Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter: Top Secret Interview Exposed!
HumanEvents ^ | 7/5/6 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 07/05/2006 2:01:58 PM PDT by ZGuy

It was nice to see the New York Times commemorating Independence Day this week with a tribute to its favorite Revolutionary War hero, Benedict Arnold. Times editor Bill Keller spent the day attending Revolutionary War battle re-enactments, where he passed the Continental Army's secret battle plans to the British.

Get Yours FREE! This week I plan to reveal my own top secret information: an interview I did with the New York Post the week my current No. 1 best seller, "Godless," was released. On account of an important breaking story on Angelina Jolie's new tattoo, the Post never found room to run the long interview I wasted my time answering for the Post's Larry Getlen.

Once considered a legitimate daily, the Post has been reduced to tabloid status best known for Page Six's breathless accounts of Paris Hilton's latest ruttings, and headlines like "Vampire Teen -- H.S. Girl Is Out for Blood." How crappy a newspaper is the Post? Let me put it this way: It's New York's second-crappiest paper.

Maybe the Post's constant harassment of me is an attempt to shake me down for protection money like they did with billionaire businessman Ron Burkle. I have sold a LOT of books -- more books, come to think of it, than any writers at the New York Post.

Here's Part 1:

NY POST: Vitriol aside for a moment, how would you define a liberal, politically speaking?

A: Naive, misinformed fanatical Mother Earth-worshipers and fervent America-haters -- and those are their good traits.

NY POST: In "Godless," you lump many views you disagree with under the banner of a liberal religion. But many Democrats (as with Republicans) disagree amongst themselves on many of these issues. Do you consider all Americans who vote Democrat to be liberals?

A: Or fools.

NY POST: How many liberals do you think there actually are in this country?

A: Way too many, but that's just a rough estimate. You know, somewhere in the ballpark of "way too many."

NY POST: Your books, like Bill O'Reilly's, generally go to No. 1. But so do Michael Moore's and Al Franken's. What do you think this says about the real nature of what Americans believe, politically and ideologically?

A: Judging by your list, that half of them are patriotic.

NY POST: In the last two presidential elections combined, the number of people who voted for the Democrat and the number who voted for the Republican were pretty close to even. Isn't it safe to say that the country rests somewhere in the middle of conservatism and liberalism?

A: Yes, I think the results of the last "American Idol" vote pretty much proved that.

NY POST: Your characterization of liberals paints them as extremists. But with people like Pat Robertson telling us how God keeps telling him who He's angry at, isn't it fair to say that there are extremists on both sides?

A: Pat Robertson opposes capital punishment, opposed the impeachment of Bill Clinton and supports trade with China, just for starters. Seems like a pretty mixed bag to me. So what makes you call him extreme? That he believes he has dialogue with the Lord? Do liberals now call anyone who thinks this an "extremist"?

NY POST: Do you believe there is a political middle? If so, how would you define it?

A: There is no more a "political middle" than there is a family in America with 2.3 children. People with opinions take sides. Contrary to what you've heard, it's actually more important to stand for something than it is for everybody to "just get along."

NY POST: You speak in the book of "Muslims' predilection for violence," accepting it as a given. But many would argue that many Muslims, in this country and others, lead average, everyday lives, and denounce violence. How is painting all Muslims as violent any different than looking at the Crusades, or at any of the Christian extremist groups around today, and saying, "All Christians are murderers?"

A: Quite obviously, referring to "Muslims' predilection for violence" is not the same as saying, "All Christians are murderers." It would be the same if I had said, "All Muslims are murderers." You didn't do too well on the analogies section of the SATs, did you?

NY POST: You say that "without a fundamental understanding of man's place in the world" (by which you mean God), we risk being lured into, among other things, slavery. But weren't the American slaveholders devout Christians?

A: They may have been devout Christians, but they weren't being good Christians by holding slaves. That's the point: Any Christian slaveholder had to violate Christianity to own slaves.

Thus -- and obviously -- the abolitionist movement was fueled by Christians, much as the anti-abortion movement is today.

I'm sure in the year 2106 some future Ann Coulter will be asked to explain why some Christians had abortions 100 years earlier. Christians sometimes lapse into the church of liberalism by doing bad things, just as liberals sometimes lapse into our church by doing good things.

(To be continued later this summer ...)


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; coulter; newyorkpost; nypost; nyt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: Rummyfan
This portion would work for ya. "It's actually more important to stand for something than it is for everybody to "just get along." - Ann Coulter
21 posted on 07/05/2006 7:18:31 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

"How crappy a newspaper is the Post? Let me put it this way: It's New York's second-crappiest paper."

That's gonna leave a mark....


22 posted on 07/05/2006 8:30:20 PM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
I actually love the NYPost. It makes me laugh, and their editorials are usually pretty great.

When I lived in L.A., I had it delivered daily, but I have yet to see one here in Austin, which figures.

23 posted on 07/05/2006 8:39:27 PM PDT by AnnaZ (I think so, Brain, but if we give peas a chance, won't the lima beans feel left out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

24 posted on 07/05/2006 9:14:28 PM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

I love this woman...she makes the awkwardness and pimples of puberty so worth it.


25 posted on 07/05/2006 9:27:29 PM PDT by GOP_Raider (FR's token San Francisco Giants fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

Ann apparently has a problem with the Post, but I don't. Every paper - - including the Washington Times and the Wall Street Journal - - has its share of humorless scumbag liberals on board. The Post is generally pretty conservative, at least editorially. I figure there's a few humorless scumbags at the Post that Ann let get under her skin. Fortunately for her, (I am pretty sure) there are a whole lot more people who read her columns than read the Post, so she will always have the upper hand in any battles with them.


26 posted on 07/05/2006 9:31:11 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Ann Coulter gives the Left some of what has been its stock in trade for 40 years. In-your-face, demonizing name calling. In their case it is quite accurate, and they don't like it. This is why they attempt to physically intimidate her- which doesn't work. O'Reilly thinks civility works best, but I disagree. The problem with "conservatives" in this country is they too often go along for the sake of getting along, turning into Lindsay Graham.


27 posted on 07/06/2006 7:10:12 AM PDT by steve8714
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
I can't wait for the New York Post to publish its interview with the future Ann Coulter in 2575.

(The Palestinian terrorist regime is the crisis and Israel's fist is the answer.)

28 posted on 07/06/2006 7:12:01 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
It's New York's second-crappiest paper. If you can make it there, you can make it ANYwhere!

Good one IJ!! LOL!

But at the same time "If you CAN'T make it there, you CAN't make it ANyWHERE!"

29 posted on 07/06/2006 1:11:14 PM PDT by subterfuge (Call me a Jingoist, I don't care...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

Possible stupid question: Was this an actual interview?


30 posted on 07/06/2006 1:17:39 PM PDT by subterfuge (Call me a Jingoist, I don't care...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge
Possible stupid question:

Was this an actual interview?

This apparently WAS a real interview, but The Post, for some reason, never published it.

From the article,

...This week I plan to reveal my own top secret information: an interview I did with the New York Post the week my current No. 1 best seller, "Godless," was released.

On account of an important breaking story on Angelina Jolie's new tattoo, the Post never found room to run the long interview I wasted my time answering for the Post's Larry Getlen...


31 posted on 07/07/2006 5:51:29 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy; Ann Coulter

Posh. Can't you see there must have been "technical difficulties" which prevented Mr. Getlen from publishing?

Getlen's recording of the interview started to disintegrate about the point where Ann quipped; "You didn't do too well on the analogies section of the SATs, did you?"

The Post not publishing the interview may have cost Ann the sale of a few books, but the value of this recounting of that quip toward heightening her legend is priceless. As a foil for the press in general, it appears La Coulter detected that Getlen was possessed of their typical intelligence.


32 posted on 07/10/2006 4:18:02 AM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (You can't see where we're going when you don't look where we've been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

Hooray Ann!

She has more verbal firepower in one-on-one combat that anyone on the planet.

Hooray Ann!


33 posted on 07/10/2006 4:35:27 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
It seems clear that they didn't run this interview because it was obvious that she was head and shoulders more witty and intelligent than the interviewer...won't do to let their readership see how stupid their media shills are.
34 posted on 07/10/2006 4:44:47 AM PDT by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

Very cool interview. Nobody does it quite like Ann.


35 posted on 07/10/2006 5:30:05 AM PDT by blitzgig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

I was critical of the Jersey Girl comments in her book, but I do love her wit in this column!


36 posted on 07/10/2006 8:15:49 AM PDT by soccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
All right, the pix are swell, but I frankly appreciate the biting sarcasm with a deadly earnest point still more...she delivers a knock-out with this one:

There is no more a "political middle" than there is a family in America with 2.3 children. People with opinions take sides. Contrary to what you've heard, it's actually more important to stand for something than it is for everybody to "just get along."

37 posted on 07/10/2006 12:13:50 PM PDT by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
Any Christian slaveholder had to violate Christianity to own slaves.

Wrong.

Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh...
--Ephesians 6:5

38 posted on 07/10/2006 12:17:46 PM PDT by steve-b ("Creation Science" is to the religous right what "Global Warming" is to the socialist left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

The verse you copied is directed to slaves, so it is not addressed to masters. What does the bible say to Masters?


39 posted on 07/10/2006 12:35:47 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
What does the bible say to Masters?

For Coulter's assertion to be correct, the answer to your question would have to be "Free your slaves". Got chapter and verse for that?

40 posted on 07/10/2006 12:38:01 PM PDT by steve-b ("Creation Science" is to the religous right what "Global Warming" is to the socialist left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson