Sounds like the N.Y. Times has been bad for a long, long time.
posted on 07/05/2006 12:13:31 PM PDT
Now you'd think the Washington Times would have done their homework better.. sheesh. The article says: The Times notes the same story was simultaneously broken by the Wall Street Journal and Los Angeles Times, but so far they have not come in for the same criticism. Not exactly true. The NY Times broke the story FIRST, the mnight before, on its website. The LA Times and WSJ only ran their respective articles after this was known. Which, of course, changes the whole context of this argument. Not that I don't think they ALL suck for divuldging this info at all. I expect this sort of error from the Washington ComPort but not the Times...
posted on 07/05/2006 12:22:04 PM PDT
But they were bad too !!!
posted on 07/05/2006 12:49:22 PM PDT
(A country without secure borders will not long be a country.)
damn.. they're like sandlot bratty kids I tell you.. LOL
posted on 07/05/2006 12:57:39 PM PDT
posted on 07/05/2006 1:00:09 PM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson