Posted on 07/01/2006 4:21:15 PM PDT by Dane
Will Mexico Go Left or Stay Conservative? By MARK STEVENSON , 07.01.2006, 11:52 AM
Mexicans buffeted by a mudslinging, polarized presidential campaign are choosing Sunday between plunging into Latin America's left-wing tide or electing a conservative who favors free trade and globalization.
With leftist Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador and conservative Felipe Calderon running neck-and-neck, the election - which will also pick both houses of congress and five governors - hinges on class divisions that have seldom been talked about so openly in Mexican politics.
For 71 years, until President Vicente Fox's victory in 2000, the Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI, ruled Mexico by claiming to represent all economic classes. Fox's victory ushered in full democracy and bettered life for the middle class but failed to create millions of jobs, tame Mexico's drug barons or settle its migrant-labor problems with the U.S.
Today, half of Mexico's 103 million people live on $4.50 a day and the poorest 20 million earn half that - a social and cultural gulf that has been the cornerstone of Lopez Obrador's campaign to succeed Fox, who is constitutionally barred from seeking-re-election.
The divide was on vivid display recently as his supporters cut through a swanky Mexico City shopping mall on their way to a campaign rally. Farming families who had never encountered escalators were hesitant to get on them, drawing disdainful looks from well-dressed onlookers.
This election boils down to a race between those strangers in the shopping mall and Mexicans who fear losing the low-interest loans and economic stability that emerged under Fox's disciplined budgets and high international reserves.
Santino Sanchez Juarez, 87, is one of the former. He barely survived doing odd jobs until Lopez Obrador, as Mexico City mayor, gave the elderly $65 monthly pensions.
"He is the only one with a heart, who cares for the people," said Sanchez Juarez.
He expressed a certain nostalgia for Adolfo Lopez Mateos who, as president from 1958 to 1964, used charisma, nationalism and populist handouts to the poor, but also crushed dissent and antagonized the United States.
Lopez Obrador shares that nostalgia, and his conservative opponent's campaign has been largely based on stoking fears that the left-winger is a clone of Hugo Chavez, Venezuela's Cuba-friendly president, and will foment class divisions while returning Mexico to the last debt-ridden years of PRI rule.
The PRI now looks like a spent force, with its candidate, Roberto Madrazo, trailing third in the polls, and Calderon's line of attack seems to have won some supporters.
Listening to Lopez Obrador, "It's almost as though, if you're not poor, he doesn't want to know about you," said Marisol Castro, 55, a middle-class nutritionist from the western city of Zamora.
Victory for Lopez Obrador would be a crowning moment for Latin America's left-wing renaissance, which has captured or held onto the presidency in Venezuela, Brazil, Bolivia, Chile and Argentina.
Lopez Obrador has sought to distance himself from the leftist surge, painting himself as a moderate with such benign slogans as "Happiness is on the way." But he also rails against "those on top," pledges to make the rich pay more taxes and wants to restore a sense of national pride, in part by standing up to the United States on issue such as farm trade.
His supporters sometimes heckle opponents' campaign events, cry conspiracy if polls show him faltering and pass out leaflets saying "only Lopez Obrador can win" - fraught language in a country that fears violence if he is defeated.
The last polls all showed a statistically insignificant gap between the front-runners. First results will come in by about 9 p.m. EDT Sunday.
For all the divisions exposed in the campaign, there is much that all three candidates agree on. They advocate close U.S. ties and U.S. immigration reform that would allow more Mexicans to work legally north of the border. They all promise to crack down on crime, and Lopez Obrador has called for the army to play a greater role in fighting drug trafficking - a departure from the left's anti-military tradition.
"There are areas of the country that the government doesn't even control. The drug cartels control them, so we should give thanks if the Mexican government can recover its sovereignty," said Porfirio Munoz Ledo, a Lopez Obrador adviser. "If we can't do that, we won't have good relations with anybody abroad."
Some ghosts of the PRI years have been laid to rest. A stable economy has ended a history of boom-and-bust cycles, and a strong, respected election authority has made vote fraud and dirty tricks much harder to pull off.
But even if a candidate wins handsomely, he is unlikely to command a majority in the new Congress, and may face the same frustrations as Fox did in trying to get his more ambitious programs approved.
Calderon has offered almost as many giveaways as his allegedly free-spending opponent, but has also endorsed some of Fox's most exclusionary policies, such as a law that all but guarantees the stranglehold of a few large companies over the media sector.
Lopez Obrador's campaign has already absorbed some of the old-guard elements of the PRI by building a base of Mexico City government employees as well as beneficiaries of government programs, the kind of patronage machine that kept the PRI in power for decades.
"This is a choice between two clearly distinct proposals that differ over the central theme, which is inequality," said writer Carlos Monsivais. "That's the structural problem of this country."
Its conservative? God help us.
WE NEED A WALL!!!!
If this election in Mexico goes to the Left then we might as well get the brick and mortar out to build that wall, and it better be manned with armed soldiers with machine guns and guard dogs.
Actually with the election neck and neck, your above is false, but doesn't stop your knee jerk comments which in the 70's about you commenting about Eastern Europe could have been, "There is no urge for individual liberty and freedom among the people."
Yeah! A wall...and a law limiting the money they send home.
Shortly followed by a good old fashioned Mexican revolution.
There are plenty of good places along the border where we could put lawn chairs and popcorn machines. Entertainment abounds.
Mexico, a country with resources and a conservative and religious population, cannot hope to be self-sufficient as long as the current situation is in place.
Mexico will stay left no matter which guy wins. The choice is between a 'lefty' or an 'extreme lefty'.
That one sentence speaks volumes about the sad state of Mexico. Ignorance and elitism functioning in a socialist state is a recipe for disaster. The USA should examine Mexico closely and do everything possible to avoid making the same mistakes. That surely includes resisting Mexico's attempts to export their problems to the USA.
Conventionally, when the MSM claims two campaigns are "neck and neck," they are trying to pump up the leftist candidate. I'm not sure if that applies to international elections, however, "neck and neck" might simply mean "we are to cheap/lazy to go there and find out."
Also, when they talk about a "mudslinging" campaign, it means they aren't sure the liberal/leftist will win. Although I have to say, I think a victory by Lopez Obrador is almost certain.
Conservative? What a pathetic joke.
Just one thing - the federal government providing low levels of wealth that allow people to be non-productive for life. Mexican level poverty is already here - it's just hidden by welfare payments.
Yes, but I'm afraid it looks bad for Calderon. Unlike Fox, he is not a number-one type. He is an obvious number-two. Especially in a culture like Mexico, that matters -- especially when a candidate is talking economic reality, not economic fantasy, something that is usually a big risk in mass politics.
If "The OB Method" wins, I'm seriously going to consider selling my house in LaPaz.
Mexico is like your always broke, thrice-divorced brother-in-law with the `drinking problem', while Canada is your mild-mannered bachelor CPA uncle: unk's always welcome, even if you're not sure he's there; while your brother-in-law wants money, a couch to crash or throws up in your pool, or all three.
I knew it was you before I read the name, because your post was snide and meaningless.
The present government of Mexico is conservative,Where did that fantasy come from?I always thought it was a criminal enterprise.Only the wealthy benefit in that dump.
There is a great difference between the two groups in the degree of ignorance and isolation, i.e., the degree of knowledge and understanding of the world at large outside their local community. The 'poor' in the USA own televisions, often with cable service, cell phones, iPods, CD players and radios. They are constantly exposed to the most diverse selection of what a vibrant economy offers, and usually have material possessions that are the envy of the poor in Mexico. In the USA, the poor are very unlikely to be cowed into submission because of ignorance of their situation and rights in our society. That is a very good thing.
The poor in this country will remain poor, and probably become more useless with each passing generation, as long as they equate watching Oprah on a plasma TV with knowledge or initiative.
We are in complete agreement on that point!
NO IT (MEXICO) IS NOT CONSERVATIVE...
"STAY" conservative?
Oh man the AP is farther gone than I thought.
lol, depends on what the definition of conservatism is?
"Exclusive Commentary Mexico: On the brink of Marxism"
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50858
Mexico is a fascist oligarchy
...but certainly not conservative...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.