Skip to comments.Esquire puts Mccain on the Cover (The Mccain Mutiny Strikes Again)
Posted on 07/11/2006 11:35:49 AM PDT by SDGOP
click here to read article
"McCain: "I would never say this publicly, but some of these talk-show hosts -- and I'm not saying they should be taken off the air; they have the right to do what they want to do -- I don't think they're good for America."
Mclame isn't good for America
Sounds like hes still mad at rush for his joke about mccain being so in love with himself that he screams out his own name during sex.
Oh please, I'm going to hurl. Yes, we are aware of McCain's old war injuries (I assume that's what this is), but what's with the "tenderness and sadness" bit? How pathetique, the absolute pathos of it all!
Its become a cross between GQ/Punk/Playboylight.
lol he might be
That's absolutely correct. However, what you can't seem to get thru that thick numb-skull (Kennedy/Kerry influenced) brain of your, McPain, is that they came here "LEGALLY." Got it dummy?
Oh by the way (go ahead and flame people) but if he is the nominee--and the reasons are numerous, beginning with his treatment of all of us Vietnam Vets who "dared" criticize his buddy Kerry as well as his actions with regards to MIA/POW in Senate, among many others--I WILL sit this one out.
You want to get something Liberal done. It's the only reason anyone hooks up to Kennedy. Besides, when you hook up with someone of as ill repute and mocked by every late night talk show host in America because he's an over the hill alcoholic windbag with a past with a certain young woman that ended up dead, you get what you deserve.
Abe Lincoln was a member of the Big tent party? LOL!!
BTW, I'm soooo glad the bigot continues his attack on people of faith. Worked real well for him in South Carolina.
I would never say this publicly, but some of these talk-show hosts -- and I'm not saying they should be taken off the air; they have the right to do what they want to do -- I don't think they're good for America.
Of course you don't. That's why you've tried to silence them. Rush Limbaugh particularly really sticks it to you, doen't he? Every single time he does a parady of Maverick John McCain...every single time he points out you are a Liberal seeking to destroy Conservatives...how dare he educate primary voters that hate your guts and will be impassioned about the primaries and their goal to humiliate you across the country with a second and final defeat?
I understand the frustrations a lot of Republicans feel.
Yeah, and you throw up your middle finger in respose with support for tax hikes, embryonic research, terrorists rights, Gang of Fourteen, amnesty, CFR.... Practically every damn thing that has gone WRONG these last years and caused frustration has directly been at YOUR hands you egomanical Liberal fraud.
We're not representing their hopes and dreams and aspirations.
We dream, hope, pray and work for conservative policy and you choose Liberalim. yeah, I'd say you aren't representing us.
We worry about Ms. Schiavo before we worry about balancing the budget. We're going to take up this Family Marriage Amendment again. Why? The Republicans will vote one way, and the Democrats will vote another, and everybody knows it! It's pointless. I've never seen Washington as polarized as it is today.
Talk to your Liberal buddies about that who refuse to accept CONSERVATIVE mandates and allow governance accordingly.
BTW, last I checked the Senate was only willing to vote to encourage a review of Schiavo's case, not mandate one, in a night vote. You get no plaudits from me coward.
And it took a matter of less then a week. Whereas your baseball hearings and Al-Quida legislation took..how long? How about your amnesty kick Senator? How much time has that taken away from controlling pork? And if you are so influential, why isn't prok controlled by now anyway? Unless you have NO influence unless promoting liberalism and use this pork platform as a means to hang onto a sketchy claim to conservatism.
Why focus on marriage? Well, for one, Republicans have followed your lead and carved a hole by embracing liberalism for two years. Being an election year in a sign of desperation they tried to butter up people they've ignored and need to get their votes. Oh, supporting marriage is the RIGHT thing to do to preserve our society but with amnesty you've shown you have no regard for that...
Yes, folks, I hate him. But before the "Moderates" (Liberals) get too upset at that blunt acknowledgement, he hates me. He hates Conservatives. He fired the first shot. So don't come after me for defending conservatism from the enemy and working to take this man down. As I will, in whatever election he represents this party in no matter is the consequence is an elected Democrat. he seeks to destroy conservatism from within the party and is far more dangerous then Hillary Clinton because of it.
No, he doesn't have my vote.
My friends always give me crap when i say i will never vote for mccain. They insist i must vote for mccain in the general election to keep hillary out otherwise she will destroy the country. With hillary we get gridlock, with mccain he'll just go about and destroy everything we conservatives have worked so hard to obtain over the years.
Just what we've been looking for. Another photo op for media whore, McQueeg...
I put "Esquire" in the same category as "Mother Earth News", Liberal fertilizer for New York City high-rise farmers.
I thought that he inherited his money from a Budweiser connection. Hmmmm?
Wait, mccain's wife owns heiniken? I'll have to stop buying it then.
You're stuck with me no matter what!
McCain vs Clinton
Reminds one of elections in the old USSR.
Two choices, one Party.
Well, admittedly McCain did more to destroy the 1st Amendment than the entire Dem Party did in the last ten+ years.
I stopped reading egomaniacal magazines after I found out what the word meant. Besides, the NYT supplies me with all the TP I need without being overly slippery.
This is also the man who posited that, if forced to choose between the First Amendment and "good government", he would choose "good government" every time.
In other words, at heart, he's a totalitarian.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.