Posted on 07/03/2006 9:22:57 AM PDT by george76
FreeRepublic.com has organized a demonstration outside the Washington DC office of the New York Times, today at 12 noon: Groups to Protest Treasonous Reporting.
The D.C. Chapter of FreeRepublic.com, an independent grassroots conservative organization, and Accuracy in Media (AIM) will hold a demonstration at noon, Monday, July 3, at the Washington, D.C., bureau of The New York Times, 1627 I St., NW, to call for the prosecution of New York Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., Executive Editor Bill Keller and reporters James Risen and Eric Lichtblau for giving aid and comfort to al Qaeda by publishing stories exposing national security intelligence programs.
(Excerpt) Read more at littlegreenfootballs.com ...
Groups to Protest Treasonous Reporting by New York Times at Washington, D.C. Bureau on Monday
To: Assignment Desk, Daybook Editor
Contact: Kristinn Taylor of the D.C. Chapter of Free Republic.com, 202-309-1589 or kristinn@verizon.net
News Advisory:
WHAT: Groups to Protest Treasonous Reporting by New York Times at Washington, D.C. Bureau on Monday
WHEN: Monday, July 3 at 12 p.m.
WHERE: 1627 I Street NW, Washington, D.C.
The D.C. Chapter of FreeRepublic.com, an independent grassroots conservative organization, and Accuracy in Media (AIM) will hold a demonstration at noon, Monday, July 3, at the Washington, D.C., bureau of The New York Times, 1627 I St., NW, to call for the prosecution of New York Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., Executive Editor Bill Keller and reporters James Risen and Eric Lichtblau for giving aid and comfort to al Qaeda by publishing stories exposing national security intelligence programs.
Despite pleadings from the federal government and Democrat and Republican members of the 9/11 Commission, The Times recently published a report detailing lawful surveillance of international banking transactions that was employed to prevent terror attacks.
This report followed The Times' publication last year exposing the federal government’s NSA surveillance of international based phone and electronic communications aimed at preventing terror attacks. Incredibly, The Times was awarded a Pulitzer Prize for that story.
When confronted at the April 2006 annual Times meeting by AIM editor Cliff Kincaid about the NSA story, Sulzberger said that he and his editors "made the decision that, in the battles between civil liberties on the one hand and national security on the other, civil liberties won."
To which Kincaid responded, "Whose civil liberties are you talking about? Certainly not the civil liberties of those Americans who are possible victims of a terrorist attack carried out by the terrorists who are under surveillance. So whose civil liberties are you protecting in this case by going public and alerting our enemies as to what we're doing?"
Kristinn Taylor, co-leader of the D.C. Chapter of FreeRepublic.com said of The Times, "As a military family member, I find it appalling that The New York Times would place the lives of soldiers in the field and civilians at home in danger by giving our national security secrets to al Qaeda. Suzlberger, Keller, Risen and Lichtblau are nothing more than ink stained enemy combatants who should be prosecuted for treason."
On the Web: http://www.FreeRepublic.com and http://www.aim.org
http://www.usnewswire.com/
This is the missing link.
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=68619
The New York Times is a national security threat!
Pin.....
.....naw. I said I'd leave you alone. :)
Carry on. :)
Funny tagline!
I love you.
Thank you.
(Courtesy of reader Les Baitzer.)
Posted by Scott
http://powerlineblog.com/archives/014587.php
arrest - indict - convict - hang
And a disgrace to our great country.
GO DC CHAPTER FREEPERS!
You should ping solamente. He'd want to know about this.
I think we ragged him enough for a while. :)
New Yorkers, our turn is July 10th at 5:00 at the lair of the beast.
They are now becoming less-than-cooperative since their banks were exposed as being "complicit" with the President's efforts in stemming the flow of money.
Attention NYT: Your actions have consequences.
The NY Slimes are helping the terrorists on purpose.
The Slimes hope the terrorists kill more Americans...
IMHO.
Well thank you very much. And that is much better than the traditional response from some, which would be the exact opposite...
Since the NYSlimes decides that everyone on the right is guilty, no matter the evidence or the details, I say we go right to HANG and forget about the indict, etc.
That's hilarious! LOL
Hey Bushitler, leave my infidel friend alone!
New Yorker mini-ping.
AM
D.C. Freepers ROCK! Can't wait to see pics!
Well, I feel I finally got some justice, however sparingly it was.
This was bound to happen. The premise behind the First Amendment as it applies to the press--that a vigilant watchdog is necessary, sufficient--indeed, possible--to protect against man's basest instincts--is tautologically flawed: The fox guarding the White House, if you will. Walter Lippmann, the 20th-century American columnist, wrote, "A free press is not a privilege, but an organic necessity in a great society." True in theory. True even in Lippmann's quaint mid-20th-century America, perhaps. But patently false in this postmodern era of the bubbas and the Pinches. When a free and great society is hijacked by a seditious bunch of dysfunctional, power-hungry malcontents and elitists, it will remain neither free nor great for long. When hijacked by them in the midst of asymmetric warfare, it will soon not remain at all. If President George W. Bush is serious about winning the War on Terror, he will aggressively pursue the enemy in our midst. Targeting and defeating the enemy in our midst is, by far, the more difficult task and will measure Bush's resolve and courage (and his independence from the MPRDC (mutual protection racket in DC)) more than any pretty speech, more even than 'staying the course.'
|
Below is a comparison chart showing what a terrible investment the NY Slimes, NYT, has been for the last two years. For comparison, NYT is compared to MDY, the ETF fund for the mid cap index, and HAL, the "hated and evil" Haliburton.
If your mutual fund owns NYT, sell it or trade it for a fund that doesn't own this liberal loss leader stock. Send a letter to the Fund Manager and CEO of the Mutual Fund Company and tell them you sold the fund. Then demand to know why they invested your $'s in this turkey. Then send the SEC and ask them to investigate why the mutual fund invested in NYT. The investment was not in your best interest. It helped the NY Slimes to stay afloat and publish seditious articles.
Ahh, you liked that one!!
That is good !
liberal moron ping
...or Medium...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
