Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stealth radar system sees through trees, walls -- undetected
Ohio State University ^ | 26 June 2006 | PhysOrg.com

Posted on 06/27/2006 8:10:29 PM PDT by Marius3188

Ohio State University engineers have invented a radar system that is virtually undetectable, because its signal resembles random noise. The radar could have applications in law enforcement, the military, and disaster rescue.

Eric K. Walton, senior research scientist in Ohio State's ElectroScience Laboratory, said that with further development the technology could even be used for medical imaging.

He explained why using random noise makes the radar system invisible.

"Almost all radio receivers in the world are designed to eliminate random noise, so that they can clearly receive the signal they're looking for," Walton said. "Radio receivers could search for this radar signal and they wouldn't find it. It also won't interfere with TV, radio, or other communication signals."

The radar scatters a very low-intensity signal across a wide range of frequencies, so a TV or radio tuned to any one frequency would interpret the radar signal as a very weak form of static.

"It doesn't interfere because it has a bandwidth that is thousands of times broader than the signals it might otherwise interfere with," Walton said.

Like traditional radar, the "noise" radar detects objects by bouncing a radio signal off them and detecting the rebound. The hardware isn't expensive, either; altogether, the components cost less than $100.

The difference is that the noise radar generates a signal that resembles random noise, and a computer calculates very small differences in the return signal. The calculations happen billions of times every second, and the pattern of the signal changes constantly. A receiver couldn't detect the signal unless it knew exactly what random pattern to look for.

The radar can be tuned to penetrate solid walls -- just like the waves that transmit radio and TV signals -- so the military could spot enemy soldiers inside a building without the radar signal being detected, Walton said. Traffic police could measure vehicle speed without setting off drivers' radar detectors. Autonomous vehicles could tell whether a bush conceals a more dangerous obstacle, like a tree stump or a gulley.

The radar is inherently able to distinguish between many types of targets because of its ultra-wide-band characteristics. "Unfortunately, there are thousands of everyday objects that look like humans on radar -- even chairs and filing cabinets," he said. So the shape of a radar image alone can't be used to identify a human. "What tends to give a human away is that he moves. He breathes, his heart beats, his body makes unintended motions."

These tiny motions could be used to locate disaster survivors who were pinned under rubble. Other radar systems can't do that, because they are too far-sighted -- they can't see people who are buried only a few yards away. Walton said that the noise radar is inherently able to see objects that are nearby.

"It can see things that are only a couple of inches away with as much clarity as it can see things on the surface of Mars," he added.

That means that with further development, the radar might image tumors, blood clots, and foreign objects in the body. It could even measure bone density. As with all forms of medical imaging, studies would first have to determine the radar's effect on the body.

The university is expected to license the patented radar system.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; govwatch; leo; miltech; privacy; radar; stealth

1 posted on 06/27/2006 8:10:32 PM PDT by Marius3188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

someone buy that guy a beer. :)


2 posted on 06/27/2006 8:13:33 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

3 posted on 06/27/2006 8:13:53 PM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

LOL! Old technology in the military. That's all I can say.


4 posted on 06/27/2006 8:14:10 PM PDT by MonroeDNA (Mohhamed drank urine from female pigs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

$100 and uses a computer? This seems like a fine geek toy. Imagine what you could do with an invisible stealth radar!


5 posted on 06/27/2006 8:15:17 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

Can they use it to see the telephone numbers NY Times writers dial?


6 posted on 06/27/2006 8:16:00 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

If you were to hunt snipes with this, it would be almost cheating.


7 posted on 06/27/2006 8:16:33 PM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

Very interesting post, thanks


8 posted on 06/27/2006 8:18:43 PM PDT by RDTF ("We love death. The US loves life. That is the big difference between us two.” Osama Bin laden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188
There goes the last of our privacy. The ACLU should act now to prevent this technology from being used. Now people will be able to look into you r home and watch what you do within the privacy of your own four walls

This is horrible!

I mean people would be be able to look right through the wall and see if Slick actually is hitting it!And the technology could be available even to the lowly Freeper!

Woe is me!

9 posted on 06/27/2006 8:19:58 PM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow
$100


10 posted on 06/27/2006 8:23:32 PM PDT by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

If the signal return can be digitized, imagine the killer sites on the Internet.

Like the rest of technology, it will first be perfected and made profitable by "adult" content providers.


11 posted on 06/27/2006 8:24:04 PM PDT by IslandJeff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

Something doesn't jive here. Does the Brooklyn bridge come with it?


12 posted on 06/27/2006 8:35:38 PM PDT by Leo Carpathian (ffffFReeeePeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

"watch what you do within the privacy of your own four walls"

Hooters' dressing room. "Dynachrome, building inspector at large!"


13 posted on 06/27/2006 8:37:56 PM PDT by dynachrome ("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA
"LOL! Old technology in the military. That's all I can say."

I was thinking something similar...this is new?

14 posted on 06/27/2006 8:39:17 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
Dynachrome city building inspector at the Playboy Club: "I hef cum to search yer beelding for weapons of mass instruction!"
15 posted on 06/27/2006 8:49:06 PM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA

And in some fields of science...lol.


16 posted on 06/27/2006 8:52:04 PM PDT by Gondring (If "Conservatives" now want to "conserve" our Constitution away, then I must be a Preservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

This may have tremendous military applications.


17 posted on 06/27/2006 8:53:24 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

This may have tremendous military applications.


18 posted on 06/27/2006 8:53:28 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

Actually the NYT is faxing over the specs to Al-Qaida right now so they can get a jump start on how to avoid being detected.


19 posted on 06/27/2006 8:59:04 PM PDT by uptoolate (Eph 6:24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

Seems to me that living inside and faraday cage is becoming a more and more atrative option if you want to keep privacy.


20 posted on 06/27/2006 9:05:09 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Europe and the rest of the world can have the World Cup; the USA just settle for World Domination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

ping


21 posted on 06/27/2006 10:56:23 PM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; b_sharp; neutrality; anguish; SeaLion; Fractal Trader; grjr21; bitt; KevinDavis; ...
FutureTechPing!
An emergent technologies list covering biomedical
research, fusion power, nanotech, AI robotics, and
other related fields. FReepmail to join or drop.

22 posted on 06/27/2006 11:20:45 PM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

Spread spectrum radio is nothing new. It was patented in 1942 by Hedy Lamar, believe it or not. So spread spectrum radar isn't new either.

http://www.satin.demon.co.uk/Spread%20Spectrum.htm


23 posted on 06/27/2006 11:24:31 PM PDT by Tarantulas ( Illegal immigration - the trojan horse that's treated like a sacred cow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

Walton said. Traffic police could measure vehicle speed without setting off drivers' radar detectors

Oh, the inhumanity! Ohio State has gone too far on this one! Stop this madness!


24 posted on 06/28/2006 3:47:20 AM PDT by Recon Dad (Marine Spec Ops Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
I was thinking something similar...this is new?

I thought that the principle of scattering signals across a wide spectrum and processing the returns with computers was the whole idea behind the F-22 radar, designed in the late 80s or early 90s.

Doing it for $100, now that is news.

25 posted on 06/28/2006 3:53:34 AM PDT by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tarantulas

That's Hedley!!
26 posted on 06/28/2006 4:00:33 AM PDT by LIConFem (It is by will alone I set my mind in motion...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188
Who needs radar when you've got these!?!?!?!

Mark

27 posted on 06/28/2006 4:02:16 AM PDT by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
That means that with further development, the radar might image tumors, blood clots, and foreign objects in the body. It could even measure bone density. As with all forms of medical imaging, studies would first have to determine the radar's effect on the body.

The university is expected to license the patented radar system.

Ping

28 posted on 06/28/2006 4:08:22 AM PDT by GOPJ (Team Bush: STOP begging the NYT with your hat in hand. Arrest them when they commit treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188
"It can see things that are only a couple of inches away with as much clarity as it can see things on the surface of Mars," he added.
So using this technology we'll need a powerful telescope to look at things only a couple of inches away. Wait. Maybe I didn't read that right. Where'd I put my glasses?
29 posted on 06/28/2006 4:48:34 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv; neverdem

excellent news...

blood clots!


30 posted on 06/28/2006 7:47:00 AM PDT by bitt (NY Times to New York: Drop Dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

"Seems to me that living inside and faraday cage is becoming a more and more atrative option if you want to keep privacy."

Yet another growth industry in construction. I can see the add copy now...

"... surround your new home with the new and improved Faraday shield. Built into our tyvek moisture barrier, the shield will protect you from errant RF, backscatter radar, and even superman!..."


31 posted on 06/28/2006 9:34:07 AM PDT by petro45acp (SUPPORT/BE YOUR LOCAL SHEEPDOG! ("On Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs" by Dave Grossman))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

This could be a step in the direction of a full-up diagnostic bed. No more poking and prodding, just lay down, and when the scanner has passed, the doc looks at the results. Be cool if it went right down to blood screening.


"...I'm a doctor, not a radar tech!"


32 posted on 06/28/2006 9:37:31 AM PDT by petro45acp (SUPPORT/BE YOUR LOCAL SHEEPDOG! ("On Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs" by Dave Grossman))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

Quick, someone sell it to China! /s


33 posted on 06/28/2006 9:40:07 AM PDT by csvset ("It was like the hand of G_d slapping down and smashing everything." ~ JDAM strikes Taliban)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA
LOL! Old technology in the military. That's all I can say.

You beat me to it. I really don't think we have seen the first example of a spread spectrum radar in a lab at Ohio State in 2006.

From Wikipedia:

The concept of frequency hopping, a type of spread spectrum, was invented in 1942 during World War II by actress Hedy Lamarr and composer George Antheil, who received patent number 2,292,387 for their "Secret Communications System". (She learned about the problem after being forced to attend defence meetings with her ex-husband while she was in Germany prior to WWII). This early version of frequency hopping used a piano-roll to change between 88 frequencies, and was intended to make radio-guided torpedoes harder for enemies to detect or to jam. The patent was little-known until recently because Lamarr applied for it under her married name of Hedy Kiesler Markey. Neither Lamarr nor Antheil made any money from the patent.

The Lamarr patent was a technological deadend and had no direct impact on subsequent technology as it was really ahead of its time. Military research at MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Magnavox Government & Industrial Electronics Corporation, and Sylvania Electronic Systems lead to early spread spectrum technology in the early 1950s. Parallel research on radar systems and a technologically similar concept called "phase coding" also had an impact on spread spectrum development.

34 posted on 06/28/2006 9:50:11 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

ROFL!


35 posted on 06/29/2006 12:23:38 AM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tarantulas
Actually, it sounds more like spectral (or frequency or Fourier) domain optical coherence tomography. (I'm not makin' this up!) In SD-OCT, one takes the Fourier transform of a light source's spectrum after it returns from the target. The transform converts the spectral domain information into displacement domain information. The result is a map of the features in the target that scattered the light back to the detector. The broader the source's original spectrum, the finer the resolution in the final image. In other words, nothing new.
36 posted on 06/29/2006 12:41:06 AM PDT by Redcloak (Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: StormEye

at 100 dollars...it priced just about right for field use...


also whatever happened to that application that used sound from a bullet to track where it came from..so it could locate a shooter...??


37 posted on 06/29/2006 12:51:50 AM PDT by Irishguy (How do ya LIKE THOSE APPLES!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson