Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mutually Assured Destruction and Why It No Longer Applies (Vanity)
7/14/2006 | Me

Posted on 07/14/2006 7:25:04 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
The world needs to wake up.
1 posted on 07/14/2006 7:25:08 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ImaGraftedBranch; MikefromOhio; cgk; scott says; AmericaUnited; Slings and Arrows; PJ-Comix; ...

Ping.


2 posted on 07/14/2006 7:27:01 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (Conservatives teach you how to fish. Liberals give you the fish by stealing it from the fisherman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

MAD is out the windows not becasue Iran's President and the jihadis are nuts, but because if Iran attacked the US with a nuke, the Assured Destruction would not be Mutual.


3 posted on 07/14/2006 7:30:19 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

MAD is also out the window because the US is fast becoming like the USSR of old: the government decides the rights of the people.


4 posted on 07/14/2006 7:32:32 AM PDT by Ingtar (Prensa dos para el inglés)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

The Soviets were not suicidal, and neither were we. This is the basis of MAD. This no longer applies when suicide is the OBJECT of one of the constituents of the policy. War is inevitable.........


5 posted on 07/14/2006 7:36:06 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

MAD doesn't work vis-a-vis Iran. But it can if you face reality. The reality is this, without Russia and China Iran is powerless. Russia and China are hellbent on either engaging us in open war or weakening us by any means possible, you know, the Cold War Part Duex. OK, fine, its time to stop pussy footing around with these two and call it like it is. Tell China and Russia that since they want a new Cold War you will give them one.

If Iran is their client state they must control it. How about this for starters if Iran or North Korea for that matter launches an attack directly or indirectly against the U.S. or its allies, it will be regarded as a DIRECT attack upon the U.S. by Russia and/or China. If that attack is nuclear, then Russia and China are basically enabling Iran to end the world.

See how fun it is for Russia and China then. If Putin wants to re-start the Cold War, I suggest that he remember that at least the old Soviet Union had an iron fisted control over its client states.


6 posted on 07/14/2006 7:40:14 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

"Tell China and Russia that since they want a new Cold War you will give them one. "

Silly person... then what would we sell at WalMart?


7 posted on 07/14/2006 7:47:11 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

There are always other options for cheap goods, always. Global strategy is fluid. Nixon played the China card, Bush can play the Vietnam card. This notion that China is the only country capable of producing cheap goods is silly. As a matter of fact, talk about MAD China would be more devastated than us if we were to revoke MFN status and shift our trade to elsehwere.


8 posted on 07/14/2006 7:53:56 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

"There are always other options for cheap goods, always. "

That's a swing and a miss....

Much of the goods coming out of China are either coming from American owned factories, or joint ventures with American companies. Given that lobbies control our government, you have a better chance of winning your state lotto than seeing our government take an aggressive stance with China.


9 posted on 07/14/2006 8:00:01 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Nice post, son.


10 posted on 07/14/2006 8:01:22 AM PDT by ImaGraftedBranch (...And we, poor fools, demand truth's noon, who scarce can bear its crescent moon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007
>"they don’t care if they get blown up in the process. After all, they blow themselves up everyday; why would they be afraid of letting someone else do the job for them?"

Sounds like the Christian thing to do would be to help our neighbor achieve his goal.

After all, martydumb is the ONLY* way they can get into heaven. Well that and something about kissing a turd colored rock in the middle of the desert might maybe improve their chances of eternal bliss.

So lets send muuhhamhead (Pigs be inseminating him) to his reward, before he sends us to ours!!!

11 posted on 07/14/2006 8:05:17 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist (I'd rather be carrying a shotgun with Dick, than riding shotgun with a Kennedyl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

All should be reminded that there are over one billion Muslims on the planet, and that tomorrow there can be six hundred million!!


12 posted on 07/14/2006 8:18:02 AM PDT by xkaydet65 (Peace, Love, Brotherhood, and Firepower. And the greatest of these is Firepower!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

Kind of like expecting government to do anything about oil prices and financing of terrorists with US dollars paid for fuels.


13 posted on 07/14/2006 8:23:42 AM PDT by newcthem (This is the final crusade, there are only two sides: pick one.(Brought to you by the Infidel Party))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

While the most radical in Iran would sacrifice their country to further Islam, I doubt many military leaders would willingly commit nuclear suicide. The bomb is more important to the Iranians as a blackmail weapon than in actual use. North Korea is another case and I would worry that the robot like thinking cultivated for 50+ years by the "Dear Leader" could lead to launching a nuclear weapon at Japan or the US or a massive artillary attack on Seoul.


14 posted on 07/14/2006 9:00:24 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007
Mutually Assured Destruction meant that the Soviet Union could not attempt a nuclear attack on the US without risking a deadly reprisal…and vice-versa. The fears of such an occurrence were probably never closer to reality than they were during the infamous Cuban Missile Crisis.

Yet we almost DID face MAD without even knowing about it. The incident didn't come to light for 15 years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Petrov

Stanislav Yefgrafovich Petrov (Russian: Ñòàíèñëàâ Åâãðàôîâè÷ Ïåòðîâ) (born c. 1939) is a retired Russian Strategic Rocket Forces colonel who, on September 26, 1983, averted a potential nuclear war by refusing to believe that the United States had launched missiles against the USSR, despite the indications given by his computerized early warning systems. The Soviet computer reports were later shown to have been in error, and Petrov is credited with preventing World War III and the devastation of much of the Earth by nuclear weapons. Because of military secrecy and international policy, Petrov's actions were kept secret until 1998.

This incident is one of several high-risk decisions that were made by strategic nuclear forces over the years of the Cold War, often at the last minute, by administrative personnel far from the chain of command.


15 posted on 07/14/2006 9:15:00 AM PDT by weegee (Seasons greetings and happy holidays this June-July!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
*smacks head* I can't believe I forgot that.

Here's a page about Petrov.

16 posted on 07/14/2006 9:31:57 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (Conservatives teach you how to fish. Liberals give you the fish by stealing it from the fisherman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

If I had to grade this paper in my English class, you'd receive an A+ for cogent delivery, clear writing, a tightly organized argument, and an ability to make history come alive in the mind of the reader. Excellent work. Thanks for posting this.

I've been thinking the same thoughts about Islamofascism since reading Huntington's book "The Clash of Civilizations." An all-out nuclear war seems to be the goal of these people, not something to be avoided. I would have never believed at some point in my life to consider the Communists sane or logical, but your argument is sound. I could see the capitals of Europe wiped out in a nuclear exchange and armies of Moslems marching north and west to claim the terrority even as those cities burned.

On the other hand, I also have this vision: after several cities in the United States are nuked, the president comes out and says that he's very sad about Mecca and Medina turned into glassy craters in the desert, but he couldn't do anything to stop that captain in a submarine from disobeying orders and acting in an irrational manner. Heh heh heh.


17 posted on 07/14/2006 12:09:11 PM PDT by redpoll (redpoll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Given the current and prevailing possibility of another Cuban Missile Crisis 2.0 taking place in Ukraine, does the world need to wake up concerning MAD not still being applicable?


18 posted on 10/03/2022 11:20:58 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cranked

Needless to say, this particular idea from a post over 16 years old is far less refined than how I would put it now.

Given that it explicitly dealt with the matter of nuclear weapons vis-a-vis radical Islam (Ahmadinejad-era Iran, specifically), the current situation with Russia/Ukraine is not applicable.

As far as Russia is concerned, MAD is still very much a reality.


19 posted on 10/03/2022 11:30:05 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (There is nothing new under the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Understood, just asking questions.
Appreciate your thoughts.


20 posted on 10/03/2022 11:33:18 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson