Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

With Injuries Up, Feds Eye Fireworks Laws
http://www.comcast.net ^ | 7 4 06 | MICHAEL J. SNIFFEN

Posted on 07/03/2006 11:59:22 PM PDT by freepatriot32

WASHINGTON - On the eve of the nation's noisiest holiday, the Consumer Product Safety Commission responded to growing fireworks injuries by quietly reopening the question of how it should police explosives for backyard entertainment.

Without a public meeting, the three commissioners voted unanimously by ballot late Friday to begin a study of whether to tighten their regulation of fireworks, commission spokesman Scott Wolfson announced Monday. Their notice seeking public comment will appear soon in the Federal Register.

The notice cited a disturbing increase in injuries and a decrease in compliance with safety regulations as reasons for the first major review of commission fireworks regulations since 1976.

"It's worth pursing an effort to see how we can once again drive down injuries," Wolfson said.

The commission's only Democrat, Thomas H. Moore, criticized the panel for acting by private ballot. "The commission's deliberations are supposed to be done in public," Moore said. "We do not serve the public well when we take the first step in a possible rule-making in this manner."

The commission's just-released study of fireworks injuries in 2005 estimated 10,800 people required emergency room treatment. That figure has risen steadily since an estimated 8,000 required treatment in 2002.

The figures show a small but steady rise in firework injuries compared with the nation's growing population: from 2.6 injuries per 100,000 people in 1996 to 3.6 per 100,000 in 2005 _ a decade in which the use of fireworks soared.

A special commission study estimated that 60 percent of last year's injuries occurred within two weeks of the July Fourth holiday, when most of the nation's backyard fireworks are exploded. Children accounted for a substantial share of the victims: 45 percent of the victims were under 15 and more than half were under 20.

At the same time, the commission's sampling of imported fireworks found a sharp drop last year in compliance with its safety regulations. From 2002 through 2004, 71 percent to 73 percent of imported fireworks complied with federal regulations, but in 2005 that figure plunged to 59 percent.

Most fireworks are imported, mostly from China, which supplied $164.2 million of the total $172.5 million worth imported in 2004.

The panel did not promise to issue new rules but said it would consider requiring manufacturers to test their products and certify they comply with safety requirements; adding new requirements that fireworks must meet; continuing a largely voluntary safety program; or banning some devices case-by-case.

The commission's mandatory regulations are far less extensive than voluntary ones issued by the American Fireworks Standards Laboratory. The lab, founded in 1989 by the fireworks industry, is governed by a board representing companies that manufacture or import fireworks.

For instance, the AFSL sets maximum powder limits to regulate the power of explosives intended for consumers. The federal commission has no such limits.

AFSL executive director John Rogers said the lab has added standards as dozens of new products have been introduced since 1976, but the commission's rules have changed little since then.

Without predicting a response to a notice his group hasn't seen, Rogers said it has long thought the commission should adopt AFSL's voluntary standards as mandatory. "Our standards are far more comprehensive and far-reaching than CPSC's and by adhering to ours, fireworks would be safer and have less potential for injury."

The commission said manufacturers certified as complying with AFSL standards fared much better in its survey of imports. Some 83 percent of those fireworks were in compliance with federal rules, compared with 59 percent of all imported fireworks sampled last year.

Julie Heckman, executive director of the American Pyrotechnics Association, an industry trade group, said, "We do see a need to extend compliance more broadly in China."

The commission and AFSL have made fireworks substantially safer since 1976, while usage soared from 29 million pounds in 1976 to 118 million pounds in 1996 and 281.5 million pounds last year, Heckman said. The rate of injury has plummeted from 38.3 injuries per 100,000 pounds of fireworks in 1976, to 6.1 in 1996 and to 3.6 in 2005.

"The product coming into the United States now for backyard use is the highest quality and safest it's ever been," Heckman said.

The largest safety problem is product misuse rather than product failures, Heckman said. "It's teenagers having bottle rocket wars, parents giving sparklers to 2-year-olds and people having too much to drink and putting firecrackers up their nose."

___

On the Net:

Consumer Product Safety Commission:

http://www.cpsc.gov

American Pyrotechnics Association:

http://www.americanpyro.com/


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: cpsc; eye; feds; fireworks; govwatch; handwringersdontrest; injuries; laws; libertarians; mommysam; nannystate; up; with; youllshootyoureyeout
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-79 next last
Happy independence day. I just wonder when we are going to become independent of all this nanny state B.S. If you spend your entire life covered in bubble wrap with nerf padding over every sharp corner in your house your just excisting not living and its high time the feds and most state governments learn that life is 100 percent fatal nobody gets out alive.
1 posted on 07/03/2006 11:59:27 PM PDT by freepatriot32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gabz

nanny state ping


2 posted on 07/04/2006 12:00:03 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; Americanwolfsbrother; Annie03; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
3 posted on 07/04/2006 12:02:07 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Nanny statism isn't freedom.


4 posted on 07/04/2006 12:02:10 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

It makes you wonder why there's never been a successful anarchist or libertarian state.


5 posted on 07/04/2006 12:12:39 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
The largest safety problem is product misuse rather than product failures, Heckman said. "It's teenagers having bottle rocket wars, parents giving sparklers to 2-year-olds and people having too much to drink and putting firecrackers up their nose."

A quick Google search will turn up not just one, but several, videos of teenagers shooting bottle rockets out their butt.

6 posted on 07/04/2006 12:15:26 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
The largest safety problem is product misuse rather than product failures, Heckman said. "It's teenagers having bottle rocket wars, parents giving sparklers to 2-year-olds and people having too much to drink and putting firecrackers up their nose."

LOL. Hey, y'all, hold muh beer and watch this!

7 posted on 07/04/2006 12:17:08 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

These lard ass Feds oughtta FOAD.


8 posted on 07/04/2006 12:17:22 AM PDT by dennisw (Confucius say man who go through turnstile sideways going to Bangkok.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Trotting out more "victims" in order to abridge the freedom of non-victims everywhere.


9 posted on 07/04/2006 12:19:57 AM PDT by JennysCool (Roll out the Canarble Wagon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
The commission and AFSL have made fireworks substantially safer since 1976, while usage soared from 29 million pounds in 1976 to 118 million pounds in 1996 and 281.5 million pounds last year, Heckman said. The rate of injury has plummeted from 38.3 injuries per 100,000 pounds of fireworks in 1976, to 6.1 in 1996 and to 3.6 in 2005.

Apparently, the voluntary standards worked.

10 posted on 07/04/2006 12:20:13 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
...teenagers shooting bottle rockets out their butt...


11 posted on 07/04/2006 12:32:47 AM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

12 posted on 07/04/2006 12:35:11 AM PDT by Hexenhammer (America for Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

Jenny for President!

Imagine what a fine job they'd do on fireworks after the magnificant work they did on Katrina?

Let's just give up state's rights and local controls and let these genius's fix every thing.

NOT!


13 posted on 07/04/2006 12:35:20 AM PDT by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Happy independence day.

BWAHAHAHAHA! I mean, uh, thanks, you too.

My fireworks come from Remington, Federal and Winchester.

14 posted on 07/04/2006 12:38:06 AM PDT by NoCurrentFreeperByThatName
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
Trotting out more "victims" in order to abridge the freedom of non-victims everywhere.

bump...

I heard you were cool.

15 posted on 07/04/2006 12:39:43 AM PDT by NoCurrentFreeperByThatName
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
I can't locate it online, but the late and great Jeff McNeilly drew a marvelous cartoon which I saved in my scrapbook:

Uncle Sam, in a baby carriage, being pushed by a huge, fat, overbearing Nanny:

Nanny: "You smoke too much! You drink too much! You eat too much!"

Sam: ( rummaging through his suitcoat ) "Where'd I put my pistol?"

16 posted on 07/04/2006 1:23:17 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an Old Keyboard Cowboy, Ridin' the Trakball into the Dawn of Information)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hexenhammer

Okay, where did you get that video? what exactly is happening there?


17 posted on 07/04/2006 2:29:42 AM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

I miss MacNeilly!


18 posted on 07/04/2006 2:31:40 AM PDT by GodBlessRonaldReagan (Count Petofi will not be denied!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GodBlessRonaldReagan
I miss MacNeilly!

He was first featured ( much as Dave Barry was ) in my local paper before he came to national attention.

Two cartoons I saved and remember:

1)- a brooding, odious Keep, sewage pouring out of pipes sticking out of it, and a Soviet flag flying... the voice-over in the balloon above it, "I'm getting worried about our image..."

2)- the Ayatollah Komeni riding and oxcart named "Iran" over a hill... and the sign by the road reads:

"Leaving 20th Century
Please Dim Lights"

19 posted on 07/04/2006 2:46:45 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an Old Keyboard Cowboy, Ridin' the Trakball into the Dawn of Information)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
and=an

PIMF ( preview, it's mah friend... )

20 posted on 07/04/2006 2:49:02 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an Old Keyboard Cowboy, Ridin' the Trakball into the Dawn of Information)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

And our taxdollars actually pay for this garbage. Pathetic.


21 posted on 07/04/2006 3:06:15 AM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Seems to me that when the population increases, the number of people born stupid increases. Therefore more injuries . Just ban stupid people and everything will be OK ! Ban all fireworks and the homemade BIG bangs will increase in direct proportion.


22 posted on 07/04/2006 4:13:38 AM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
"It's teenagers having bottle rocket wars,...

Awww heck... we did that alot back when I was young.

We were country boys who knew enough to put plenty of distance between you and your opponent.

No one was ever injured. Just clean fun.

23 posted on 07/04/2006 4:36:30 AM PDT by Northern Yankee ( Stay The Course!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Renegade
Just ban stupid people and everything will be OK !

Agreed!

Problem is there is just too damn many of them. ; )

24 posted on 07/04/2006 4:39:24 AM PDT by Northern Yankee ( Stay The Course!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Though many people here in Spain are content to sit back and watch the government take away all kinds of freedoms, we still are allowed to use fireworks. As far as I know there is little regulation in this area other than the fireworks shacks that pop up in the beginning of june (the fireworks holiday is St Joan - or summer solstice) need to be isolated from surrounding buildings and technically you're probably not allowed to sell the crazy stuff to minors. People go bezerk with fireworks here and families are pretty easy going when it comes to letting their kids set them off. Every year there are a few injuries (usually less than 5 are reported and not very serious) and something always catches on fire (usually the forest when there's no rain, like this year).There is never a public outcry for regulation. and people sort of look at the accidents like "well, you have to be careful with fireworks or you'll get hurt".
I really really wish the government would try to outlaw this...no i'm not a nanny state liberal...why do i want the government to get involved? well...I believe that IF there were to be a proposed prohibition of fireworks there would be such an outrage that it might carry over into other areas and draw attention to just how little freedom we have left. I am probably dreaming though
25 posted on 07/04/2006 5:14:43 AM PDT by freedom moose (has de cultivar el que sembres)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
parents giving sparklers to 2-year-olds and people having too much to drink and putting firecrackers up their nose
Ok the sparklers I believe, but the firecrackers in the nose thing seems like BS. Of course if anyone is dumb enough to actually do that, they get what they deserve AND no amount of laws will prevent them from being a moron
26 posted on 07/04/2006 5:17:17 AM PDT by freedom moose (has de cultivar el que sembres)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

When liberty is outlawed only outlaws will have liberty


27 posted on 07/04/2006 5:29:27 AM PDT by Bear_Slayer (When liberty is outlawed only outlaws will have liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom moose

Some day, hopefully, our legislators will realize that it is impossible to legislate stupidity. That may not happen because most of our legislators are too stupid to recognize stupidity.


28 posted on 07/04/2006 5:49:35 AM PDT by thile44 (Simplicity is too complex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
A quick Google search will turn up not just one, but several, videos of teenagers shooting bottle rockets out their butt.

I have to tell you...the first thought that came to my mind when I read your post was, "What neuro-synaptic chain of events would possess FreedomCalls to put together a certain string of words into the google search box that would return pictures of bottle-rockets eminating from the rear-ends of teenagers?"

After a moment, I realized that I did not want to know.

29 posted on 07/04/2006 6:09:31 AM PDT by ImaGraftedBranch ("Toleration" has never been affiliated with the virtuous. Think about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32; Just another Joe; CSM; lockjaw02; Publius6961; elkfersupper; nopardons; metesky; ...

Nanny State Ping..............


Happy Birthday America.


30 posted on 07/04/2006 6:09:41 AM PDT by Gabz (Taxaholism, the disease you elect to have (TY xcamel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

31 posted on 07/04/2006 6:13:17 AM PDT by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
people having too much to drink and putting firecrackers up their nose.

It's time for them to go...

32 posted on 07/04/2006 6:22:35 AM PDT by GregoryFul (cheap, immigrant labor built America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Good thing the Republicans are in charge, or we might see a lot of stifling government regulation. :-P


33 posted on 07/04/2006 6:33:59 AM PDT by B Knotts (Newt '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
The commission and AFSL have made fireworks substantially safer since 1976, while usage soared from 29 million pounds in 1976 to 118 million pounds in 1996 and 281.5 million pounds last year, Heckman said. The rate of injury has plummeted from 38.3 injuries per 100,000 pounds of fireworks in 1976, to 6.1 in 1996 and to 3.6 in 2005.

I know someone else mentioned it, but it seems to me that this disproves the Commission's attitude regarding an increasein injuries. By the numbers that maybe so, as the ppulation has increased since 1976. However by percentage of the population it seems to me there are many other things in life far more dangerous than dealing with fireworks.

34 posted on 07/04/2006 6:37:47 AM PDT by Gabz (Taxaholism, the disease you elect to have (TY xcamel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

35 posted on 07/04/2006 6:43:34 AM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

"It's teenagers having bottle rocket wars, parents giving sparklers to 2-year-olds and people having too much to drink and putting firecrackers up their nose."

Around here, we just call that "thinning the herd." ;)


36 posted on 07/04/2006 6:45:54 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
...a decrease in compliance...

Well gosh. The only thing that's going to fix that is...more regulations, by golly!

37 posted on 07/04/2006 6:46:17 AM PDT by Doohickey (Democrats are nothing without a constituency of victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

That's because a gentle society goes through great measures to protect the stupid from themselves. These people used to delete themselves from the gene pool. Now, they're reproducing like rabbits.


38 posted on 07/04/2006 6:50:31 AM PDT by Doohickey (Democrats are nothing without a constituency of victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Same here.


39 posted on 07/04/2006 6:50:38 AM PDT by Gabz (Taxaholism, the disease you elect to have (TY xcamel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: freedom moose
I believe that IF there were to be a proposed prohibition of fireworks there would be such an outrage that it might carry over into other areas and draw attention to just how little freedom we have left.

Probably not. Here in NY fireworks are illegal, but if you aren't doing anything excessive the police will almost always just give you a "warning" and tell you not to wake the neighbors who called to complain.

40 posted on 07/04/2006 7:00:55 AM PDT by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GodBlessRonaldReagan

Greatest political cartoonist of all time, IMO.


41 posted on 07/04/2006 7:16:49 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (What you know about that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

So when is election day for members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission? I don't recall voting for these people.


42 posted on 07/04/2006 7:16:49 AM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave
You don't get a vote. You see the politicians have devised a way to pass unpopular and illegal laws by appointing party hacks to commissioners, boards, authorities, and panels.

This permits them to avoid taking unpopular stances and keeps their pudgy backsides safe from retribution from the voters.

The voters should demand an end to these panels and boards but most are too stupid to realize that their freedom has been diminished and their lives are run by an unelected authoritarian group of dictators.

43 posted on 07/04/2006 8:02:02 AM PDT by metalurgist (Believe in my God or I will kill you! The cry of all religious extremists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

You can't have a little bit of a Nanny State. Government knows best in so many areas, why not add fireworks to the list?


44 posted on 07/04/2006 8:03:46 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

Thanks for the ping!


45 posted on 07/04/2006 8:05:16 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
"It's teenagers having bottle rocket wars...

Ahhhh...memories.

Our idea of a safe bottle rocket war was using aluminum garbage can lids as shields.

46 posted on 07/04/2006 8:08:14 AM PDT by Recovering Hermit (Apparently, most who protest for peace do so at the expense of hygiene.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mugs99

It's more like: Big Mother is Watching You.


47 posted on 07/04/2006 8:25:31 AM PDT by kcar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Unfortunately, nanny staters seem to be gaining in power, not losing it. Even so-called conservatives seem to be jumping on the nanny state band wagon, "for the public good."

Smoking bans, helmets, seat belts, fatty foods, alcohol, tree cutting restrictions, fuel mileage mandates, airbags, seat belts, ever rising taxes on certain "sinful" items, the list goes on and on.

Sometimes, I don't think they will wake up until they are totally under the socialists thumb.


48 posted on 07/04/2006 10:26:38 AM PDT by DakotaRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
It makes you wonder why there's never been a successful anarchist or libertarian state.

Oh, but there has been.

That would have been the United States of America from the date founded until about the mid-1920's

49 posted on 07/04/2006 1:51:43 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Inviting massive civil disobedience.

Which in my book is a good thing.

50 posted on 07/04/2006 1:54:39 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson