Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court: Homeland Improperly Limited Workers
AP ^ | 6/27/6 | WILL LESTER

Posted on 06/27/2006 4:16:07 PM PDT by SmithL

WASHINGTON -- The Homeland Security Department can't implement proposed personnel rules because they improperly limit the ability of labor unions to bargain over working conditions, a federal appeals panel ruled Tuesday.

The system of regulations proposed early in 2005 by the federal agency "renders collective bargaining meaningless and is utterly unreasonable and thus impermissible," the unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said. Their strongly worded ruling upheld portions of federal District Court rulings last year and also expanded the protections of unions to bargain for worker rights.

The department's proposed rules gave agency management the power to override agreements reached in collective bargaining, removed many issues about work rules from bargaining discussions and created an internal board to hear labor disputes.

The ruling said the agency's ability to unilaterally cancel parts of labor agreements and the limiting of issues on the bargaining table "plainly violate the statutory command" in the law creating Homeland Security that the department ensure collective bargaining for its employees.

The Bush administration has argued that Homeland Security managers need flexibility if they are to improve national security after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Colleen Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union, called the decision "a sweeping legal victory for all Department of Homeland Security employees" but said the ruling has implications for all federal employees.

The Treasury employees union was one of five that joined together to legally fight the DHS rules.

"This decision is about every federal employee without exception," said Kelley, who suggested changes attempted at DHS could be tried at other federal agencies.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: govwatch; homelandinsecurity; judiciary; unions; unionthugs; wot
Well alrighty, then. As long as union jobs are protected, the rest of the Country doesn't need protection.
1 posted on 06/27/2006 4:16:11 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Amazing we can still function as a society with all these government and union tentacles.


2 posted on 06/27/2006 4:25:38 PM PDT by samadams2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

Can't do anything, anymore without the permission of a judge.


3 posted on 06/27/2006 4:29:04 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Even the dinosaurs manage to score a point every now and then.
4 posted on 06/27/2006 5:15:34 PM PDT by upchuck (Wikipedia.com - the most unbelievable web site in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson