Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study Claiming Biological Basis for Homosexuality “Absolute Rubbish”: NARTH Psychiatrist
LifeSiteNews.com ^ | July 10, 2006 | Gudrun Schultz

Posted on 07/10/2006 11:22:43 AM PDT by DBeers

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: DBeers
A Psychiatrist can indeed be both.
41 posted on 07/10/2006 5:13:29 PM PDT by Ramcat (Thank You American Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: utahagen

"We should concede there may be -- may be, not is - a biological basis for homosexuality, and then we should add, "So what?" There may be a genetic basis for alcoholism, but no (sane) person is arguing that alcoholics should be allowed to show up at work drunk."

And then bare the double-edged sword to this whole silly leftist 'science' project, one that makes the liberals cringe,

"And if they do discover a 'gay gene,' wouldn't that be awful for the gay community? Just imagine all those breeders aborting kids with the gene to ensure grandkids..."

Then they have to decide whether they'd then choose between abortion rights or gay rights. Their heads will explode.


42 posted on 07/10/2006 5:17:20 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile ('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Billy Jeff, Pence, McQueeg & Bush related?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

You are right! How many "gay", "fat" babies are going to make it out of the womb?


43 posted on 07/10/2006 7:34:01 PM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Absolute rubbish. Yes indeed.


44 posted on 07/10/2006 8:19:41 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Conservomax

This article and links on the thread explain in detail the causes of homosexuality. And the fact that if a homosexual wants out of the "gay" life, he or she has a good chance of doing so.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1420619/posts


45 posted on 07/10/2006 8:23:40 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DBeers; little jeremiah

Right on the nail!!


46 posted on 07/10/2006 8:28:08 PM PDT by rzeznikj at stout (ASCII and ye shall receive... (Computers 3:14))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeorgefromGeorgia

Note my comment above, click the link, read up and then you'll have a good foundation about the causes of homosexuality.


47 posted on 07/10/2006 8:39:01 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: utahagen
Well, I have to admit it wasn't my concept. But boy, was it a great one. Talk about making the Rats tear each other up. If they ever DO discover the gene, all hell will break loose on the left. Dare they (gasp!) impose a RESTRICTION on abortion? Or do they allow gays to be the victims of an in-womb Holocaust?

It will be interesting to see the division on the right on this issue, as well.

Here's something I found out in the process of looking for this article that really, really pisses me off. Doctors setting themselves up as the decisionmakers--because of political pressure--have NOT told some people whose children are at high risk about a test that would let them know if their kid will be born deaf or with a specific form or mental retardation. This seems to me something parents will want to know, and the test is something these folks deserve to know about. Yet deaf-nuts and Downs-nuts have pressured doctors away from even MENTIONING the tests, nominally out of their perception that 'it's okay to be deaf' and 'it's okay to have Down's,' but in reality, out of fear parents will selectively abort the deaf or retarded kids who are these nut groups' future. You can bet gays would try the same kind of thing if the gene is discovered.

48 posted on 07/10/2006 9:07:22 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile ('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Billy Jeff, Pence, McQueeg & Bush related?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

yup. His second wife also gave him two daughters. wa-hahahahahaha


49 posted on 07/11/2006 5:40:54 AM PDT by fivecatsandadog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: fivecatsandadog

I feel sorry for his daughters if he is that shallow. Being the eldest of seven sons I always wanted a girl but my beloved presented me with a couple of lovable lunks of boys. Oh, well.


50 posted on 07/11/2006 9:10:20 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson