Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cogitator; tertiary01

Your pictures are highly deceptive. They imply ice core resolution that is simply impossible in any sample other than a modern (uncompacted) one. The first one overlays measurements so you can't even see if there any ice measurements underneath (not that they matter). The second is pretty lacking, I'm sure you can find better. In the meantime, here's a better source, showing error bars on most of the samples. Note the absence of a hockey stick.


28 posted on 06/27/2006 10:56:24 AM PDT by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: cogitator; tertiary01
Oops. I suppose I should post my link: http://www.climate.unibe.ch/abstracts/indermuehle99nat.html


29 posted on 06/27/2006 10:59:07 AM PDT by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: palmer
They imply ice core resolution that is simply impossible in any sample other than a modern (uncompacted) one.

It's not a surprise that ice core CO2 data from older periods has decreased temporal resolution. But the concentrations of CO2 measured in the bubbles are accurate.

Where's your figure? Here's another one (with error bars; this might be the one you were planning to post):


31 posted on 06/27/2006 11:04:38 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson