Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Surgeon General’s Report Focuses on the Effects of Secondhand Smoke
Surgeon GeneraL ^ | June 27, 2006 | HHS Press Office

Posted on 06/27/2006 11:34:51 PM PDT by at bay

U.S. Surgeon General Richard H. Carmona today issued a comprehensive scientific report which concludes that there is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke. Nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke at home or work increase their risk of developing heart disease by 25 to 30 percent and lung cancer by 20 to 30 percent. The finding is of major public health concern due to the fact that nearly half of all nonsmoking Americans are still regularly exposed to secondhand smoke.

The report, The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke, finds that even brief secondhand smoke exposure can cause immediate harm. The report says the only way to protect nonsmokers from the dangerous chemicals in secondhand smoke is to eliminate smoking indoors.

“The report is a crucial warning sign to nonsmokers and smokers alike,” HHS Secretary Michael Leavitt said. "Smoking can sicken and kill, and even people who do not smoke can be harmed by smoke from those who do.”

Secondhand smoke exposure can cause heart disease and lung cancer in nonsmoking adults and is a known cause of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), respiratory problems, ear infections, and asthma attacks in infants and children, the report finds.

“The health effects of secondhand smoke exposure are more pervasive than we previously thought,” said Surgeon General Carmona, vice admiral of the U.S. Public Health Service. “The scientific evidence is now indisputable: secondhand smoke is not a mere annoyance. It is a serious health hazard that can lead to disease and premature death in children and nonsmoking adults.” Secondhand smoke contains more than 50 cancer-causing chemicals, and is itself a known human carcinogen. Nonsmokers who are exposed to secondhand smoke inhale many of the same toxins as smokers. Even brief exposure to secondhand smoke has immediate adverse effects on the cardiovascular system and increases risk for heart disease and lung cancer, the report says. In addition, the report notes that because the bodies of infants and children are still developing, they are especially vulnerable to the poisons in secondhand smoke.

“The good news is that, unlike some public health hazards, secondhand smoke exposure is easily prevented,” Surgeon General Carmona said. “Smoke-free indoor environments are proven, simple approaches that prevent exposure and harm.” The report finds that even the most sophisticated ventilation systems cannot completely eliminate secondhand smoke exposure and that only smoke-free environments afford full protection.

Surgeon General Carmona noted that levels of cotinine -- a biological marker for secondhand smoke exposure -- measured in nonsmokers have fallen by 70 percent since the late 1980s, and the proportion of nonsmokers with detectable cotinine levels has been halved from 88 percent in 1988-91 to 43 percent in 2001-02.

“Our progress over the past 20 years in clearing the air of tobacco smoke is a major public health success story,” Surgeon General Carmona said. “We have averted many thousands of cases of disease and early death and saved millions of dollars in health care costs.” He emphasized, however, that sustained efforts are required to protect the more than 126 million Americans who continue to be regularly exposed to secondhand smoke in the home, at work, and in enclosed public spaces.

To help communicate the report findings as widely as possible, the Surgeon General unveiled an easy-to-read guide with practical information on the dangers of secondhand smoke and steps people can take to protect themselves.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chimneypeople; fools; pufflist; smokers; smoking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last
End of discussion. Begin blowing smoke now.
1 posted on 06/27/2006 11:34:53 PM PDT by at bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: at bay

2 posted on 06/27/2006 11:40:22 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: at bay
The good old days before the anti-smoking nazis showed up.


3 posted on 06/27/2006 11:42:28 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: at bay

ping


4 posted on 06/27/2006 11:44:09 PM PDT by SR 50 (Larry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SR 50

Got anything with like a head in the sand type thing?


5 posted on 06/27/2006 11:45:08 PM PDT by at bay ("We actually did an evil....." Eric Scmidt, CEO Google)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: at bay

Hey, I`ve been smoking 4 -5 packs of non-filtered camels for the past 30 years and my lung feels great!


6 posted on 06/27/2006 11:46:51 PM PDT by Screamname (Is your terror group depressed? Call 1-800-Demo-crats.....We give hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Screamname
Hey, I`ve been smoking 4 -5 packs of non-filtered camels for the past 30 years and my lung feels great!

Two pack a day of Camels for 52 years (quit 2yrs ago)..!
Not to mention the years of the smoke environment that I was raised in before I started. Last physical was A+.....!!

7 posted on 06/27/2006 11:54:27 PM PDT by Jay Howard Smith (Retired(25yrs)Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Screamname

Been smoking Boros since 1968.


8 posted on 06/28/2006 12:00:41 AM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Screamname
Hey, I`ve been smoking 4 -5 packs of non-filtered camels for the past 30 years and my lung feels great!

Wow. You'd think those packs would be stale by now. What'd non-filter camels cost in '76 anyhow? About eighty cents?

9 posted on 06/28/2006 12:01:01 AM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: at bay
Read some of the comments over here. A couple of us were real busy protecting our rights against the no-smokers.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1656886/posts

I'm sure the same dopey anti-smoking cast of characters will be drifting to this thread.

10 posted on 06/28/2006 12:04:30 AM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
Been smoking Boros since 1968.

Just to make sure this thread ends up being fair and balanced, could we get some comments now from the dead smokers and their second-hand breathers out there. ... Anyone? ... Anyone? ... Hmmmmm, dead silence. That's odd.

11 posted on 06/28/2006 12:18:59 AM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: at bay

Am getting so sick of this. . .smoking would be healthier. . .


12 posted on 06/28/2006 12:20:45 AM PDT by cricket (Live Liberal free; or suffer their consequences. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jay Howard Smith

Well I was just kidding, the puchline being the "my lung" feels great (instead of "lungs"), but seriously, I`ve been smoking 2 packs of red marlboros for about 23 years and I`ve literally never been sick once in those 23 years, I mean not even a cold which is very very strange.

Not saying smoking is a great thing, but I`m just giving my experience. I think alot has to do with genetics, cancer doesn`t run in my family, both my granfathers smoked well into their 80`s and my parents into their 60`s. My Grandmother died of a heart attack at 70 (she smoked) and one Grandfather died from a routine operation for intestinal trouble, (probably caused from nerves living with me)

On the other hand, you will have people who will smoke for only a few years and will immediately get oat cell lung cancer and will be dead in 2 months..I know two women who died that way. One was a co-worker who was a chain smoker and boom, dead 2 months after diagnoses and another was my neighbor who died in her 40`s 10 years after quitting. Both had fast moving lung cancer.

To me, I want to quit because I`m sick of it. It`s too expensive, I can feel it wrecking my energy level, and it throws tar all over the freggin` place. You go in my bathroom, you can literally see the tar dripping down the walls from the condensation when I take a shower. Plus now I am experiencing wheezing when I sleep, so much so that sometimes it wakes me up which I know ain`t a sound of good lungs. That`s the beginnings of emphesyma and I`ll be damned if I need a oxegen tank when I`m 50. Fuuuu--- THAT!


13 posted on 06/28/2006 12:21:59 AM PDT by Screamname (Is your terror group depressed? Call 1-800-Demo-crats.....We give hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: billclintonwillrotinhell

14 posted on 06/28/2006 12:30:42 AM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Screamname
Hey, I`ve been smoking 4 -5 packs of non-filtered camels for the past 30 years and my lung feels great!

What happened to the other lung?

15 posted on 06/28/2006 12:33:11 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cricket
Am getting so sick of this. . .smoking would be healthier.

I agree. Everyone knows the surgeon general has a personal stake in diseminating this garbage (his wife is ceo of Nicorette) but what do I know, I'm a Nazi, now everyone relax after your long journey with a nice hot shower...

16 posted on 06/28/2006 12:33:58 AM PDT by at bay ("We actually did an evil....." Eric Scmidt, CEO Google)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

What other lung???


17 posted on 06/28/2006 12:34:11 AM PDT by Screamname (Is your terror group depressed? Call 1-800-Demo-crats.....We give hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jay Howard Smith

Gramma is 99....smoked til she was 84. So how come she's still here????


18 posted on 06/28/2006 12:42:59 AM PDT by derllak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: at bay
I was really intrigued by your post, and so I went to google it to find out. But all I could find is that he's married to a "Diana Sanchez" but it doesn't appear that she's the CEO of Nicorette (or anything, for that matter).

Where did you get your info.?

19 posted on 06/28/2006 12:45:01 AM PDT by Proud2BAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Real classy, cobra64.

About as classy as blowing smoke in someone's face.


20 posted on 06/28/2006 12:45:39 AM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Screamname
"I`ve literally never been sick once in those 23 years"

Same here.

I think lots of bugs don't like tar or nicotine. Don't the smoking nazis also believe in homeopathy, or whatever it is, poison in small amounts make you immune. Same principal as vaccination?

Hey, smoking could be the universal antidote if you start early enough.

I understand one of the reasons so many kids are on ritilin is because they aren't smoking anymore.

My mother would send me to the store when I was a kid to get her a carton of Camels. $2.00 in 1954. 25 cents in the Army in 1969. My mother is 84 and still going strong, though she made a concession 10 years ago and now smokes lights.

yitbos

21 posted on 06/28/2006 1:09:09 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: billclintonwillrotinhell
Thank you. I try, and I meet uninvited sarcasm with sarcasm.

BTW, what do you think of second hand citrus fruit and peanut derivatives? Hmmmmm? I think they should be outlawed. Along with officious sanctimonious liberal jerks who believe they have a right to tell people how to live. The same mentality as telling everyone to live in a city instead of here:

Because "people have allergies."

My front yard and backyard.

22 posted on 06/28/2006 1:17:26 AM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: at bay

Wouldn't it carry even more weight had he quoted the study performed by teh World Health Organization?

Oh wait, they got rid of theirs, they forgot to have their conslusion first and make the study fit.

Nanny staters and smoke gnatzies on both sides of the aisles.


23 posted on 06/28/2006 1:17:52 AM PDT by DakotaRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Holy sheit! 1954? Oh man, don`t tell me that, I`ll never quit. I don`t understand that, I always see people who have been smoking 9000 years, yet they are still able to breathe, how is that possible? You would figure if the cancer or the heart problems don`t get you, the emphysema will. Damn, I had one guy get in my taxi last year (I drive a taxi) and his lungs literally sounded like cellophane getting crunched up, it totally freaked me out, it was LOUD, and he had the tank and everything and he said he smoked since he was 15 and was in his 60`s. He said if he had a choice he would rather take the cancer as he constantly felt like he is suffocating. His doc said he needed a lung transplant but he was too old or something. I don`t even know if he`s alive anymore, this dude could hardly move without taking a break first. Oh man, I gotta quit, this is nuts.


24 posted on 06/28/2006 1:41:15 AM PDT by Screamname (Is your terror group depressed? Call 1-800-Demo-crats.....We give hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Screamname
"His doc said he needed a lung transplant ..."

My brother-in-law is a doctor. His whole family is LDS (no smoke, no alcohol, no caffeine). That family has been antiseptic since they were born. My sister has 8 kids. They are all sickly. The slightest breaking of the skin causes an infection.

A little poison does wonders. I suppose if my mother dies at 85 they will say it was the smoking. If she lives to be 105 they will say it was the genes.

No death certificate has ever listed "smoking" as the cause of death.

yitbos

25 posted on 06/28/2006 1:53:35 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Yea, I believe it. There was an article I read, I think it was National Geographic a few months ago, that said scientists are doing a study to find why kids on farms are less prone to sickness than other kids..Well because farm kids roll in mud and shiet all day and their bodies are use to it, can handle it, what is there to study? If the immune system is rarely used because a kid lives with his mother who is a cleanliness fanatic, when he visits a farm or some other place where 20 zillion microbes are floating around, he`s going to get annahilated.


26 posted on 06/28/2006 2:09:08 AM PDT by Screamname (Is your terror group depressed? Call 1-800-Demo-crats.....We give hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: at bay
Aren't these the same crowd who say that homeopathy doesn't work because everything is so diluted?

But just one stinky microgram of "secondhand" smoke is a death sentence.

YO! FAT PEOPLE! THEY ARE COMING FOR YOU NEXT!

I think they want us all to quit smoking so they can catch us in the next phase of the nanny state-the 'war' on fat.

27 posted on 06/28/2006 2:14:23 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: at bay

this general thinks you are better off being the smoker than the non smorker getting second hand smoke

when they ban smoking on the planet, that will leave more for me at a mucj lower price



fricken PC idiots


28 posted on 06/28/2006 2:14:32 AM PDT by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: at bay

Another load of BS from the anti-smoking Nazis.


29 posted on 06/28/2006 2:45:56 AM PDT by MaDeuce (Do it to them, before they do it to you! (MaDuce = M2HB .50 BMG))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: at bay


30 posted on 06/28/2006 2:55:46 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Screamname

'Hey, I`ve been smoking 4 -5 packs of non-filtered camels for the past 30 years and my lung feels great!'

I'm not surprised your lungs feel great, that works out to only one cigarette every 110 days! :D


31 posted on 06/28/2006 3:20:27 AM PDT by Vectorian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Screamname

I read not too long ago about the problem in Britain with kids being susceptible to every little thing- and they cited overuse of cleaning agents removing too much of the everyday dirt one needs to build immunity.

As for the secondhand smoke- if it's so bad then they better ban combustion engine vehicles because I'll bet than being stuck behind a bus in traffic is worse than sitting in the same restaurant with a smoker.

I smoked for 20 years and I think I was in better shape both physically and mentally when I smoked. For starters I'm now 10 lbs heavier and my childhood allergies are back.

I'm not saying you shouldn't quit- cost alone was reason enough for me- but I don't think smoking has the same effect on everyone, and there are so many factors in getting cancer that I don't think they can blame it all on cigarettes.


32 posted on 06/28/2006 3:32:58 AM PDT by visualops (If you build it... www.visualops.com ...they won't come. Build the fence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: at bay
I saw this on ABC this AM. Sited the results of studies - didn't say which studies. The whole report ended with ..its good for the children.

Social engineering at its best.

"for the children" is a buzz phrase when they want to make something un-PC and smoking is definitely not PC.

33 posted on 06/28/2006 3:43:23 AM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (Liberals are not bright people - RL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkerbeeCitizen
I'm not saying this is true. I don't trust any "scientific" reports anymore, especially funded by liberal government. But,,,,,,,if true,,,,,,,shouldn't smoking be banned NOW??????

just asking.

34 posted on 06/28/2006 5:23:14 AM PDT by cb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: at bay
Everyone knows the surgeon general has a personal stake in diseminating this garbage (his wife is ceo of Nicorette) but what do I know. . ,.

Well, what can we really say about Dr. Carmona as our Surgeon General. . .; I mean, he did serve in Vietnam. . .

35 posted on 06/28/2006 5:37:23 AM PDT by cricket (Live Liberal free; or suffer their consequences. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: at bay

Nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke at home or work increase their risk of developing heart disease by 25 to 30 percent and lung cancer by 20 to 30 percent.

Same could be said about breathing car exhaust or campfire smoke.


36 posted on 06/28/2006 5:37:57 AM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cb
I don't trust any "scientific" reports anymore, especially funded by liberal government. But,,,,,,,if true,,,,,,,shouldn't smoking be banned NOW??????

. . .that is not how Libs wage war. . .albeit they run a better campaign to thwart the legal vices of Americans; than they do against genuine and immediate threats to civilization. . .civilization. . .

If it were true. . .the majority of posters here. . .the majoriity of subway riders. . .the majority of sports fans. . .< I>the majority of the majority of our population would have already expired. . .which is to say. . .dead and loooong gone.

Meantime, if anyone is worried. . .drink Green tea. . .

37 posted on 06/28/2006 5:47:19 AM PDT by cricket (Live Liberal free; or suffer their consequences. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: cb; All; cricket

hmm. ..a stumble here. ..there; but the message is in tact. . .


38 posted on 06/28/2006 5:48:57 AM PDT by cricket (Live Liberal free; or suffer their consequences. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: at bay

I demand that all motor vehicles and pollution-emmitting factories are banned as well, since there is no "safe" exposure level to their poison, either. Additionally, I want contagious people banned from public places, as transmitted illness kills hundreds of thousands each year.


39 posted on 06/28/2006 5:51:23 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: at bay
From his bio in Wikipedia. Doesn't sound like he's got an agenda http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_H._Carmona

Carmona is also adamantly opposed to tobacco smoking, and has stated more than once that he wants all tobacco sales and consumption prohibited nationwide.

40 posted on 06/28/2006 6:03:57 AM PDT by Bommer (Attention illegals: Why don't you do the jobs we can't do? Like fix your own countries problems!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: at bay

You are correct, this is a money maker for all concerned, including the tobacco companies.

I really get an @ssfull of the holier-than-thou types like my doctor who says smoking "bothers" him.......I replied that listening to spanish spoken in the clinic "bothers" me.....but I sure as h*ll don't see anyone trying to outlaw that!


41 posted on 06/28/2006 6:08:29 AM PDT by newcthem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: at bay

"Nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke at home or work... The report says the only way to protect nonsmokers from the dangerous chemicals in secondhand smoke is to eliminate smoking indoors."

They are coming to a home near you soon.



42 posted on 06/28/2006 6:20:29 AM PDT by takenoprisoner (Sorry Mr. Jefferson, we forfeited the God given rights you all put to pen. We have no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: at bay

Just more hoodoo voodoo from your tax engorged Government.


43 posted on 06/28/2006 6:57:19 AM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
They are coming to a home near you soon.

Yep. All homes must now be "monitored" to make sure you aren't smoking around your kids. After all, "it's for the children...."

And taxes. Or course...

44 posted on 06/28/2006 7:01:45 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (It is not the oath that makes us believe the man, but the man the oath.- Aeschylus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: at bay; All

Question, why do we need a Surgeon General???


45 posted on 06/28/2006 7:06:50 AM PDT by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

We certainly don't need him/her today. But what the heck, we taxpayers pour so much money into DC they just gotta find a way to spend it. Here is how it began:

"In 1871, Woodworth was appointed the first Supervising Surgeon of the Marine Hospital Service. The Service had its origins in a 1798 Act of Congress "for the relief of sick and disabled seamen." The 1798 law created a fund to be used by the Federal Government to provide medical services to merchant seamen in American ports. The marine hospital fund was administered by the Treasury Department and financed through a monthly deduction from the wages of the seamen."

This is a perfect example of how incrementalism works.


46 posted on 06/28/2006 7:48:06 AM PDT by takenoprisoner (Sorry Mr. Jefferson, we forfeited the God given rights you all put to pen. We have no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

ping!


47 posted on 06/28/2006 7:48:59 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (The Left created, embraces and feeds "The Culture of Hate." Make it part of the political lexicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

He is the head of the Public Health Service

Ask yourself this - can you name all 7 uniformed services?

Yup - Health services and the NOAA Commissioned Corps are the two missed most often.


48 posted on 06/28/2006 9:55:58 AM PDT by ASOC (The phrase "What if" or "If only" are for children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: derllak

Or better yet...how did George Burns live to be 100 when he smoked cigars all the time?


49 posted on 07/03/2006 12:42:05 PM PDT by bigdcaldavis (Xandros : In a world without fences, who needs Gates?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

First they came for the smokers. I didn't say anything because I wasn't a smoker.

Next they came for the beer drinkers. I didn't say anything because I didn't drink beer.

Then they came for the junk food eaters. I didn't say anything because I don't eat junk food.

Then they came for the meat eaters. I didn't say anything because I'm a vegetarian.

Finally then came for me, and there was nobody left to defend me.


50 posted on 07/03/2006 12:45:46 PM PDT by bigdcaldavis (Xandros : In a world without fences, who needs Gates?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson