Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Treason is deeply embedded in the Democratic Party and the New York Times
http://www.brookesnews.com ^ | Monday 3 July 2006 | Gerard Jackson

Posted on 07/02/2006 6:40:28 PM PDT by luv2ndamend

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: conservatism_IS_compassion; luv2ndamend

A keeper!


61 posted on 07/03/2006 11:31:23 AM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Excellent! Yours?


62 posted on 07/03/2006 11:32:06 AM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend

How about the public's right to know what's in the Barrett report? I'm still waiting for a leak on that.


63 posted on 07/03/2006 6:28:15 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (Stop the ACLU - Support the Public Expression of Religion Act 2005 - Call your congressmen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

Yes, that would be nice too see. But, as you know Bill and Hillary would not like that. The "Red Rag" would never print something that would hurt one of their own. Red ain't dead, it is alive and kicking.


64 posted on 07/03/2006 6:43:38 PM PDT by luv2ndamend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

If you were called a traitor, or that your actions and words were treasonous -- why wouldn't you respond, unless you were actively, knowingly being treasonous?

If I were to simply say it, that Democrats are acting in a treasonous manner, then why wouldn't any number of Democrats highlight that I had no support for my claims, or didn't list any?

If I provided support for claiming that the Dems were acting subversively, treaonously -- wouldn't any number of Democrats come forward and rebut my contention, providing reasoning of their own as to why my claims were false, or untrue?

Where are they? The Democrats with even average intelligence who can describe why they, themselves aren't a traitor or subversive, or that the party is not so inclined?

No, only the idiots reply, calling names and running away from reality at a significant portion of the speed of light. . .

You can see that the Democrat party is the party of treason by the extreme *red*shift in their image; when it isn't a cowardly show of belly to the Islamic cult performing human sacrifice to enforce their religious insanity on ALL the rest of the world. . .

Cowardly running-yellow-dog-democrats and traitors . . . all rolled into one huge, subversive and seditious party . . . jackasses, assuredly!


65 posted on 08/23/2006 5:42:42 AM PDT by tadowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson