Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2002 Document: Orders To Watch For Americans Burying WMD in The Western Desert (Translation)
Pentagon/FMSO website for Iraq Pre-war documents ^ | July 5 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 07/05/2006 7:28:40 AM PDT by jveritas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-79 last
To: Izzy Dunne
"Sheesh - I can hear Howard the Dean saying this same thing now..."

So far Dean, the rest of the DIMocrats, and the MSM, have ignored the growing document translations and have played down announcements of the discovery of WMD. For any of them to claim legitimacy for this, or any similar document, to suit their ends opens themselves to having to accept the legitimacy of all the translated material. That's something they definitely don't want. If they jump on something like this then they're even dumber than I thought.

51 posted on 07/05/2006 11:04:21 AM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; stylin19a
stylin19a,

To add to what jveritas just said, if you notice who the letter was sent to: " To: All The People Commands."

What this tells me is that an upper class group of the regime was indeed worried about WMD being found in the western desert area. In fact, jveritas has another document that discusses such an area.

Since everything was so compartmentalized, one group not knowing about the other, my guess is that if the inspectors found those buried WMD then this message has been sent out so that ALL departments are on the same page when telling the inspectors and reporters that the Americans put them there.

A bit of pre-programming the general Iraqi response if WMD were found.

Not sure if what I wrote makes sense.

52 posted on 07/05/2006 11:10:58 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
For any of them to claim legitimacy for this, or any similar document, to suit their ends opens themselves to having to accept the legitimacy of all the translated material.

True. But I meant that Dean or somebody might make the same argument, even if the document didn't exist.
It just sounds like the logic (?) he would use.

53 posted on 07/05/2006 11:13:01 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ElectricStrawberry

That was the MiG Lt. Belenko gave us when he defected. No...wait....we sent that back to Russia in pieces. Or did we???? LOL.....the tinfoilers are going to have a field day with this bit of news.


54 posted on 07/05/2006 11:16:23 AM PDT by edpc (Violence is ALWAYS a solution. Maybe not the right one....but a solution nonetheless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
"But I meant that Dean or somebody might make the same argument, even if the document didn't exist.

It just sounds like the logic (?) he would use.

I'll buy that. BTW, I wasn't criticizing, just observing. And I won't hold my breath thinking Dean or any other DIM would be too smart not to get caught up in that conundrum. I don't put anything past them for stupidity.

55 posted on 07/05/2006 11:17:44 AM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: avacado

Excellent point.


56 posted on 07/05/2006 11:26:25 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; avacado
Just all kinds of good stuff in these documents....

The World is so much better with this Tyrant removed.

Thanks again for your excellent work JV!

57 posted on 07/05/2006 11:55:47 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Great job. I see that as a CYA memo. They know they buried them there and were preemptively making a case to deny, deny if such were found.

My recommendation to our guys would be to head out there right now and start digging around. Bet they uncover something.
58 posted on 07/05/2006 11:59:36 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Agreed.


59 posted on 07/05/2006 12:19:40 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Dan Rather would run with this story... but he's history now... LMAO


60 posted on 07/05/2006 12:34:57 PM PDT by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
I bet THIS makes the front page in the MSM.

That might be a good thing if it brings to light the other translations. I say let the truth be known.

61 posted on 07/05/2006 1:12:08 PM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Make that at least three of us... and counting!


62 posted on 07/05/2006 1:50:20 PM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

I wish we had been clever enough to do that!


63 posted on 07/05/2006 4:14:04 PM PDT by gotribe (It's not a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Jveritas!

A thought just hit me and it's an obvious thought. If it has been discussed then excuse me for bringing it up again. But if the top level of the Hussein regime is concerned about Americans burying WMD in Iraq, why are they only concerned about one area?

I mean, wouldn't ALL of Iraq be fair game for the USA to bury WMD?

I think your earlier document about WMD burial near Fallujah ties DIRECTLY into his document.
64 posted on 07/05/2006 4:41:33 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
First of all, thanks for all your work. I've no doubt at some point it will be recognized wider than now.

Obviously, this is a precursor to the bad guys being able to say the weapons, if in fact they are there and discovered, are planted.

Unfortunately for them, I believe the technology exists to determine the origins and pedigree of anything of this nature.

Should anything be found, this may be a great demonstration to the now defunct Baathists of the old adage "be careful what you wish for."

65 posted on 07/05/2006 4:50:13 PM PDT by mitchbert (Facts Are Stubborn Things .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avacado
I completely agree that there is so much focus by them on the Anbar province (the western desert).
66 posted on 07/05/2006 7:20:50 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: mitchbert
I think we need to search the Anbar province large desert for WMD. I know it is a very huge task to do so but getting the right intelligence will make things easier.
67 posted on 07/05/2006 7:24:02 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Have you seen this?
68 posted on 07/06/2006 4:54:17 AM PDT by sono ("May the Wings of Liberty never lose a feather." Jack Burton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

No it is not the same person. i am sure, i checked with Ali Muhsen Hamid himself.


69 posted on 01/21/2007 9:24:16 AM PST by Reemah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Reemah

Thank you very much Reemah!

Welcome to FreeRepublic.

All of jveritas's translations are under Keyword: PreWarDocs or at his profile page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~jveritas

If you need help navigating this site or features, give me a private mail.


70 posted on 01/21/2007 11:54:03 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Reemah

Are you with the Arab League, Reemah?


71 posted on 01/21/2007 12:52:13 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

ping to post no. 69.


72 posted on 01/21/2007 12:53:43 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Cindy; Calpernia

Thank you very much Cindy. Freeper Calpernia pinged earlier as well on freepmail.


73 posted on 01/21/2007 1:11:13 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thank you JVeritas.
I think you have a game player here and nothing serious.
I could be wrong, but "Reemah" would have to prove that.


74 posted on 01/21/2007 1:13:04 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
I would be interested to know what prompted Reemah to check this relatively old thread.
75 posted on 01/21/2007 1:17:04 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Me too.


76 posted on 01/21/2007 1:19:44 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

OPINION: It's been my experience that when a new poster signs up to post on an old thread; it's because he/she has been using a search engine (usually Google) to search certain terms.

So, let's look again at what question Reemah answered.

"Is Hamid Mushsen Ali a different person from the Arab League Ambassador to Britain, Ali Muhsen Hamid?"

Looking at the question, I speculate that Reemah was looking at one or more of the following search terms via a search engine. The search terms are "Arab League" or "Arab League Ambassador" or "Ali Muhsen Hamid."


77 posted on 01/21/2007 1:23:28 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Thanks Cindy, what you wrote is a very possible explanation.


78 posted on 01/21/2007 1:31:14 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Yes, it's happened to threads I have posted on a number of times.


79 posted on 01/21/2007 1:39:42 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-79 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson