Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roots Of Human Family Tree Are Shallow
ABC News ^ | 7-1-2006 | Matt Clenson

Posted on 07/01/2006 4:12:22 PM PDT by blam

Roots of Human Family Tree Are Shallow

Roots of the Human Family Tree Are Remarkably Shallow - All Alive Today Share 1 Common Ancestor

By MATT CRENSON AP National Writer

Jul 1, 2006 (AP)— Whoever it was probably lived a few thousand years ago, somewhere in East Asia Taiwan, Malaysia and Siberia all are likely locations. He or she did nothing more remarkable than be born, live, have children and die.

Yet this was the ancestor of every person now living on Earth the last person in history whose family tree branches out to touch all 6.5 billion people on the planet today.

That means everybody on Earth descends from somebody who was around as recently as the reign of Tutankhamen, maybe even during the Golden Age of ancient Greece. There's even a chance that our last shared ancestor lived at the time of Christ.

"It's a mathematical certainty that that person existed," said Steve Olson, whose 2002 book "Mapping Human History" traces the history of the species since its origins in Africa more than 100,000 years ago.

It is human nature to wonder about our ancestors who they were, where they lived, what they were like. People trace their genealogy, collect antiques and visit historical sites hoping to capture just a glimpse of those who came before, to locate themselves in the sweep of history and position themselves in the web of human existence.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crevolist; family; garbage; genealogy; godsgravesglyphs; helixmakemineadouble; human; junk; parsimoniousness; roots; shallow; trash; tree; youngearthidiot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last

1 posted on 07/01/2006 4:12:27 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

GGG Ping.


2 posted on 07/01/2006 4:12:57 PM PDT by blam (Monthly Donors Are Happier FReepers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

are they talking about Wilt Chamberlain?


3 posted on 07/01/2006 4:14:48 PM PDT by When do we get liberated? ((Multi-culturism, go for a dirt nap. If you cant stand behind our troops, stand in front of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

Oh, no! We are all the result of sibling matings!

Which may explain some of the obvious genetic defects that show up so often....


4 posted on 07/01/2006 4:16:07 PM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: When do we get liberated?

Kind of flies in the face of the 250KYA tools found near london a couple weeks ago...


5 posted on 07/01/2006 4:16:17 PM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam

Several good candidates- and they're all female, since it's the mitochondrial DNA we're talking about IIRC.

-Eve (or the various "first humans" talked about in the legends of most religions and tribes)

-Mrs. Noah

-The survivors of the last supervolcano eruption 70,000 years ago


6 posted on 07/01/2006 4:16:24 PM PDT by Ostlandr ( CONUS SITREP is foxtrot uniform bravo alfa romeo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Hmm.. I'm skeptical in the utmost extreme. The last common human ancestor needs to cover the Sentinelese, among other aboriginals who were isolated from the main branch of humanity well before recorded history.
7 posted on 07/01/2006 4:16:36 PM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: When do we get liberated?

:-)


8 posted on 07/01/2006 4:16:38 PM PDT by T'wit (It is not possible to "go too far" criticizing liberals. No matter what you say, they're worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam

...one common ancestor?....so did this remarkable being divide spontaneously like an amoeba or what?


9 posted on 07/01/2006 4:17:00 PM PDT by Armigerous ( Non permitte illegitimi te carborundum- "Don't let the bastards grind you down")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

And how would that person, born only about 3000 years ago, manage to relate to, say, isolated jungle tribes or any other similar group which could claim genetic isolation over mllenia? The claim that the most recent common ancestor is that recent sounds implausible.


10 posted on 07/01/2006 4:17:37 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Actually what they're talking about is the apparent evidence that the human race went through a genetic "bottleneck" about 70k years ago. Apparently we went from a thriving species to a small band of survivors.


11 posted on 07/01/2006 4:18:01 PM PDT by Ostlandr ( CONUS SITREP is foxtrot uniform bravo alfa romeo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
Kind of flies in the face of the 250KYA tools found near london a couple weeks ago...

No it wouldn't, actually. Not even remotely so even in the very slightest. That doesn't mean it's accurate (see my post above) but your reply is nonetheless unadulterated nonsense.

12 posted on 07/01/2006 4:19:07 PM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam

The writer said -- "Yet this was the ancestor of every person now living on Earth the last person in history whose family tree branches out to touch all 6.5 billion people on the planet today."

Anyone who has read the Bible knows who the person was.

Try Genesis 7:11-13

11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the fountains of the great deep were broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.

12 And the rain was on the earth forty days and forty nights.

13 On the very same day Noah and Noah's sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth, and Noah's wife and the three wives of his sons with them, entered the ark--

That was my great-great-great [...] grandpa...

Regards,
Star Traveler


13 posted on 07/01/2006 4:19:33 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

One common ancestor? Hmmm. Sounds familiar. Where have I read that before?


14 posted on 07/01/2006 4:21:37 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blam
Roots of the Human Family Tree Are Remarkably Shallow - All Alive Today Share 1 Common Ancestor

HIs name was either Adam or Noah, according to whether or not any humans actually survived the flood other than in the ark.

15 posted on 07/01/2006 4:24:08 PM PDT by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
One ancestral link to another cultural group among your millions of forbears, and you share ancestors with everyone in that group.

The isolated groups that you referenced are "grandfathered in",so as to say. :)

16 posted on 07/01/2006 4:25:16 PM PDT by JimSEA (America cannot have an exit strategy from the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
The last common human ancestor needs to cover the Sentinelese

It says there may be 250 of them even though the 2001 census found only 39. Don't you think a post-tsumani census might be called for?

17 posted on 07/01/2006 4:28:08 PM PDT by FreeKeys ("Journalists almost always screw up science stories." -- Charley Reese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam

Where does Lucy fit in the picture?

"Lucy" was found in 1974 near Hadar in Ethiopia. Her skeleton has provided a wealth of information about the ancestral line of human beings, some of it quite surprising.

Scientists estimate that A. afarensis lived from approximately 4 million years ago (or earlier) to around 2.7 millions years ago.

http://www.wsu.edu/gened/learn-modules/top_longfor/timeline/afarensis/afarensis-a.html


18 posted on 07/01/2006 4:32:22 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Darwin commented that all species came from a single mated pair of its kind where pairing was a requisite to reproduction.


19 posted on 07/01/2006 4:34:05 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

A bit nutcasey, this post (original article). It'll soon get replaced with other--probably errant--philosophies.


20 posted on 07/01/2006 4:37:12 PM PDT by guitarist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson