Hey New York Times, YOU Shut the Hell Up!

FGS | 06/28/2006 | FGS

[ForGod'sSake]

~~pinging my list~~   ;^)

[wildcatf4f3]

saved

[ForGod'sSake]

Glad you liked it. Working on another as we type.

[grapeape]

Very good keep them coming. Lets see if we can't get some people to print these up and distribute them!!!!

[Allegra]

LOVE it.

I have never trusted the media, but my disdain for them has multiplied a hundred times in the last two and a half years.

[Allegra]

Very good keep them coming. Lets see if we can't get some people to print these up and distribute them!!!!

THIS one has just been printed and is about to go up on a bulletin board in Baghdad. A bulletin board in a very public coalition location.

[docman57]

NICE.....VEERRRYY NICE!

[ForGod'sSake]

Very good keep them coming.

Thanky kindly. The fourth estate's mouths may be writing checks their butts can't cash. God knows we are fighting a determined foe who until recently has never had to withstand a serious counter attack. The internet along with talk radio has created some ripples on their pond, eh?

[Irish Eyes]

Great picture. Keep them comming.

[ForGod'sSake]

I have never trusted the media, but my disdain for them has multiplied a hundred times in the last two and a half years.

Well, I was a little ahead of the curve. I've been trying to spread the word on our seditious faux press for the better part of ten years. Are you still "over there"? If so, I hope your buds like the pic.

[ForGod'sSake]

Thank you!

[ForGod'sSake]

Thank you.

[grapeape]

ROCK ON!!

[CaliGirlGodHelpMe]

At their website, my user name is ih8dnyt.

[grapeape]

Also remember that they get an unlimited supply of sex, drugs, free passes for anything they say or do, and money. They are a very dysfunctional group of people. I know them well...

They are a very determined enemy... What is really crazy about these people, when you learn who they really are inside, is that they do not really know why they believe what they believe...

It is so very strange.

[ForGod'sSake]

At their website, my user name is ih8dnyt.

You lost me.......I think. Are you a dues paying member of the NYT's message boards or something like that???

[ForGod'sSake]

They are a very dysfunctional group of people.

No doubt. How they've managed to create, then congregate in a field where irrational behavior is the norm is amazing. Inmates running the asylum comes to mind.

I know them well...

Sorry to hear that ;^)

They are a very determined enemy...

Wild eyed fanatics usually are. Radical Islam is just their cup o' tea.

What is really crazy about these people, when you learn who they really are inside, is that they do not really know why they believe what they believe...

I don't doubt that for a minute either. Teenagers in suits is a phrase I use for 'em. Seems to fit; belligerent, non-conformist, rebellious idealogues that never got past their sophomore year in high school. And they're giving us the "news".

FGS

[CaliGirlGodHelpMe]

"dues paying..."

No way! It's just that at their site, if you want to read complete articles you have to sign up and create an account and have a sign-on name.

[pookie18]

Thanks...will rerun in Today's Toons early next week.

[Pro-Bush]

Very cool. How about one for the LA Times and the "conservative" Wall Street Journal.

[ForGod'sSake]

No way! It's just that at their site, if you want to read complete articles you have to sign up and create an account and have a sign-on name.

I knew that....sortof. Seems there are still ways around that but I don't go there often enough to worry with it I suppose. I thought they were gonna start passing the hat around so those inclined to read complete articles(spit) could help out the old gray whore. God knows they need it!

[ForGod'sSake]

Enin, er, mornin' pookie. UDA man. Thanks.

[pookie18]

Mornin', FGS...nice work!

[ForGod'sSake]

Very cool. How about one for the LA Times and the "conservative" Wall Street Journal.

Yeah, they could probably use a little attention also, but, and I'm not one inclined in particular to defend the LaLa Times, they at least sat on the story until they found out the Neverland Times was sending it to the presses. So, didn't they all hit the racks on the same day??? Curious, if so.

[Pro-Bush]

If the other papers held back until NYT pulled the trigger - I totally agree with you.

[Allegra]

Are you still "over there"? If so, I hope your buds like the pic.

Oh, I'm still here and that pic went up on a bulletin board in the lobby of an administrative building in Baghdad about an hour ago. ;-)

[ForGod'sSake]

If the other papers held back until NYT pulled the trigger...

One can never be sure these days, but that's the way I heard it. Something else that I find curious is that if being first is so important to these rags, why did they in fact apparently publish simultaneously??? Makes one wonder if the Neverland Times wasn't looking for a little company to spread the treachery around. A lot tougher for Bush and company to go after the cabal, eh?

[ForGod'sSake]

Cool. You keep your head down over there girl!

[Pro-Bush]

Very curious indeed; it seems certain that there was collaboration between the three papers before this story hit the street. IMHO, NYT wanted the lefty publicity, and played the role - Salzburger hates bush and loves attention - he plays to his target market.

[Pajamajan]

Wasn't it the NY Times leak of our tracing Cell phone calls that caused us to lose a tracking ability on Osama Bin Laden? I seem recall something that goes back to Tora Bora?- where they were tracing some terrorists through the cell phone, and some media outlet leaked it so they ( terrorist's)stopped using cell phones.

Darn... Maybe it was Zarchawi? I can't remember exactly what it was about, but, it was clear that we lost some major lead/tracking ability because of a media leak.

I thought there would be outrage from president Bush and company but they let it slide by- doe-dee-doe- like it was no big deal. Anybody else recall something like this from a while back? It further illustrated how much damage has been done by these treasonous leaks.

It's about time they (Repubs) start dealing with this. They need to get tough with the media, and continue to call attention to the damage they are doing, and they need to find out who is doing the leaking and take them to trial for it.

(Personally, I like the idea of taking away the NY T's White House press credentials).

[no dems]

IT'S TIME FOR A NATIONAL BOYCOTT OF THE NYT AND ANY BUSINESS OR CORPORATION WHO HAS AN AD IN THEIR NEWSPAPER!!

Pardon the upper case keyboarding but that's how I rant when I'm extremely ticked.

[maica]

The Editor of the LATimes was interviewed on the Hugh Hewitt Show. The transcript with Hugh's comments is available. It appears that the NYT learned that the LATimes was on the same story, so both rushed their version into print. Obviously, the people inside government with top security clearances shopped the story to anyone who would listen.

Also, it becomes obvious that these "news" agencies have spies in each other's organizations.

[Fester Chugabrew]

Should we make one up for the uncharacteristically complicit WSJ?

[bitt]

ENEMEDIA ping

stole that excellent word from a freeper....

[doug from upland]

Mocking the TIMES unmercifully here --- http://cgi.ebay.com/Osama-thank-you-card-sent-to-treasonous-NEW-YORK-TIMES_W0QQitemZ220002307068QQihZ012QQcategoryZ367QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

[Velveeta]

Superb.

[ForGod'sSake]

I seem recall something that goes back to Tora Bora?

I seem to have a vague recollection of such goings on back then, but any details have long since escaped me.

(Personally, I like the idea of taking away the NY T's White House press credentials).

So do I, and not only the WH passes. Shut 'em out entirely! More of a symbolic gesture than anything else, but it would probably still give the empty suits at the NYT some heartburn. Couldn't hurt and might do some good.

My latest doodle:

FGS

[ForGod'sSake]

IT'S TIME FOR A NATIONAL BOYCOTT OF THE NYT AND ANY BUSINESS OR CORPORATION WHO HAS AN AD IN THEIR NEWSPAPER!!

You've got my vote which brings to mind another doodle:

FGS

[Grampa Dave]

Thanks to Phil Dragoo

[reagan_fanatic]

Very nice - too bad we can't put this on a billboard directly across from the Times building.

[ForGod'sSake]

Obviously, the people inside government with top security clearances shopped the story to anyone who would listen.

And there would likely be another one right behind 'em to take their place. Which means "W" and company have got to crack some skulls if they hope to have a prayer of keeping anything from our enemies and would be enemies. Jail time!

The upshot of this particular round of leaks is that it is essentially a non story. One has to wonder if the "Pinch and Bill" show is designed to protect other players in the money moving world. Who knows what other ties our domestic faux press may have here and around the globe they wouldn't want exposed?

Also, it becomes obvious that these "news" agencies have spies in each other's organizations.

Probably, and what are the chances the muckity mucks get together and compare notes regularly. They might even draw straws to see who gets to "break" a story. God luv 'em, I can live without 'em.

FGS

[ForGod'sSake]

Should we make one up for the uncharacteristically complicit WSJ?

The WSJ is a tough call. Question is, would they have gone to press with it if no one else did? I don't think so but based on nothing more than a hunch.

[shezza]

This new poster needs to find its way to Belly Girl.

[maica]

Ditto to everything you said!

[ForGod'sSake]

Har! Beary good Doug!

[ForGod'sSake]

Excellent!

[presently no screen name]

BTTT!

[ForGod'sSake]

Very nice - too bad we can't put this on a billboard directly across from the Times building.

Ooooohhhhh, now you've done it! Planting the seeds to rub Pinch's nose in it. Maybe some of our DC Freepers could make a new MOAB to send north???

[Grampa Dave]

Actually the WSJ is not a tough call.

The newspaper side of the WSJ was rated more liberal than the NY Slimes last year by a UCLA study.

The editorial side is started to turn liberal with their immigration stances and some other left bs.

Miss Marple and I cancelled our subscriptions to the WSJ for the rants of Al Hunt and his outrageous poll years ago.

Later we found out that Al Hunt was the key hirer of so called journalists for the WSJ for years. It is a safe bet that no one recommended by him would be conservative or fair balanced.