1 posted on
07/13/2006 4:00:08 PM PDT by
Hal1950
To: Hal1950
2 posted on
07/13/2006 4:02:02 PM PDT by
mbx1231
To: Hal1950
Federal investigators have dismissed that explanation as the cause of the 1996 explosion that killed all 230 people aboard. Instead they concluded that a spark ignited fuel tank vapors.
And again I ask, why on earth would a Pan Atlantic flight have an empty fuel tank?!?
3 posted on
07/13/2006 4:03:02 PM PDT by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
To: Hal1950
A Massachusetts group has filed a lawsuit to force federal officials to release information about a piece of debris from Flight 800 that it hopes will show that a missile downed the plane.
4 posted on
07/13/2006 4:03:07 PM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
To: Hal1950
Seem to recall close to 100 reported seeing ground to air missle before the plane exploded.
5 posted on
07/13/2006 4:07:33 PM PDT by
Paperdoll
( on the cutting edge.)
To: Hal1950
A Massachusetts group has filed a lawsuit to force federal officials to release information about a piece of debris from Flight 800 that it hopes will show that a missile downed the plane.
It would make for some interesting discussions if it can be proven that a (possibly) terrorist fired missile brought that aircraft down. I'm not suggesting that's what happened or even posing another "conspiracy" theory, just speculating on the possibility.
8 posted on
07/13/2006 4:17:50 PM PDT by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: Hal1950
I hope these folks don't get their hopes too high.
IF there was a terrorist missile attack and cover up, {and I think there was}, No one is going to leave ANY incriminating evidence around to be found.
29 posted on
07/13/2006 8:43:13 PM PDT by
labette
(Student of Murphy's Law)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson