Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MUSIC INDUSTRY CRACKS DOWN
WPTV News ^ | July 3, 2006 | Reported By: Shannon Cake

Posted on 07/04/2006 7:00:49 AM PDT by Fawn

Louise: "No these are not my songs." They are however downloaded right onto her computer.

Louise:"I was embarrassed when they gave me a print out of these songs."

She got this printout because of lawyers. She also got this letter telling her she was being sued for copyright infringement.

Parents, there are other popular file sharing programs you need to know about:

Morpheus: morpheus.com

Kazaa: www.kazaa.com
Bearshare: www.bearshare.com
Limewire: www.limewire.com

Louise: "I was in shock..I was stunned."

The letter is part of a music industry crackdown.Singers, songwriters and music companies tired of people downloading and burning copies of music without paying.

The letter to Louise says: "Copyright theft is not a victimless crime. Not just recording artists and songwriters but session players, sound engineers, cd plant workers, wharehouse personnel, record store clerks...that depend on sale of recordings to earn a living."

Louise: "I didn't intentionally try to take money from these people...I didn't know what was going on!"

Louise says it was her 16 year old doing the downloading. But that doesn't matter--these lawyers are offering to settle for a price.

Louise: "3700....I dont have 3700."

But Louise has to pay even though she had no idea, this music has been hanging around on her harddrive. Louise says her son didn't know that downloading the songs was illegal either but because she didn't take the music industry's first settlement offer the price has now gone up: 4500 or they will take her to court.

Interestingly enough, during our investigating today, we found the country of Austrailia has banned the use of Kazaa. And guess where Kazaa's parent company is located?

You guessed it! Sydney, Australia.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bearshare; bittorrent; filesharing; hollywoodisdead; kazaa; limewire; morpheus; music
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-189 next last
Me thinks me in trouble.

I heard they are sending alot of these out lately.

1 posted on 07/04/2006 7:00:54 AM PDT by Fawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fawn
wharehouse

apparently the music industry does not know how to spell.

2 posted on 07/04/2006 7:05:07 AM PDT by wildwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

I have lots of songs also. But I turned off "sharing" so nobody can get them from me.

It seems they go after the ones who have lots of songs that are available to others.


3 posted on 07/04/2006 7:06:22 AM PDT by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
Legalized extortion. But hey the price for beating a copyright rap is $4500. Never mind if you didn't know they were copyrighted materials. I stay the hell from file-sharing software and I loathe the thugs at RIAA who have nothing better to do with their time than to go after people just listening to music at home.

(The Palestinian terrorist regime is the crisis and Israel's fist is the answer.)

4 posted on 07/04/2006 7:06:46 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

One word: BitTorrent.


5 posted on 07/04/2006 7:07:12 AM PDT by AntiKev (Keppler makes the world go 'round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

Interesting story. But the reporting and misspelled words leave a lot to be desired.


6 posted on 07/04/2006 7:07:23 AM PDT by upchuck (I bought a self-help tape named, "How to Handle Disappointment." I got it home & the box was empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

I used Limewire to get about 20 songs this year. I just blocked it on Norton and Zonealarm and after reading a previous post, I'll turn off sharing.... if I can find it.


7 posted on 07/04/2006 7:08:46 AM PDT by Fawn (BUILD A LONG TALL WALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

This is Palm Beach County....what did you expect? Seriously on the news story last night, they mentioned that other people are getting the same letters...if you don't pay up in a few days, they keep raising the extortion...


8 posted on 07/04/2006 7:09:56 AM PDT by Fawn (BUILD A LONG TALL WALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
I fail to see any real difference between loading files from the internet and copying them off the air from your radio. I mean, a hundred dollar radio. a patch cable and a copy of cooledit or something and you can make your own mp3 files off the fricking air. They gonna start charging us for owning radios?

This is a legitimate candidate for stupidest BS in the American business world. In business math 102 or simple calculus they teach that there is a price for anything which maximizes profits and that price is NOT the highest price you could ever get for one copy. The whole world seems to know that EXCEPT for the RIAA which went in a single day from selling LPs for $7 to selling CDs which were cheaper to produce for $16 - $18 and they've never dropped the price a dime since then and they wonder why people share files over the internet.

Somebody needs to sue the RIAA into tommorrow-morrow land, this thing they're doing is harassment pure and simple and it amounts to the same thing as cops pulling an individual car here and there out of a line of traffic for speeding, which also will not hold up in court on a permanent basis.

9 posted on 07/04/2006 7:10:38 AM PDT by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

I find it interesting that they mention the cd plant worker and the and the record store clerks. It looks like to me like the record compaines would have no problem making all they sell digital downloads. Also, if somboady ordered an actual prerecorded cd on-line aren't they putting some record store clerk out of work?
I am willing to bet that more people are working at plants making CDs now than before downloading became common.


10 posted on 07/04/2006 7:11:18 AM PDT by feedback doctor (Liberalism is like a religion....islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

If you're going to do this stuff, best do it on a linux system and use gtk-gnutella.


11 posted on 07/04/2006 7:14:01 AM PDT by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wildwood

Yeah.... It's spelled "whorehouse."


12 posted on 07/04/2006 7:15:24 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tomzz

These folks will also randomly select businesses...restaurants, gyms, retail stores - and see if they are playing the radio throughout the business.
If they are, then the extortion of the business owner begins.


13 posted on 07/04/2006 7:16:10 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tomzz

"Somebody needs to sue the RIAA into tommorrow-morrow land..."


Absolutely. You also mentioned their illegal price fixing. How the corporate mother can get away with this defies the imagination. CD's literally cost pennies to make, yet the prices remain fixed......probably forever.

Bogus morality works both ways......let the downloads continue until the RIAA and the record industry in general gets called to task for their own sins.


14 posted on 07/04/2006 7:16:43 AM PDT by Dazedcat ((Please God, make it stop))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
Morpheus: morpheus.com

Kazaa: www.kazaa.com

Bearshare: www.bearshare.com

Limewire: www.limewire.com

Brilliant! I wonder what Pepsi's website is? Or Free Republic?

15 posted on 07/04/2006 7:16:46 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

I had a business destroyed by Napster. While the music business was foolish to drag its feet regarding digital distribution, that has been corrected over the last 6 years.

Yes these people know they are stealing.


16 posted on 07/04/2006 7:16:51 AM PDT by rwilson99 (Too soon... to forget. See United 93)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AntiKev
How in the hell does bitorrent work? I looked into that once and was amazed at how complex it was.
17 posted on 07/04/2006 7:19:47 AM PDT by Vision ("America's best days lie ahead. You ain't seen nothing yet"- Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99

A business which could be "destroyed by Napster" wasn't much of a business.


18 posted on 07/04/2006 7:22:14 AM PDT by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

I never did turn on the sharing command. Hope you are right. I only downloaded about 50 old song before all the flap started and haven't done it since.


19 posted on 07/04/2006 7:23:06 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Are libs having too much fun forcing Bush to play "Mother May I?" to fight the war on terror?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vision
It's not really that hard. You download a bittorrent client (there are a bunch of them, I use bittornado). Then you download a .torrent file from a website that hosts them. Then you open the .torrent file with your bittorrent client.
20 posted on 07/04/2006 7:23:17 AM PDT by Sofa King (A wise man uses compromise as an alternative to defeat. A fool uses it as an alternative to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99

Like someone pointed out...you can record off the radio. It's not like my CD's are free....I buy them...plus I pay for internet usage and electric.....not to mention my time...it's worth money to.


21 posted on 07/04/2006 7:23:56 AM PDT by Fawn (BUILD A LONG TALL WALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dazedcat

The other thing you can do which must frost these idiots is download classical music. Copyrights expire after about fifty years, and guys like Richard Wagner and Wolfgang Mozart don't really care.


22 posted on 07/04/2006 7:23:58 AM PDT by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tomzz
I fail to see any real difference between loading files from the internet and copying them off the air from your radio. I mean, a hundred dollar radio. a patch cable and a copy of cooledit or something and you can make your own mp3 files off the fricking air.

Good point. I've wondered about that, too.

Also, I am sure they are REAL concerned about the "session players, sound engineers, cd plant workers, wharehouse personnel, record store clerks". I am sure they are VERY concerned that these people get a GREAT pay check. Yeah, those jet-set high-roller Hollywood-type warehouse workers. Just a guilt trip they use on the suckers they catch.

23 posted on 07/04/2006 7:24:25 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King

OK, but don't others have to upload them somewhere?


24 posted on 07/04/2006 7:24:45 AM PDT by Vision ("America's best days lie ahead. You ain't seen nothing yet"- Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
I'm am troubled by this in ways that are somewhat different than most have expressed here. The music industry knowingly continues to sell a defective product (CD failure rates) yet will not acknowledge this. Can anyone explain why (with as big of pockets the music industry has) there has not been a class action suit to make them change their ways? Just curious.
25 posted on 07/04/2006 7:25:44 AM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

I havent heard anything worth copying in the last 5 years.

I like country music and this new crap isnt country.

I will stick to my George Jones and Patsy Cline CD's


26 posted on 07/04/2006 7:26:13 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomzz
They gonna start charging us for owning radios?

This is the same industry that got legislation passed that includes money to them for every recordable CD sold, because they will supposedly be used to record copyrighted works. But if you download the works, they sue you. Bastages shouldn't be able to have it both ways.

27 posted on 07/04/2006 7:26:35 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tomzz
"The whole world seems to know that EXCEPT for the RIAA which went in a single day from selling LPs for $7 to selling CDs which were cheaper to produce for $16 - $18 and they've never dropped the price a dime since then and they wonder why people share files over the internet. "

You know it seems to me that there must be price collusion in the music industry. It is rediculous that I can buy movies cheaper than a music album.

The only music I've bought in years, was second hand CD's.

28 posted on 07/04/2006 7:28:20 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

Jeez, about half the songs I have are probably on CD or tape around here somewhere, or at least used to. I see no sense in re-buying every album I ever bought because I want to hear a song or 10 that I have owned in the past.

Regardless, my share folder has squat in it. MP3s get moved as soon as they are downloaded.

I'd be willing to bet they aren't nailing adults like me who download old one-hit-wonders, classic rock and bluegrass. The music industry is in the sorriest state it has ever been in and it is NOT file-sharing's fault. It is the industry's fault. As long as it's all "ganta's and ho's", American Idol-type manufactured "talent" singing dopey crap, and the slut-singer-du-jour I will keep on downloading.


29 posted on 07/04/2006 7:30:37 AM PDT by L98Fiero (I'm worth a million in prizes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Your comment is an oversimplification at best.

Downloading or reproducing recorded music without paying is petty thievery. It's not a right you possess any more than going into a store and lifting something off the shelf. When one engages in that activity, many persons in the vertical market, are deprived of the profit they deserve for their effort in producing the recording. So, as you well know, the RIAA is not trying to prevent peopple from listening to music at home, just trying to prevent them from "stealing" it.

The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) is the trade group that represents the U.S. recording industry. Its mission is to foster a business and legal climate that supports and promotes members creative and financial vitality. Its members are the record companies that comprise the most vibrant national music industry in the world. RIAA members create, manufacture and/or distribute approximately 90% of all legitimate sound recordings produced and sold in the United States.

They are not 'thugs' as you describe them.

http://www.riaa.com/about/leadership/default.asp

30 posted on 07/04/2006 7:32:19 AM PDT by Banjoguy (I refuse to 'Google' anything at anytime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I stay the hell from file-sharing software and I loathe the thugs at RIAA who have nothing better to do with their time than to go after people just listening to music at home.

Get real. The RIAA is going after people who obtain or copy music illegally. They aren't going after people "just listening to music at home."

Nobody has an automatic right to own copies of copyrighted music for which they haven't paid.

Artists have a right to control the licensing of their copyrighted material.

Copyrighted music is property. Conservatives have huge measures of respect for others' property. Respect it or be prepared to suffer the consequences.

31 posted on 07/04/2006 7:32:44 AM PDT by Chunga (Mock The Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
Great business model. Sue your customers. I used to buy a few music CDs a week. I started using file sharing to find new artists and then would buy their CD if I liked them. Not anymore. I will never give a dime to buy another RIAA related item.

If I want to listen to something, I download it online. Usenet, BitTorrent, there are plenty of options. If I can't find it online I will go down to the local I.T. mall and for a few dollars buy a DVD filled with the latest albums... all without a penny going to the RIAA's lawyers.

P.S. RIAA you can send your threat letter to me here in Thailand and I will be more than happy to laugh at your stupidity... while my newest MP3 is playing in the background.

32 posted on 07/04/2006 7:39:39 AM PDT by killjoy (Dirka dirka mohammed jihad! Sherpa sherpa bakalah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chunga
Artists have a right to control the licensing of their copyrighted material.

What about when the intent of copyright law is destroyed by ensuring those copyrights never expire? What about the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act which basically guarantees nothing will ever be placed in the public domain again?

33 posted on 07/04/2006 7:43:08 AM PDT by killjoy (Dirka dirka mohammed jihad! Sherpa sherpa bakalah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
They're biting the hand that feeds them. Music fans like me are the kind of people that drive the industry. We hear buzz about a band, we download the mp3's, we buy the CD's, we buy the concert tickets, merchandice and magazines.

Now without that distribution instrument, we become more hesitant about listening to new music since CD's cost 15-19 dollars. That reduces the exposure of new bands we would listen to.

Yes, MP3 technology is illegal, but also remember so was the radio broadcast of music. The music industry shoots itself in the foot constantly.

34 posted on 07/04/2006 7:44:21 AM PDT by TypeZoNegative (".... We are a nation of Americans. We are DECENDED from legal immigrants"- johnandrhonda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiKev
One word: BitTorrent.

If you really want to be safe- Usenet via encrypted anonymous proxy server.

(not that I do this myself :)
35 posted on 07/04/2006 7:47:35 AM PDT by WackySam ("There's room for all God's creatures- right next to the taters")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
It is possible, that someone probably downloaded over 10,000 songs onto my computer at sometime. I believe a hacker somehow did it =). I guess they had a way of using more underground online sources that are below the prying eyes of the RIAA. It's a great collection of music, just happens to be everything I ever enjoyed listening to!

It isn't on my hard drive anymore, I don't know where it went. It may have found it's way onto a compilation of DVD data disks.

36 posted on 07/04/2006 7:51:06 AM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: killjoy

There's a new model of music sharing that these guys cannot monitor (unless they insert spyware on everybody's PC, which I wouldn't put past them). With very large hard drives and WiFi, teens just get together and merge their music collections on each others laptops whenever they get together. Or copy music to 1 GB keychain flash drives. Nothing on the internet, no way to monitor,


37 posted on 07/04/2006 7:56:20 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the arrogance to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Banjoguy

They are "thugs" when they, without cause, without warrant or due process invade my home (scan my computer) to see if I have violated the law.


38 posted on 07/04/2006 8:00:27 AM PDT by Plain Old American (Remember who said what; Remind those who don't Remember; Vote and take a friend to the polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

Wow. This is one of the most poorly-written aritcles I've ever read.


39 posted on 07/04/2006 8:03:50 AM PDT by BlessedBeGod (Benedict XVI = Terminator IV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
The music industry pukes have been a bunch of crooks for 60 years, cheating the artists, payola, drug bribes, obscene lyrics and music videos, etc. I have no sympathy for them. If I had a little more time, I'd post a set of federal court motions and discovery requests for pro se defendants. But, alas, I don't really have much sympathy for the freeloaders either.
40 posted on 07/04/2006 8:04:10 AM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: killjoy
What about when the intent of copyright law is destroyed by ensuring those copyrights never expire? What about the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act which basically guarantees nothing will ever be placed in the public domain again?

Some FReepers like to make things up as they go along...it's akin to lying one's ass off.

I'm not interested in addressing points without basis in reality. I'll just tell you that the act you mention extends copyright protections by 20 years. It doesn't "basically guarantee nothing will ever be placed in the public domain again."

Please don't waste my time with false arguments.

41 posted on 07/04/2006 8:06:19 AM PDT by Chunga (Mock The Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Dazedcat
Absolutely. You also mentioned their illegal price fixing. How the corporate mother can get away with this defies the imagination. CD's literally cost pennies to make, yet the prices remain fixed......probably forever.

Since they make the product they are free to charge whatever they think they can get people to pay for it. Simple economics. If you don't like that price, don't buy the CD. Anyway, the same argument you would use to justify illegal file downloads can be used to justify shoplifting. However I don't think you would have too much sympathy for the person who tries to sneak a CD out of the store while claiming that he was just "trying to stick it to the man."

FWIW I have more than a passinig interest in this issue. I make my bread off of royalties (I'm a writer of college textbooks on mathematics and computer science.) If anyone had an illegal copy of one my works, I sure would take legal action against them.

42 posted on 07/04/2006 8:08:49 AM PDT by PackerBronco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

The only way they can see what you have on your hard drive is to copy the list of songs and other files that you have stored in your "share" file that you offer to others.

Either that or they installed and/or used a hacker's program on your 'puter, which is illegal.


43 posted on 07/04/2006 8:09:39 AM PDT by HighWheeler ("The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

44 posted on 07/04/2006 8:13:36 AM PDT by HighWheeler ("The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Plain Old American
invade my home (scan my computer) to see if I have violated the law.

Explain to me how they do that?

Oh and by the way, you'll find that the people most vociferously opposed to The RIAA and any rational discussion regarding it's primary support functions, are the worst offenders, if you will, of music file swapping, often going to great lengths to change the subject in order to make them into villains for trying to uphold copyrights and maintain profitability.

45 posted on 07/04/2006 8:18:15 AM PDT by Banjoguy (I refuse to 'Google' anything at anytime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: tomzz

"I fail to see any real difference between loading files from the internet and copying them off the air from your radio. I mean, a hundred dollar radio. a patch cable and a copy of cooledit or something and you can make your own mp3 files off the fricking air. They gonna start charging us for owning radios?"

-- --

It's OK to copy a song off the radio via air. What the RIAA is bitching about is that private citizens don't have the rights to distribute the music.

It is not the copying that they are going after, it's the people involved in the distribution.

I am wholeheartedly against the US copyright laws that allow an effectively infinite timespan to own a work. Patents only allow 17 or 20 years, which should also be enough time for a song to sell a bundle for their creator. This would drive the really talented people to work harder instead of sitting on a song's royalties forever.


46 posted on 07/04/2006 8:19:32 AM PDT by HighWheeler ("The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

If the recording industry would embrace legally selling music online at 99 cents a song there would be little incentive to pirate music. Using programs file sharing programs like Kazaa fill your computer with spyware, browser hijackers and worse and the audio quality of some of these downloads is questionable. Instead of going to a record store and spending nearly $20 for a CD that is mostly shlock if people could go to a music store step up to a computer Kiosk and pick the songs they want from 100,000 titles for under a buck and load them directly to their I-pod or MP3 player, more outlets would sell music and sales would increase. The recording industry, particularly Sony, is shooting themselves in the foot.


47 posted on 07/04/2006 8:19:52 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision
It's a non-centralized system. The bittorrent client will connect you to a tracker, which can connect you to other people who have the same .torrent file running on their client. Like all P2P systems, this does rely on somebody else being out there to share the file. Bittorrent tends to work better with downloads that are currently popular. Getting older stuff with it can be a little hard.

To get the .torrent files themselves, you have to look on the internet. They have some search engines out there (like torrentspy), and some sites that host a lot of .torrent files.
48 posted on 07/04/2006 8:22:07 AM PDT by Sofa King (A wise man uses compromise as an alternative to defeat. A fool uses it as an alternative to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
little incentive to pirate music.

"The only reason kids download music is because the $h!+ just isn't worth buying."
-Bruce Dickinson, Iron Maiden

49 posted on 07/04/2006 8:23:30 AM PDT by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King

Thanks


50 posted on 07/04/2006 8:24:03 AM PDT by Vision ("America's best days lie ahead. You ain't seen nothing yet"- Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-189 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson