that needs to be in the science classroom.





Almost by definition science and its theories progress and changes as our understanding of the world deepens and folks step forward to challenge accepted truths. Conversely, belief is static. Religion does not take challenges to belief well.

Those who are fighting to have belief taught as science will very quickly find themselves outraged over what they feel are attacks on their belief systems.


158 posted on 06/28/2006 12:45:01 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
LOL, I take it you didn't like the previous answer. I don't know but more than that I don't really care.

It is not a question of dislike. It is an important factor to note. Whether or not the genome is intelligently designed calls into question whether or not the "design" of Monsanto can be detected.

That's because you are a one note Dimensio, stuck in a box of your own making.

I fail to see how understanding the specific defined scope of the theory of evolution has me "stuck in a box".

The relevance is simply this, if you live by falsifiability you die by falsifiability. Abiogenesis can not be science and as such, according to that icon of the Darwinian Judge Jones, it should never enter the realm of science. Yet it does!

This is a misstatement of science. Explanations presented as scientific theories must be falsifiable. If they are not, then they cannot be considered more than hypothesis. I am aware of no one who presents abiogenesis as a scientific theory.
159 posted on 06/28/2006 12:45:10 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

:-} You tried that already, it didn't work the first time, it's even worse the second time. If you know nothing about the adaptation of giraffes that's no big deal. Simply say "I don't know" and move on to another thread posting childish "God off the hook" nonsense.


160 posted on 06/28/2006 12:45:46 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 261-274 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson